RandallPnkFloyd

Image courtesy of © Matt Marton-Imagn Images For about two full seasons, Drew Pomeranz was a steady-as-they-come major-league starter. Then came the struggles that resulted in a bullpen transition, where he spent another two years as one of the more dominant relief arms the game had to offer. Then came the injuries; then more injuries. Four years of injuries and subsequent minor-league deals later, Pomeranz is emerging as an important component of the 2025 Chicago Cubs. The sustainability of that importance, however, is a matter of some debate. Through eight appearances (7 2/3 innings), Pomeranz has yet to allow a run. His command has been excellent, with a 7.1% walk rate that is the lowest since he entered the league in 2011. Strikeouts are down from his previous work as a reliever, but still holding above his overall career average (28.6%). It's the underlying stuff, though, that is much more fascinating. In terms of sustainability, the top things you look for are generally contact rate, contact quality, batting average on balls in play, and strand rate. Even with those tools, though, it's hard to tell what's what when you're looking at a pitcher who has yet to allow a run as he nears double-digit appearances. Opposing hitters are swinging at pitches from Pomeranz exactly half the time. They're making contact at a 76.9% rate and posting a reasonable 37.5% hard-hit rate. They've managed a BABIP of just .150, with Pomeranz (obviously) sitting at a 100% strand rate. Given a somewhat high volume of contact juxtaposed with brutal batted-ball luck on the part of the opposition, one imagines regression is on the way. But that's not necessarily the source of any apprehension. Pomeranz has induced an expected batting average of just .181, and an expected ERA of 3.17. By being able to manage the quality of contact and generate a lot of flyballs, he can survive a profile slightly light on swing-and-miss. Instead, the bigger concern lies within the usage: When Pomeranz made the transition to the bullpen, he became a two-pitch guy. That's not at all an uncommon scenario for relievers. But the 70/30 split works better if a pitcher works at a higher velocity level than Pomeranz does. While Pomeranz has been able to generate swings on the knuckle-curve, he's not getting the results you'd hope from that pitch. It got lots of whiffs during his stint in the minors, but in the big leagues, he's yet to get even one swing and miss on it. He's also throwing it outside the strike zone almost 74 percent of the time in the majors. Obviously, with a pitch like that, part of the objective is to not hit the zone. But you need to mix it in there at least on occasion, to garner swings to get the whiff side activated. Again, that was happening in the minors, but it hasn't translated to the bigs so far. His movement profile is really illustrative: There's too little consistency in his curveball movement. That's why he's leaned harder on the heat and missed no bats with the hook since coming to the majors with the Cubs. It's that idea, alone, that has me a little bit apprehensive about how long this success can last. He, of course, has a track record of success—especially on the relief side. The movement from his fastball will help him remain effective. Perhaps he's able to regain some confidence in the breaking pitch. That would certainly serve him in factoring into not only this bullpen, but high-leverage situations. Until then, it's a middle-relief game. View full article

Image courtesy of © Gregory Fisher-Imagn Images The nature of baseball is such that discerning anything after three games is virtually impossible. Pete Crow-Armstrong might be giving us an exception. Over the winter, I floated the idea of the Chicago Cubs center fielder in the leadoff spot. I was hardly the only one. The justification was a combination of Crow-Armstrong's traditional skill set for the spot (read: he's fast), combined with the fact that Ian Happ's contract only runs through 2026. Thus, while it wasn't necessarily going to be in the cards for 2025, it's not unreasonable to foresee the team giving him some run there should Happ find himself on another roster in the not-too-distant future. An oblique injury to Happ is giving us our first look at just that scenario. Unfortunately, given Crow-Armstrong's penchant for swinging wildly, it's largely going about as expected. The trio of games in which he's hit out of the top spot has featured 13 plate appearances. Within that, he's recorded two hits (one home run) against six strikeouts. His slash reads .167/.231/.417, with a wRC+ of 80. His Swing% checks in at 60.3, his contact rate is 61.1%, and his whiff rate is 23.8%. Essentially, we're seeing the warts in his game become magnified when transitioning to a role in which on-base percentage becomes paramount. Not working in his favor is that Happ himself has evolved into the ideal leadoff hitter for this game. Despite the lowest power output of his career (.113 ISO), his .364 OBP is the highest of his career. The on-base outcomes, despite both modest power and speed, have allowed the larger bats down the lineup to generate runs with the fixture on the bases that Happ has become. With Crow-Armstrong, you're not getting that. While the approach has been better, per the eye test alone, he's still been prone to the same bouts of chase that we've seen in the past. It's why his overall swing and contact rates haven't changed that much. There's still a streakiness inherent in his game that makes him ill-suited for the role at present. The Cubs offense works because they're getting 'em on at the top and knocking 'em in from the middle. Crow-Armstrong's erratic approach strips you of that. It's not an unfounded decision by Craig Counsell—in theory, at least. Get one of your top hitters this year an extra appearance or two, while simultaneously hoping to catch a little lightning with the speed. It was also, in all likelihood, temporary by design. But in the wake of Happ's injury resulting in a stint on the injured list, the pivot to someone like Nico Hoerner (and his contact-oriented approach) might just be better. Crow-Armstrong simply isn't ready for this yet. View full article

Image courtesy of David Durochik/Diamond Images via Getty Images Under Jed Hoyer, the Chicago Cubs have been a mixed bag in matters of the draft. There have been some successes on both sides of the ball, mostly in the form of guys we think will be impactful in short order (Matt Shaw, Jordan Wicks, Luke Little, James Triantos, Brandon Birdsell). There have been some likely failures, too, where the hope doesn't ring through as strong (Burl Carraway, Ed Howard). Some draftees have been traded away. Others — including some those mentioned on either end of the above spectrum — have seen injuries stall their development. There have been some changes in the front office throughout his tenure, but the reality is that the draft hasn't been a source of talent acquisition for the big league level under Hoyer. The team's best work with young names in his time at the helm has come in the form of prospect acquisition via trade (Pete Crow-Armstrong, Ben Brown). Beyond Porter Hodge, we just haven't seen the wire-to-wire type of development that a team aiming for organizational stability would hope to demonstrate. Cade Horton can change that. And not just on the development side. With the confirmed arrival of the team's top pitching prospect this weekend, the current regime has an opportunity for the narrative to flip in their favor. Not only would Horton represent one of the very few that this front office has selected to reach that level, but he possesses the type of upside that even those they've acquired and developed (Brown, Hayden Wesneski, etc.) do not. You're talking about frontline starter potential. An upper-90s fastball combined with a wipeout slider combined with decent-enough tertiary offerings. There's likely something of a workload still to be built up, but nothing in his profile is like what the Cubs have featured in recent years. To have a pitcher of this caliber go start-to-finish within the system would be a monumental success for Hoyer & Co., especially when you factor in 2024's health setbacks. To say nothing of what it would mean in the present for the big league roster. They were already down Justin Steele. Now they're down Shota Imanaga. Ben Brown remains an iffy proposition depending on his command in a given start. The most stability you're getting out of the rotation right now comes from Matthew Boyd, who is outpitching a number of his peripherals. Horton's arrival (and, ideally, his success) would be a morale boost to the pitching staff. Imanaga's IL placement and the 14-5 loss to San Francisco still linger. They're not healthy. The bullpen — while better than it was at the start of the season — remains at least somewhat unstable. Getting Horton out there against major league hitting with a legitimate chance at sticking around long-term is massive. For Jed Hoyer, and the perception of the front office at large, Horton's debut could signal the health of this organization in the immediate future. No pressure, though. View full article

Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-Imagn Images In the wake of the Chicago Cubs' failed pursuit of Alex Bregman, the signing of Justin Turner to a one-year deal was largely viewed as a positive. Despite some declining elements of his game, a veteran hitter committed to the craft looked to be a quality addition to a group in need of some supplementation off the bench. "Despite" is doing a lot of work in the previous sentence, however. And while there are certainly some unquantifiable components that he brings to what has been one of the league's most successful offenses, those initial concerns we had around Turner are manifesting at their maximum—which, obviously, isn't a good thing. Turner's slash on the year includes a mere .170 batting average. He's reaching base at just a .270 clip, even with a reasonable 11.1% walk rate. It's not like the skill set is entirely diminished within that. Particularly from a cerebral standpoint. Turner's approach remains ever-solid, with chase and contact rates that are fairly in line with what he's turned in over the past handful of seasons. From a pure discipline standpoint, he's been exactly as advertised. But one of the main caveats with signing Turner was that you weren't getting the actual hitter that he'd been in years past. That's not a shocking statement, given that you're talking about a 40-year-old hitter. Bat speed falls off a cliff in one's late 30s. There are ways to work around that. In Turner's case, though, it's become a real issue. While a high volume of impact wasn't necessarily expected, the Cubs are getting no impact out of their veteran infielder. The eye test alone could tell you that, but the numbers do, too: Nor is it any kind of mystery. Turner's bat speed is in its third (well, probably more than that, but we only have data for three) consecutive year of decline, to the point where it's the seventh-slowest of hitters with at least 50 swings on their ledger. His rate of fast swings (classified as any swing over 75 MPH) is a literal 0.0%. To see that lack of hard contact depicted above continue its decline is just verification of what anyone who has watched him swing a bat this year already knew to be true. Making matters worse is how much of that contact is on the ground. Exactly half of Turner's balls in play are of the groundball variety. That both is and is not surprising. On one hand, Turner isn't swinging in the portions of the zone designed to general groundball contact: But on the other, he's just late. He's a catch-it-out-front guy, but in just under two years, he's gone from hitting it 39 inches from his own center of mass to making contact at 34 inches. A deeper contact point is a bad sign, for the guy who made "gaining ground on the pitch" a famous mindset in the modern game. It's all wrought by Turner's poor bat speed. That the approach and contact trends remain in his favor provides some value, I suppose. But when you're generating virtually nothing when the ball winds up in play, a real problem presents itself. The Cubs signed Turner not just to contribute off the bench, but to shield Michael Busch (and, more indirectly, guys like Gage Workman or Nicky Lopez) from facing lefties. As good as Busch has looked, he still has just 19 plate appearances against southpaws. Turner's been the only alternative they've really explored, despite a wRC+ of just 53 against lefties. No immediate solution has presented itself in Turner's stead. He's going to remain on this roster, as long as there's an absence of approach-oriented veteran hitters available. The money the team spent on him helps ensure that, but since neither Workman nor Matt Shaw proved able to do anything useful early on, there's also no one around you'd rather have take those chances. Nor is anyone in a hurry to push the beloved Turner out through the back clubhouse door. But aside from whatever intangible qualities he's providing, there simply is not a lot he does for the roster at present. It's a problem. But unlike the Cubs' marquee veteran with already-alarming peripherals on the mound, it's one without an immediate solution. View full article

Image courtesy of © Matt Marton-Imagn Images Dansby Swanson is at it again. This is roughly the third time in a calendar month that we're talking about the offensive side of the Chicago Cubs' glove-first shortstop. While the season thus far has worn on barely longer than that, it's the third time he's demonstrated a marked change in his approach to hitting. When we last saw Swanson, he was struggling. The strikeout rate had skyrocketed, largely due to Swanson's overeager hunt for the fastball. Not only was he sitting on that pitch, he was swinging at it with little regard for where it was within (or outside of) the strike zone. It reached a point where a seven-game stretch saw roughly a 50% strikeout rate. Within that stretch, he only mustered four hits. We're barely 10 games clear of that run, but things have already shifted for Swanson yet again—to the point where he's sort of mashing. In his last 11 games, Swanson's slash includes a .357 average, a .386 OBP, and a .286 ISO. His 187 wRC+ is easily pacing what has been a wildly successful group of Cubs hitters in those contests. (Ian Happ is second, at 150.) There's been some substantial batted-ball luck, courtesy of a .444 BABIP, but he also continues to drive the ball (40.0 Hard-Hit%) and has gotten the launch angle down toward creating more line drive contact (11.8° is roughly a 5° drop from his 2025 average). Ultimately, though, we can attribute this stretch to a simple tamping down of the zone expansion. When Swanson expands his zone, he gets himself into trouble. When he's disciplined, he's good. That sounds too simple, but it's true—and even truer of Swanson than of most players. It's not a perfect correlation, given the steady drop in chase rate and the sudden spike in offensive production, but the evidence is highly suggestive. Because Swanson has a swing geared for in-zone damage but is prone to whiffs even within the zone, it's especially valuable to him when he keeps the edges of the zone well—and especially deleterious when he lets them get fuzzy. While this surge is definitely encouraging, it's not as if we should expect it to be the new and permanent norm. The strikeout rate has still been north of 28% over this more recent stretch. He's still whiffing at a huge rate when he does chase. Those issues were present the last time we took a look at Swanson's offensive game, and are still salient—but their side effects have been mitigated because he's started to calm down the element that gives them such potency when he does slump: that tendency to chase. Given those still-existent factors, the last two stretches of play for Swanson might be indicative of what we might continue to see in 2025. When he has the plate discipline somewhat reined in, he should produce impressively. In those periods where he's opening up the zone more frequently, the dips are going to continue to manifest. This is why he was known, long before he even signed this seven-year deal with the Cubs, as one of the league's streakiest hitters. It's who he is. If Swanson can layer this development with either some additional contact outside the zone or (at least) a modest increase on fastballs away from the zone, then maybe we're having a more optimistic conversation. In the interim, though, we should probably expect continued variance. That's why it's so important that the team keep him surrounded with great offensive talent, as he has been all year. View full article

Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-Imagn Images No team in baseball features a better trio on the outfield grass than the Chicago Cubs. There isn't a whole lot of room for debate here, either. As a group, the Cubs' outfield ranks first in fWAR (5.0), well ahead of the New York Yankees (4.2) and even farther ahead of the Boston Red Sox (3.0). While it would be an oversimplification to attribute the team's early success specifically and solely to that group (given the success of Michael Busch and the tandem of Miguel Amaya and Carson Kelly behind the plate), it's certainly been the outfield leading the way. This was always possible, but it was far from guaranteed, so seeing it come to fruition is as encouraging as it is satisfying. The acquisition of Kyle Tucker was obviously a boon. With such little positional flexibility when the offseason began, moving Cody Bellinger out of town and finding a suitable replacement for Seiya Suzuki's glove in right represented one of the only paths toward legitimate addition within the lineup. Tucker has been crucial to the team's early run to the top of the National League Central, but it's been far from the only element driving the offensive (and defensive, for that matter) pace thus far. In addition to pacing the league in fWAR, the Cubs' outfield leads the league in isolated slugging (.236) and strikeout rate (16.5%), while sitting top five in batting average (.291), on-base percentage (.367), and stolen bases (21). Their 22 home runs are tied with the Yankees atop the leaderboard, as well. To say that it's a potent group would be an understatement. Tucker has been as advertised. Plenty of ink is still to be spilt over the team's efforts to retain their new-ish superstar, but even with a little bit of a recent "cold" streak, he's still a top-10 position player in most categories. His 168 wRC+ ranks seventh, while his walk rate (15.3%) continues to outpace his strikeout rate (11.7%). While Tucker had the ability to raise the floor of what this group could produce, it's been Pete Crow-Armstrong who has pushed the ceiling upward. Not all of the stats look great. He's still reaching base at a barely a .300 clip, but he's tamped down the strikeouts on his way to producing a 139 wRC+. That's all despite a very cold start. The power has really manifested, to the tune of a .287 ISO that even narrowly surpasses that of Tucker (.285). We knew the speed would be there, and lo: 12 steals. The mildly ironic thing is that the star-level play we see from each of Tucker and Crow-Armstrong on a daily basis has overshadowed the contributions of Ian Happ atop the lineup. He's running a 120 wRC+, with virtually no power to speak of (.102 ISO). Generally a slow starter, that Happ is already a worthy contributor without the power (which we don't typically see until May, anyway) really gets moving speaks to the actual ceiling of this group. Then there's the defensive component. The Cubs lead the league with 10 Defensive Runs Saved in the outfield, even with Tucker rating a bit below average. It helps that Crow-Armstrong is jumping his way to covering more ground than almost any individual outfielder in baseball, but Happ's defense looks legitimately good in the face of metrics that have soured on him throughout his Gold Glove run. It's the combination of offense and defense that has given the Cubs two of the nine most valuable players in baseball—and we're not just talking outfielders. There are 162 qualifying position players in the league. Crow-Armstrong ranks third in FanGraphs WAR, and Tucker sits ninth. Happ's farther down the list, at 63rd, but it's nearly impossible to overstate the level at which this outfield has performed. They've been much-needed, too. While catcher (Amaya/Kelly) and first base (Busch) both sit in the top seven in positional value, the middle infield spots have both been middle-of-the-road. Third base is near the bottom of the league (28th). Seiya Suzuki's phenomenal production as the DH is vital, but since his defensive homes are in the outfield, he feels like an extension of that corps. Consider some of the groups that were projected to be among the best in the league on the grass in the National League alone. Arizona. San Diego. Milwaukee. FanGraphs's preseason positional power rankings had the Cubs eighth in left field, 12th in center, and fifth in right. They've blown them all away. And then you get into the value of pushing Suzuki into a full-time role as the designated hitter. It's this group that has not only made the Cubs into a legitimate NL contender, but a singularly watchable winner. After a handful of years of middle-tier, outright boring baseball, the Cubs have become one of the most exciting teams in the sport on the strength of their outfield. View full article

Image courtesy of © Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images Through April 20, you'd have been hard-pressed to find a better hitter in the National League than Kyle Tucker. After a brutal spring, the Chicago Cubs' superstar came out hot, with a slash that included a .302 average and .404 on-base percentage. His ISO checked in at .313 (six homers) with baserunning efficiency to match the power (four steals). That's to say nothing of a strikeout rate (12.3%) that came in at a clip below his walk rate (14.9%). Since that point, however, Tucker has been... not that. In the seven games from April 21-30, Tucker's wRC+ sat at just 87. He hit .192/.323/.308. It's not an ideal stretch, given how strong the Cubs' offense has been going, and the extent to which that dominance relied upon Tucker's production. But even with a late April swoon, the team is still getting plenty of value out of his bat, and there were indications that he'd pull out of it quickly, all along. Logically, let's talk about that latter point first. Tucker's BABIP over the seven games in question (.190) indicates some brutal batted-ball luck. There isn't a ton in his batted-ball profile to suggest he was doing anything terribly differently. His swing and contact rates looked quite similar in that first stretch versus the more recent one. His approach to the zone has been consistent, and there's plenty of variance in the types of pitches at which he's swinging: If there was any discernible trend, it would likely be the result of pitch types, since his zone approach hasn't fluctuated in any perceptible manner. But, as pictured above, no such trend exists. Plenty of variance exists in the last handful of games, just as it did earlier in the month—which is to say, we have really no reason to be concerned about Tucker, given some of the underlying factors. That was underscored when he took Paul Skenes deep Thursday, even if three other well-struck balls went for outs on the day. The more important note, for our purposes at present, goes back to that first point: the fact that even a slumping Kyle Tucker is one capable of contributing plenty to the team's offense. Tucker's trend of having a walk rate higher than his strikeout rate remained intact. Even through a tough stretch, he struck out at just a 12.9% rate, against a 16.1% clip for walks. He's also stolen another four bases. That he's still able to contribute to the offense while not experiencing any level of luck when actually putting the ball in play says a lot about the caliber of hitter he is. And this isn't a new type of thing from him, either. If anything, it's a hallmark. Per Stathead, there are 133 instances of Tucker having a seven-game stretch in which he hit under .195. He's walked at least twice in such stretches almost 70 percent of the time, and has stolen at least one base in well over half of them. They don't all look quite as good as far as the OBP component goes, but it speaks to his overall development into the star that he is. Only 16 of the 110 total instances where he featured an OBP under .300 in one of these stretches have come in the two years prior to 2025. It's difficult to recall a hitter in even recent memory who was able to provide actual offensive value, even when working through a questionable stretch. Prime Anthony Rizzo is probably our best recent example, with an even greater stockpile of .300+ OBP runs in low batting average stretches (but also a higher volume of seven-game stretches under .195). Kyle Schwarber was able to do it occasionally (but has done it more since leaving). Aramis Ramírez did it a handful of times. Derrek Lee had a few. Suffice to say, it's been a minute since the Cubs had a hitter showcase the type of balance in working through a tough stretch while still staying afloat in the offensive contributions department. It's not like we needed additional reasons to stockpile as to why having (and keeping!) a hitter like Kyle Tucker is such an imperative to a team like the Cubs. But here's another one. View full article

Image courtesy of © David Banks-Imagn Images That Pete Crow-Armstrong is perhaps the best defender in baseball should be a shock to no one. We knew that in his years as a prospect. The glove was going to play at a high level, no matter what. Concerns about the bat? Sure. But elite sprint speed and top-tier defensive instincts (to say nothing of what he brings on the basepaths) were giving you a three- or four-win player, almost regardless of offensive outcomes. The bat almost becomes a bonus, given those other factors. As he approaches 175 big-league games, there hasn't been anything to deter us from buying into that narrative. By Fielding Run Value (FRV), Crow-Armstrong was the second-most valuable defender in the sport last year, with his mark of 16 tying Daulton Varsho and Jacob Young to trail only Patrick Bailey's 22. Thirteen of that came from his range, as he deployed his sheer speed in the most effective fashion. Yet, there was still (somehow) another level to be reached—a level where he's not only making exceptional plays look easy, but he's making them actually routine. MLB.com's Mike Petriello covered as much in an analysis centered around Crow-Armstrong's outfield jump, in particular. Therein, he covers a number of different catches that Crow-Armstrong has made on the run this season. Those range in catch probability from 10 percent to 45 percent. Petriello's piece even includes video of plays that Crow-Armstrong, specifically, has made against other defenders who have failed to make similar ones. None of the plays required a highlight-reel catch, either. Just an exceptional jump: It's difficult to overstate just how crucial the jump is. Only Boston's Ceddanne Rafaela features a better jump than Crow-Armstrong's 4.8 feet. As Petriello notes, jump is measured as feet in the correct direction in the first three seconds after the release of the pitch. You're laying a fairly significant foundation with an impactful jump. His is nearly five feet better than the average outfielder. Then you add in what's currently checking in as 96th percentile sprint speed. It's unreal. Given that, Crow-Armstrong is recording outs at a rate nine percent above expected. The estimated success rate on balls hit in his direction this year is 87 percent. But he's closing them out at a 96 percent clip. The route—which Petriello notes is a shortcoming of not only Crow-Armstrong, but other elite defenders—becomes immaterial when the jump is combined with the speed. Turns out, you can compensate for a lot when you're reacting and moving that quickly with your initial read. But it's not just about making the play. Recording the out is important on its own, of course. When you're able to establish yourself as the defender making that play on your feet and under control, though, you're able to avoid some of the physical danger that comes with the territory of outfield defense. Risky dives resulting in shoulder or wrist injuries? Out. Slides in which you get your ankle caught under you? Out. Collisions wrought by uncertainty over who has the cleaner path to the catch? Out. Even more so with a pair of savvy defenders bookending Crow-Armstrong in Ian Happ and Kyle Tucker. The result is fewer catches that make the SportsCenter Top 10 (aside: is that even a thing anymore?), but allows for much more sustainability—both in the certainty of the play in itself, and in the long-term outcomes associated with health in avoiding the riskier options. To the untrained eye, it may be less visually appealing. But if there's a player who can make an exceptional jump and quick path look as exciting as a full-extension layout, Pete Crow-Armstrong is probably the guy to do it. In the meantime, this increased suavity makes him less likely to get hurt playing even superb defense. That counts for just as much as the extra catch or two he makes per week. View full article

Alex Bregman never walked through that door. Matt Shaw had to be demoted, and Gage Workman is on the other side of town. The Chicago Cubs are on Plan D at third base, and it shows. Those are the types of things you risk when you don't have a full-time third baseman on the roster. Thus far, the Cubs have seen five different players man third base. Shaw got 18 appearances prior to his demotion to Iowa, Jon Berti's at 11, Gage Workman had seven before being cut, and each of Bruján and Justin Turner have appeared there twice. Berti is at -1 FRV, as was Workman before he flipped over to the South Side. Shaw, representing the largest sample (141 innings) checked in at -2. It's something you can stomach a little more if you're getting offensive production. The Cubs are not. Third base, in total, has posted a 57 wRC+ for them through 34 games. Again, it's hardly a surprise. Unless Shaw popped, you weren't expecting much out of the position. That's why the team wanted Bregman badly, but it's also fair to note that they declined to make a desperate lunge to finish a deal with him. They trusted Shaw, more than they should have. Given that, we're probably looking at a situation where the Cubs are going to need to prioritize the defensive side a little more. Whether that's giving one of those guys more of a full-time look or looking at external options isn't my call to make. But given Sunday's specific context and the bigger-picture defensive output from the position, it looks likely to keep presenting itself for further discussion. View full article

How much value is there in being Luis Arraez? Cubs infielder Nico Hoerner is running some experiments to find out. Image courtesy of © Kamil Krzaczynski-Imagn Images I love a paradox. There's something poetic about two things that don't necessarily work together (but also somehow do?). Lucky for me, I spend my time (outside of the classroom, anyway) covering baseball, a sport absolutely dripping with various contradictions. I explored as much fairly recently, in Kyle Tucker's approach to the offspeed pitch, but he's far from the only one plying that trade for the 2025 Chicago Cubs. Nico Hoerner hasn't always been a paradoxical player, but his evolution has drawn him in that direction. He's the contact-oriented guy with no power to speak of, to the point where even the barrel of the bat remains elusive. Hoerner has largely fit this archetype for most of his career: his best isolated slugging was a mere .129 back in 2022. But he's entrenched himself into that type of skill set even more as time has worn on. When Hoerner was selected out of Stanford, this type of player wasn't something entirely expected. In fact, MLB Pipeline's scouting report back in 2019 reported the following: Fifteen homers per season? Since his arrival at the top level that year, Hoerner topped out at 10 (2022). Since then, he's hit 9 (2023) and 7 (2024), and he has zero on the 2025 campaign thus far. Instead of Ian Kinsler—a common comp for him as a prospect—Hoerner's game has become something more akin to Luis Arraez—with (somehow) even less power. Don't get it twisted. The contact skills are elite. The rarified air of Hoerner's 2025 contact rate (91.6%) has him in league with Arraez (96.9) and Steven Kwan (92.6). Rookie shortstop Jacob Wilson (92.0) has also shoehorned himself into that elite group, leaving Hoerner's Contact% as the fourth-best in the league. He's more than 1% clear of Milwaukee's Sal Frelick and Arizona's Geraldo Perdomo, who round out the top six. That Hoerner finds himself in such a group shouldn't be a surprise. His contact rate has risen, if only by a shred, each year he's been in the league. That comes with the combination of a swing rate that has risen in three consecutive years and a whiff rate that has been falling since 2021. That latter rate (Whiff%) is currently at a career-best 4.2% of all the pitches he sees, leaving him in the 99th percentile. He's simply become one of the best in the business in putting the bat on the baseball. But how much value lies there? That is a valid question. Sure, you can make contact all day and put balls in play, but when you've got 8th-percentile bat speed, you're not walking, and you're not driving the ball, what are you adding to the lineup? As a hitter, Hoerner is doing exactly what he should be doing to maximize his output. Already without a bunch of swing-and-miss in his game, Hoerner's rare moments of "impact" have come against offspeed pitches. He's attacking those pitches to a greater degree than ever: But, to our earlier point, there isn't a ton of impact here. Hoerner's ISO on the season checks in at just .061 and he has yet to record a Statcast Barrel. The lack of bat speed—which has always been present and doesn't appear to be a result of offseason forearm surgery—will likely continue to pin him down from a productivity standpoint. Luckily for Hoerner, his speed and baserunning allow him to continue to maintain value. Even with questionable quality-of-contact outcomes, he's still at a .307 average on balls in play thus far. His 15.6% infield hit rate (the percentage of all his ground balls that become infield hits) is a career high. So while he's putting the ball on the ground in the middle of this exceptional contact volume, it isn't quite holding him back from being a fixture on the bases (.327 OBP to date). When that characteristic starts to wane, though, there could be some cause for concern in his ability to reach base as a contact-only guy. It will wane, too. No one had an infield hit rate north of 12.7% last season. And luckily for the Cubs at large, it's unlikely that this means anything for the 2025 campaign. The Cubs land on the higher end of the contact spectrum, and with the team generating a bit of power in the bottom half of the order (courtesy of Pete Crow-Armstrong's surge and the combination of Miguel Amaya and Carson Kelly from behind the plate), Hoerner's contact is a boon for overall run production. The metrics don't love his skill set from a park-adjusted standpoint. Hoerner's wRC+ is at 92. His OPS+ is at 94. If you're looking at catch-all figures that flatter his overall value, you're likely not going to find it. But for what the Cubs have around him, it's working. The contact volume, combined with what he brings defensively, allow him to maintain value in that grander context. He's become an increasingly rare archetype among major-league hitters. It's not always going to work, but it'll do for now. View full article

Pitching moves were expected. Position player moves... less so. Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images In between games of their quick two-game series with the Los Angeles Dodgers, the Chicago Cubs shuffled the roster around a little bit. Just not quite in the way that we thought they would: The pitching side of things was noted earlier this week. With the Cubs acquiring Drew Pomeranz and his upward mobility clause on Monday of this week, the initial report was that he'd be called up to the big club on Wednesday. That's come to fruition with his selection from Iowa and the subsequent placing of Justin Steele on the 60-day IL. Steele, of course, will miss the rest of the 2025 season after undergoing elbow surgery. Also notable within the pitching transactions is the quick option of Gavin Hollowell back to Iowa. Hollowell made his first appearance of 2025 on Tuesday night, flashing a new arm slot and holding things down for two crucial innings in the Cubs' comeback win over the Dodgers. Given the outcomes there, it probably won't be long before we see him again. Pomeranz, though, will give manager Craig Counsell a fresh arm from the left side to work with for at least the next handful of days. Obviously, the most pressing news from Sahadev Sharma is the signing of infielder Nicky Lopez to a Major League deal. Lopez, you'll remember, was with the Cubs in spring training, but opted out of his deal once it became clear that Vidal Bruján and Gage Workman were ahead of him in the utility infielder game. He caught on with the Los Angeles Angels in Zach Neto's absence. With Neto returning over the weekend, Lopez was sent back out and elected free agency. Lopez had a really strong spring for the Cubs (195 wRC+ in 24 PA), but his bat has consistently been below average (with the exception of a 104 wRC+ back in 2021). He does bring a lot versatility to the infield. Given Workman's broad struggles with strikeouts and recent struggles with the glove (especially on Tuesday), there's an element of stability that Lopez can bring to the group. It's an unfortunate development for Workman, in particular, as we couldn't remotely classify this as a legitimate run. He had a fantastic spring but was unable to find consistent opportunity with Matt Shaw in front of him to start the year. The small sample wasn't nearly enough to warrant a longer run with the roster, however. At least, not for a team pressing for early wins in a schedule as tough as this. He'll head to waivers and, if he gets through, will be offered back to Detroit, his original, pre-Rule 5 team. Shaw, of course, is not ready to return to the big leagues just yet. He has just one hit in 13 at-bats since returning to Triple-A Iowa and is still in search of the confidence that made him one of the best prospects in all of baseball. He'll be back at some point in 2025, but it may not be soon. So, then, where do the Cubs go from here at the hot corner? All of Jon Berti , Bruján, and (technically) Justin Turner can handle the position, but that triumvirate isn't exactly going to solve the team's offensive woes at third base. Turner has a .412 OPS and looks like he'll be the next to go when the Cubs need a free roster spot, while Berti and Bruján are far more valuable as versatile chess pieces off the bench, rather than everyday starters. Perhaps Lopez, with enough playing time, can prove his spring training performance wasn't all that much of a fluke. We're not going to pretend like this roster shuffling changes much for the Cubs in the grand scheme of things, of course. You've replaced one light-hitting utility infielder with another. But Lopez is certainly a more seasoned version of Workman, given the lengthier run he's gotten at the top level since 2019. Now back in the fold, he does at least combine with Bruján and Berti to give the Cubs one of the more versatile bench groups in all of baseball. And that's probably going to be necessary for this next stretch of baseball given the remaining vacancy at third base. View full article

The shape of the barrel feels a lot less important if you don't put any of the bat on the ball. Image courtesy of © Denis Poroy-Imagn Images An anecdote: I swung a torpedo bat for the first time on Monday. For some reason, one of my JV players acquired one at the earliest possible moment. I found that it was easier to find the barrel, but the weight distribution was quite a bit different. And when I didn't find the barrel, I found more pain in my hands than with a traditional barrel. In short, it's something that clearly requires significant adjustment and isn't going to be an appropriate tool for everyone. Not that that's new information. For those 72 hours during which the baseball world was abuzz with discourse regarding the new bat shape, the prevailing opinion likened it to a club fitting in golf. Nor do we suspect that Dansby Swanson came out to start the year swinging it for the first time in his career. Ultimately, there's some indication that it's serving him well, although it also doesn't seem that he's using it all the time. Meanwhile, there's a segment of Swanson's game that is going terribly wrong and rendering those benefits rather hollow—which his bat had better not be, that would be illegal and not very effective. The last time I wrote on Swanson, his slash included a .211 average and a .281 on-base percentage, but the underlying data was encouraging. Each of those trends has gone in starkly opposite directions. In the 10 days since I wrote that piece, Swanson's average has plummeted further, to just .177, while he's scratching out a meager .223 OBP. His ISO, which sat at .263 back then, currently checks in at .167. The strikeout rate has ballooned from 18.5% at that point to 28.8% now. It's that last fact that has us most concerned for Swanson moving forward. The 18.5% figure came in at the 67th percentile. It's now in the 17th. The Cubs have played seven games since that last Swanson examination. Across that stretch (31 plate appearances), Swanson has 4 hits. He's struck out 15 times. For those not well-versed in mathematics, Swanson has struck out nearly half the time in his last seven games. It sucks. So what, exactly, is going wrong? Many of Swanson's contact trends remain the same (including an actual increase on Contact% inside the strike zone) and his Hard-Hit% (52.9) is in the 87th percentile. His BABIP has come up somewhat (.206), and he's driving the ball in the air. Many of his outcomes are indicative of a player that should be far better on the stat sheet. There's just one massive problem: when he expands his zone, it's a bloodbath. Chase is a natural component to the approach for most hitters. Few can minimize chase in favor of in-zone swings and, thus, more production (hello, Kyle Tucker). Swanson has a 24.9 Chase% for his career. This year, it's at 26.1%. That's... not really a notable increase. What is notable, however, is what is happening when he does chase. Swanson's contact rate on pitches outside of the strike zone checks in at an appalling 34.0 percent. That's down from 50.4 percent last year and 52.4 percent for his career. And it somehow gets more concerning. Swanson is not only chasing fastballs at a higher frequency, he's missing them: Opposing pitchers are missing the zone at a 42.5 percent rate with fastballs. Swanson is swinging at such pitches 30.6 percent of the time. That's a big ol' jump from last season, when he chased fastballs just 19.9 percent of the time. The overall O-Contact% is, quite obviously, concerning, but to be missing fastballs to that extent really sets off alarm bells. He seems to have gotten better at identifying offspeed stuff—or at least, he's sitting more eagerly on the fastball—because he's swinging less often on offspeed pitches and more often on fastballs, regardless of location. If he's sitting on the fastball and seeing it well, maybe this will just require him to temper his aggressiveness when pitchers take him out of the zone with it—but you'd hope to see more contact on it, given his apparent approach. There are other factors contributing to the slump in which Swanson finds himself currently mired. Wrigley tamping down right-handed hitters against his rise in flyballs is an easy one. But the inability to generate any kind of contact outside of the zone represents perhaps the largest and most concerning component of his April. Is he just out of sorts? Is the torpedo throwing off balance and showing us both sides of the spectrum? It's unfortunate, because the actual batted-ball outcomes are quite good. But if Swanson isn't generating contact, he's generating nothing. If he's locking in on a particular pitch type in order to do more damage when he gets it, he'll have to make better swing decisions even upon identifying that pitch. Otherwise, a partial retreat to a more balanced attack is in order. View full article