LA Times: Clemens, Tejada named in steroids affadavit

[daske17]

How about a little shock for Brian Roberts! I mean, Brian Roberts?!

[Post Count Padder]

How about a little shock for Brian Roberts! I mean, Brian Roberts?!

Granted he's small, so wouldn't that make his 18 homers last year a little questionable? He also only hit 3 homers after the break.

 

Also, what about Jay Gibbons? He's always been a 20-25 homerun hitter, nothing special. A friend of mine guessed he might have taken steroids to help him heal faster from his injuries.

[CuseCubFan69]

How about a little shock for Brian Roberts! I mean, Brian Roberts?!

Granted he's small, so wouldn't that make his 18 homers last year a little questionable? He also only hit 3 homers after the break.

 

Also, what about Jay Gibbons? He's always been a 20-25 homerun hitter, nothing special. A friend of mine guessed he might have taken steroids to help him heal faster from his injuries.

 

Hitting 20-25 HR's is a lot better than 10-15. I don't think illegal drugs have to make you hit 50 or more all the time.

 

MLB sees only what they want to see when it comes to performance enhancing drugs. This is no surprise, you just don't throw like this at Clemens age and IMO the same might be able to said about Ryan too.

[SouthSideRyan]

Alex Sanchez was busted for steroids, HR totals does not = steroids.

[Laura]

The LA Times[/url]"] The U.S. attorney's office in San Francisco issued a statement Monday questioning the accuracy of a Los Angeles Times report published over the weekend. The story identified Major League Baseball players whose names had been blacked out of a drug investigation affidavit filed this year in federal court. ....

 

U.S. Atty. Kevin V. Ryan, who is leading the investigation, issued a brief statement Monday:

 

"In view of the recent reports purporting to identify certain athletes whose names had been redacted from the government's search warrant filings in the Grimsley matter, and in the interest of justice, please be advised that these reports contain significant inaccuracies."

 

Through a spokesman, Ryan declined to answer any questions and would not disclose what names, if any, or other aspects of the story were among the alleged significant inaccuracies.

 

The Times responded with its own statement late Monday: "We take seriously that the U.S. attorney's office has questioned our story. We are continuing to report on this important subject."

[Electron Blue]

Clemens and Pettite are officially Innocent in my mind. I'm open to changing it, if anything is proven.

 

But I really don't see a good reason to doubt Clemens' word at this point.

[goonys evil twin]

Clemens and Pettite are officially Innocent in my mind. I'm open to changing it, if anything is proven.

 

But I really don't see a good reason to doubt Clemens' word at this point.

 

I have thought Clemens was guilty for quite some time, and see no good reason to doubt his guilt. Pettite, not so much.