LOCK ME (3) Nirvana vs. (14) The Allman Bros.

[Derwood]

Nirvana vs. The Allman Bros.

 

vote for your fav.

Edited July 10, 2006 by Derwood

[Andy]

Nirvana will pose formidable opposition to anyone they face in this tourney.

[Shavo]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

[Derwood]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

 

Hater

[Drew Doughty]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

 

Hater

 

i agree with shavo.

[Derwood]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

 

Hater

 

i agree with shavo.

 

The Allmans may hold their own early, but Nirvana's 1-3-1 zone will be too much for Duane to handle.

[Shavo]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

 

Hater

 

Nirvana was a cancer to music. They shall FALL!

[Derwood]

I will vote against Nirvana every round.

 

Hater

 

Nirvana was a cancer to music. They shall FALL!

 

Nirvana saved us from a 1990/91 music scene that was dominated by C&C Music Factory, Snap and Amy Grant.

[Big Fergie J]

Tough luck in the draw for The Allman Brothers. They must have p***** off someone in the selection committee.

[soccer10k]

Nirvana will pose formidable opposition to anyone they face in this tourney.

 

Yes they shall. They have my vote for the first round.

[ConstableRabbit]

Im voting for nirvana, but the real question is how the Allman Bros are a 14 seed :shock:

[CoolHandLuke]

I hate nirvana.

[wolf stansson]

Screw Nirvana.

 

Most overrated band of all-time.

 

Kurt Cobain is so irritating.

[Balsa]

Question: What's the last thing that went through Kurt Cobain's head as he shot himself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer: His teeth! *Badum-chhh*

[lanalang]

Nirvana rocks

[Jazz]

Question: What's the last thing that went through Kurt Cobain's head as he shot himself?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer: His teeth! *Badum-chhh*

 

didn't quite get that

[vance_the_cubs_fan]

I'm not sure I can vote here. I dislike both, but my hatred of Nirvana wins out.

[ConstableRabbit]

I love both, but Nirvana haters should be introduced to the "With the Lights Out" boxed set. Its a much different look at the band than it's mainstream stuff

[Marco4]

I'm a Nirvana hater, too.

 

And then, in a twist of my own utter stupidity, I voted for them.

[noisesquared]

I find it odd that while the Beatles are so revered, Nirvana, who is also one of the most critically acclaimed bands of our lifetimes, gets bashed so repeatedly.

 

Personally, I'd rather listen to any Nirvana album than the best Beatles album.

[CardsFanInChiTown]

Nirvana is a band our children's children will find and listen to.

[Butterscup1679666578]

I find it odd that while the Beatles are so revered, Nirvana, who is also one of the most critically acclaimed bands of our lifetimes, gets bashed so repeatedly.

 

Personally, I'd rather listen to any Nirvana album than the best Beatles album.

 

Oh my. That is quite the statement.

[noisesquared]

I find it odd that while the Beatles are so revered, Nirvana, who is also one of the most critically acclaimed bands of our lifetimes, gets bashed so repeatedly.

 

Personally, I'd rather listen to any Nirvana album than the best Beatles album.

 

Oh my. That is quite the statement.

 

I was referring to this poll as far as the Beatle-love and the Nirvana-hate - I should've made that a little clearer :oops:

[wolf stansson]

I find it odd that while the Beatles are so revered, Nirvana, who is also one of the most critically acclaimed bands of our lifetimes, gets bashed so repeatedly.

 

Personally, I'd rather listen to any Nirvana album than the best Beatles album.

Because the Beatles were unlike any band before or after. They constantly reinvented themselves and still stayed relevant.

 

Nirvana was an outcome of good timing and good music video. Bands like the Pixies, The Smiths, Sonic Youth, and even Nirvana's contemporaries like Pearl Jam or Sound Garden are much better musically and had they had Nirvana's timing/video/publicist/lead singer's charisma they would have been bigger.

 

Nirvana was an image that kids liked. Their songs aren't even that good.

[noisesquared]

I find it odd that while the Beatles are so revered, Nirvana, who is also one of the most critically acclaimed bands of our lifetimes, gets bashed so repeatedly.

 

Personally, I'd rather listen to any Nirvana album than the best Beatles album.

Because the Beatles were unlike any band before or after. They constantly reinvented themselves and still stayed relevant.

 

Nirvana was an outcome of good timing and good music video. Bands like the Pixies, The Smiths, Sonic Youth, and even Nirvana's contemporaries like Pearl Jam or Sound Garden are much better musically and had they had Nirvana's timing/video/publicist/lead singer's charisma they would have been bigger.

 

Nirvana was an image that kids liked. Their songs aren't even that good.

 

I couldn't disagree more - and even if so the same could be said about the Beatles - their early popularity involved a lot of screaming teenagers IIRC.

 

The timing was right and the videos were good, but without the songs it wouldn't have mattered.