RandallPnkFloyd

They say you have to bat in more than you let in. At catcher, you also have to get to second more often than you let the other team take it. Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images Midway through February, we took a look at the Chicago Cubs' potential distribution of playing time for their two catchers. As we prepare for the season-opening two-game set in Tokyo (with an eye on domestic Opening Day, just over a week away), has anything changed on that front? Since the signing of Carson Kelly back in December, we've known that he'd be in something of a timeshare with the twam's young incumbent, Miguel Amaya. While we still aren't sure of the exact distribution, we at least have a level of certainty in what each provides. Amaya presents the higher upside at the plate, while Kelly is better behind it. But from February through our current, amorphous stage of the exhibition season, it's been a little unclear as to exactly what the split will look like. They could be attached to specific pitchers or specific matchups. To that end, though, the depth charts across the landscape still look virtually the same as they did a month ago. Baseball Prospectus has Amaya at 50 percent of the playing time, to Kelly's 45%; FanGraphs is at 51% for Amaya and 47% for Kelly. The only change is a barely perceptible increase for each of them in the latter, with Moises Ballesteros's previous glimpse of a chance for time behind the plate disappearing entirely. While it's difficult to project exactly who gets the nod on a given day (at least until we start to see a trend with specific arms), one has to wonder what impact the schedule could have on the playing time split in the early going. At one point, it felt somewhat safe to assume Amaya would maintain an edge, given his offensive growth and longer tenure in the clubhouse, but as we reach the point where looking at the schedule becomes a worthwhile thing (and not something happening in the distant abstract), the quality of baserunning in their opponents could have something to say about who's behind the dish with more regularity. The two games in Tokyo notwithstanding, the Cubs will open the season with four games against the Diamondbacks in Arizona. Beyond that, notable April tilts for our discussion here include six against the San Diego Padres, five more against the Dodgers, another three against the Diamondbacks at Wrigley, and the Philadelphia Phillies for three. In May, they'll get Milwaukee for three, Cincinnati for five, and Miami for six. Those games account for 35 of the team's first 56 games (again, not including the two in Tokyo). What makes those opponents particularly notable, though, is that each finished in the top half of the league in steals last year. The Brewers, Reds, and Phillies each finished in the top six, with the Dodgers at 10th. Each of the Marlins, Padres, and Diamondbacks fitted themselves into the top 15. It's worth noting that the Cubs will also play the New York Mets and Pittsburgh Pirates in the season's first two months. Those clubs finished 16th and 17th in steals, respectively, in 2024. There's also a discernible gap between the No. 15 team in Arizona, who finished with 119 steals, and the Mets and Pirates, who each came in at 106. They'll also play the Giants and White Sox (much less adept teams when it comes to the running game) by the end of May. Some of the teams at the back end of the league's top half for steals last year, like Arizona, also feature a certain level of efficiency. While the Padres sat 14th, for example, they also had an 81% success rate on their attempts. The Snakes were at 80%. It's not just that the Cubs are going to face teams with high-volume steal numbers early in the year. They're also going against teams that are legitimately good at it, without a whole lot of roster turnover in that aspect of their game. (Heck, most of the league is good at stealing, these days, thanks to the altered rule set that has launched so many steals the last two years.) Does that mean we should expect the Cubs to deploy Kelly more often, to defend against the running game early on? Kelly's Caught Stealing Above Average sat at 4, which landed him in the league's top 10. His 1.97-second average pop time ranked only 47th, but still came in above average. Amaya finished 53rd (-3) and 79th (2.04) in the two categories. Not that this is new information. We know Kelly to be more skilled behind the plate in general, but especially in matters of thwarting would-be thieves. On a Marquee broadcast earlier this spring, Craig Counsell was asked how he envisions this positional timeshare playing out. He estimated that it would be an even split, but he'll be noting the matchups against certain teams and their top threats to steal early. We could, therefore, see the veteran Kelly get more than half the starts over that stretch. While the distribution will likely even out over the course of a full season (especially if Amaya's bat ends up hot), the schedule early on could have more to say about the distribution of the time than we might've initially thought. View full article

The Cubs' Rule 5 draft pick is establishing himself as a keeper in spring training. How far should the team be willing to go to keep him on the roster? Image courtesy of Matt Dirksen/Chicago Cubs/Getty Images The Chicago Cubs entered the spring exhibition slate with a steady backlog of bench options. This jam was the result not of legitimate options holding Major League track records, but of light-hitting, at-one-point-possessing-offensive-upside, versatile names sprinkled throughout the spring invites. That logjam was cleared up somewhat with the reassignment of Nicky Lopez to minor league camp over the weekend. Lopez is expected to pivot toward an opt-out in the coming weeks and explore other opportunities to nab a utility job. With that reassignment, though, we have a clearer picture of the bench group bound for Japan this week. Given the reassignment, it’s now a group that will include Rule 5 selection Gage Workman. With Carson Kelly, Jon Berti, and Justin Turner all already locked into bench spots, the Arizona State product had been battling the likes of Lopez and Vidal Bruján for a utility spot on the roster. To say nothing of outfield depth options like Travis Jankowski and Greg Allen. While the slightly expanded rosters permitted upon the international contest will give the Cubs a longer runway to make their decision between Workman and, ultimately, Bruján, the decision to hold onto Workman for the immediate future speaks to not only his spring performance, but to the upside he possesses. To this point in the spring, Workman has turned in a .414/.455/.759/1.213 line across 33 plate appearances. He’s struck out at a 21.2 percent clip while walking 9.1 percent of the time. His ISO for the exhibition season checks in at a wild .345, with a pair of steals to compliment the power. In short, he’s been spectacular. A small sample, but very much worthy of praise given the context in which he’s performed (as a Rule 5 position player without an inning above Double-A to his name). And make no mistake, this is a guy who does still possess offensive upside. He repeated Double-A in 2024 after making the transition from switch hitting to a full-time left-handed stroke. With the Tigers’ affiliate in Erie, his ’24 slash included a .280 average and .366 OBP, with a .197 ISO that was his highest since High-A back in 2021. The strikeout rate did remain high (27.5 percent), but came down off the 33.7 K% he’d posted between High-A & Double-A in 2023. The strikeouts remain the most damning component of his game. Contact becomes especially important when you’re talking about a bench bat operating within a smaller sample than a positional regular. When you consider his more recent string of success, though (which also included a decrease in the overall strikeout numbers), you have to consider Workman to be the more interesting bench option over his counterpart in Bruján. A veteran of parts of four separate Major League seasons, Bruján hasn’t come close to showcasing the same type of ability at the plate that Workman has in the last calendar year. He makes more contact overall, but when you combine a low quality of contact with heavy groundball tendencies, the two work to cancel each other out. It’s not as if he’s more of a threat on the bases, either. Despite three minor league seasons with over 40 swipes, Workman has three of at least 30 to his own credit. If there’s an advantage we could attach to Bruján, it’s that he’s played centerfield throughout his career. The Cubs have only Jon Berti who could step into the role should Pete Crow-Armstrong miss time for any reason. However, the team has also mixed Workman onto the outfield grass. One imagines his athleticism could suit him for the role in short stints as well as it could Bruján. The pitting of Workman against Bruján is simply due to the fact that one will be on the roster and the other will likely be out of the organization. Workman must be offered back to Detroit in the event the Cubs choose to cut him; Bruján is out of options and would have to clear waivers to be outrighted off the 40-man before heading to Iowa. It’s very much an either/or at this point. In any case, the choice between the two is becoming clear. Workman not only has more upside — he’s flashed it more recently. Bruján has had a decent enough exhibition campaign on both sides of the ball, but it’s been a minute since we’ve seen a shred of offensive upside from him. Especially given that he’s gotten actual run at the highest level in a way that Workman has not. If there’s a chance for Workman to further cement his status as the better option, it could come in Tokyo. With Matt Shaw’s status up in the air given his delayed start to the spring, there’s an outside shot the Rule 5 pick could nab a start (or two) in his stead. While Workman has shown his chops at the plate against legitimate arms in Arizona, doing so on a big stage against one of the most threatening staffs in baseball could leave the Cubs without a question regarding their final roster spot. View full article

The Cubs' young center fielder has impressed thus far in spring training, attracting his fair share of critics. Will he defy their expectations and become the team's next superstar? Image courtesy of Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune Pete Crow-Armstrong may never be the Chicago Cubs’ “best” player. But it probably doesn’t matter. In his time with the Cubs, there were two occasions in which Javier Báez led the team by various Wins Above Replacement metrics. But in the organization’s previous era, he hardly would’ve been labeled their best player given the more outright stability provided by some of his contemporaries from the championship and championship-adjacent seasons. I don’t know that Crow-Armstrong will ever reach even those heights on the stat sheet. He does, however, represent as integral a presence as Báez provided during his stay on the North Side. For eerily similar reasons. Because what Pete Crow-Armstrong can provide goes beyond the stat sheet. In the same way that it did with Javy. It’s a certain level of can’t-miss excitement that exists within a paradox of very in-your-face drawbacks. We’ve seen that in action this spring. He’s turned a steal of second into a run scored. Taking third on a wild pitch turned into another. A single to left resulted in a little league home run of its own. And when the speed isn’t on display, the power has been. Just last week, we saw a multi-homer game that included a grand slam. In what has been a wildly successful exhibition slate for the collective, it’s been PCA grabbing our attention rather forcefully. The spring numbers are reflective of that, too. Crow-Armstrong has slashed an absurd .520/.500/1.040/1.540 with a hefty .520 ISO. On the other side of that, of course, resides his 26.9 K% and 0.0 BB%. That’s not a misprint. Crow-Armstrong has not recorded a walk in 26 plate appearances. Which speaks to the fact that the wart(s) in his game are still there. While we saw him rein in the free-swinging ways for a short stint last August, it’s not something that we should expect to be permanent. Heck, it didn’t even make it to the end of the season. More contact? Sure. But the approach isn’t likely going to change too radically in a way that turns him into some kind of walk machine. It’s why we aren’t likely to see PCA atop the lineup anytime soon. But like we saw in Javy’s time with the organization, you can compensate plenty for hacking irresponsibly if you have the other components of your game in order. And you can make people forget about it altogether if you do things in a manner that keeps their eyeballs happy and their anxiety up just a touch. The Cubs aren’t an organization known for possessing head-turning talent. Not that those players grow on trees; it’s almost like they’re limited to a few organizations. Even the higher-quality Cub teams of the last decade have had fundamentally sound foundations with which to work, even with occasional charisma thrown in. But only Báez represented the type of talent that led other fanbases to tune into what was happening within a given situation involving the Cubs. There was obscene flair, wrought by instinct and a natural showmanship. It highlighted the things he did well and led us to ignore the things he didn’t. Pete Crow-Armstrong is an exceptional defender. He was tied as the league’s second-best position player by FRV (16) despite only appearing in 123 games. He’s an elite baserunner, borne not only out of the aforementioned instincts but by 99th percentile sprint speed. If the spring season is to be believed, there’s more power in there, too. The type of value a player like PCA can bring — assuming we get the breakout that appears legitimately on the cusp — is and is not quantifiable. We’ll look to some of the approach figures. The defensive analytics. But we’ll also recognize the ability shift a game by forcing a mistake on the bases or closing an inning with an incredible defensive play. Those less-quantifiable elements offer the type of presence that the team has not had since they sent Baéz to Queens. The Cubs have a solid roster, top to bottom. They have plenty of upper tier names on either side of the ball. They even have an Actually Elite™ player on their roster with Kyle Tucker’s addition. But Pete Crow-Armstrong is the guy who can turn a game around with one play, for better or worse. With plenty to get jazzed about with the season so close, it’s the potential explosion of a new volatile star on the North Side that stands above the rest. View full article

With Pete Crow-Armstrong locked into center field for the foreseeable future, the Cubs have a linchpin in the outfield. Do they have enough depth to cover for him on his days off? Image courtesy of © Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images Even with the addition of Kyle Tucker, the middle of the Chicago Cubs’ 2025 outfield trio has the potential to be the most thrilling component of a very solid roster. This is, of course, due to the second-half emergence of Pete Crow-Armstrong. Crow-Armstrong doesn’t just represent upper-90s percentile in speed, baserunning, and defense. He flashed offensive upside last year that could serve as an effective enough supplement to the elite parts of his game to make him one of the very best outfielders in the sport. That might seem like hyperbole. But the tools that are there are loud. If he can hit well enough, then he immediately becomes a must-watch player for a team that hasn’t really had one since Javier Báez. I’m not sure to what extent the Cubs’ 2025 fortunes rest on the shoulders of PCA. But I do know that his performance in the upcoming season could go a long way toward contention. CUBS CENTER FIELDERS AT A GLANCE Starter: Pete Crow-Armstrong Backup: Vidal Bruján (?) Depth: Jon Berti, Travis Jankowski Prospects: Kevin Alcántara Cubs fWAR Ranking Last Year: 9th (3.0) Cubs fWAR Projection This Year: 3.2 THE GOOD By fWAR (in a minuscule sample), only a dozen position players were better than Pete Crow-Armstrong last August. He accumulated a 1.4 figure during the month, slashing .314/.375/.558/.933. His strikeout rate came in at a season-low 14.3%, while his walk rate was his best in an individual month (8.2 percent). He ISO’d .244. The entire offensive performance culminated in a 154 wRC+. He fell back off in September, but that end-of-July-into-August stretch has compounded with a strong start to the spring (pre-hamstring tightness) to generate some really high expectations. We know the defense is elite. We know the baserunning is there, too, given the 99th percentile sprint speed. PCA can be a four-plus win player on the merits of those components alone. But if he can be even a sliver of the player he was at the tail-end of the summer, you’re looking at a special player manning the center of the outfield grass for the next several years on the North Side. THE BAD Of course, the caveat to all of that lies in the approach. In the article linked above, @Matthew Trueblood dove into PCA’s tendencies in September, when he’d regressed following that torrid August stretch. At the very least. there was still an all-fields approach that should serve him well moving forward. His (lack of) discipline, however, remains a source of concern. Among hitters with at least 400 plate appearances, PCA’s 59.2 Swing% was the fourth-highest of a group that includes 207 position players. His 43.5 Chase% was the seventh-highest. Neither his 15.8 Whiff% and 73.2 Contact% were in places in which you’d like to live. During August, he cut the chase down to 36.0 percent and bumped the contact up to nearly 80. It showed that with a more measured, patient approach, Crow-Armstrong can maximize his offensive production. The extent to which that comes to fruition, though, is very much a matter that falls under "to be determined". THE BOTTOM LINE There is a fairly strong expectation of growth from Pete Crow-Armstrong in 2025. We know what he can do with the glove, and we know what his speed looks like on the bases. There’s tremendous value there. Even if the bat is a zero, he can be a strong contributor on a contending team. But now that we’ve seen what he can do with a more refined approach, expectations should shift. Improving the plate discipline is an imperative for the young outfielder. The good news attached to that is that PCA seems very much like the type of cerebral player capable of implementing such improvement over a longer stretch. If that happens, the takeoff will be real. View full article

The Cubs are betting big on their top prospect to handle third base with aplomb in 2025. Do they have any safety valves in case that bet goes sideways? Image courtesy of © Allan Henry-Imagn Images Leading up to and well into the 2024 season, I spilled a lot of ink parsing through the Chicago Cubs’ situation at the hot corner. While a fan of the idea of giving Christopher Morel extended ride at the spot given his offensive profile, that experiment quickly wore itself out. The glove was bad. The arm, despite its impressive strength, was erratic. While the Cubs were able to stomach such eccentricity within someone like Javier Báez, the defensive upside that their former middle infielder possessed was nowhere to be found. Worse yet, Nick Madrigal’s impressive defensive debut from 2023 didn’t carry over to the new year (in those rare moments he was healthy). In total, the team rotated six different players for more than two games at the position. David Bote was average defensively; Miles Mastrobuoni was slightly above. The team acquired Isaac Paredes in exchange for Morel, aiming to get a little more stability on defense while still maintaining some quality on the other side of the ball. We know how that turned out. His offensive profile wasn’t super suited for Wrigley Field and the Cubs were able to flip him as part of the package for Kyle Tucker. Of course, that leaves the Cubs in a familiar position of uncertainty regarding an outfield corner. CUBS THIRD BASEMEN AT A GLANCE Starter: Matt Shaw Backup: Jon Berti Depth: Gage Workman, Justin Turner Prospects: Pedro Ramirez Cubs fWAR Ranking Last Year: 26th (0.0) Cubs fWAR Projection This Year: 2.9 THE GOOD The trade of Paredes and the failed pursuit of Alex Bregman leaves a spot open for Matt Shaw. Shaw represents one of the top offensive prospects in the sport, possessing a mix of approach, contact ability, and power that make him an extremely enticing player to watch. That profile also ignores his speed and instincts on the bases. He hit 21 homers and stole 31 bases between Double-A and Triple-A last season. He’s been prone to an adjustment period, but his skill set has allowed him to minimize that actual timeline and turn in quality production regardless of level. While we’re unsure how his defense will translate to being a full-time Major League third baseman — mostly due to his arm being the lowest-graded of his tools — but the opportunity here is a really exciting thought. The Cubs aren’t generally the team with the exciting young player who breaks out in a loud way. At least not since, like, 2015. But Shaw has a clear and legitimate opportunity to be that guy for them in 2025. THE BAD The trade of Paredes and the failed pursuit of Alex Bregman leaves a spot open for Matt Shaw. There isn’t a safety net here. Even beyond Bregman, a signing of someone like Josh Rojas or Yoán Moncada could have made some sense in order to provide one. And we don’t know to what extent the Cubs pursued such an avenue. Shaw struggling out of the gate isn’t a concern. At each level, the natural adjustment period ran its course and Shaw proved to be adept at handling the additional challenge. But should reaching the top level turn into something more prolonged, it’s unclear as to how the team will handle the position should he need to return to Iowa for a spell. The options beyond Shaw are fine defenders, but notably questionable on the offensive side. Rule 5 pick Gage Workman has had a stellar spring but has yet to appear in a regular season game above Double-A. Even if he sticks around, you’re looking at a much lower offensive ceiling than that of the team’s top prospect. Options like Jon Berti or Vidal Bruján or non-roster invite Nicky Lopez can handle the position defensively but have bats that linger around average to (far) below. It isn’t an outright concern just yet. We have no reason to think that Shaw won’t be able to hit in the way that he has each time he’s leveled up. But staring down the barrel of uncertainty if things need to go past him would represent a real challenge for this year’s group. THE BOTTOM LINE Even with those lingering negative thoughts at the back of one’s mind, the third base position has a chance to be a real exciting element of the 2025 Chicago Cubs. After hearing so much of the vaunted farm system over the last few years, opportunities are finally opening up for us to see the upper-tier prospects in action at the highest level. The Cubs haven’t necessarily been known to be aggressive in promoting, but Matt Shaw has shown enough to say that the gig is his until it isn’t. Ultimately, his defense will be immaterial. And while the projections don’t expect him to go off to the tune of Rookie of the Year candidacy, most of them have him falling in the 13-15 homer, 15-20 steal range. That would be enough to be a solid contributor, with the on-base stuff ideally following in the years to come. View full article

With Michael Busch entrenched at the cold corner, just how rosy are the first base projections for the Chicago Cubs in 2025? What a difference a year makes. The first base position on the North Side was extremely uncertain ahead of the 2024 season. The Chicago Cubs had gone plug-and-play in the two years following Anthony Rizzo’s deadline departure. The 2022 group was led by Alfonso Rivas’ 81 games at the spot, with a smattering of Frank Schwindel, P.J. Higgins, and Patrick Wisdom behind him. The succeeding team in ’23 wasn’t terribly improved. They saw a hodgepodge of Eric Hosmer, Trey Mancini, and (eventually, courtesy of injury) Cody Bellinger rotate through. In total, seven different players logged at least a dozen appearances at first base. There were some Pete Alonso rumors at one point, but the position itself lived almost entirely in the abstract given the excessive turnover and lack of notable prospects in the wake of Rizzo’s departure. Enter Michael Busch. A castoff of the Los Angeles Dodgers’ crowded farm system, Busch was a bat without a position during his days as part of their organization. The Cubs entrenched him at first base from the jump and the results were… actually quite good. His bat was uneven, but the approach matured as the season wore on. Perhaps more importantly (given the offensive pedigree already possessed), his defense improved as the season progressed. He ultimately finished as an above-average defender. Busch’s presence leaves no doubt as to the immediate future of the position. He’s under team control through 2027 and has added muscle in pursuit of additional power. Beyond him, however, things get a little bit murky. CUBS FIRST BASEMEN AT A GLANCE Starter: Michael Busch Backup: Justin Turner Depth: Jon Berti Prospects: Jonathon Long, Moises Ballesteros Cubs fWAR Ranking Last Year: 11th (2.2) Cubs fWAR Projection This Year: 2.0 THE GOOD There’s stability here now. That is perhaps the most important thing about Busch’s emergence in ’24. And while he was already a quality offensive prospect upon arrival, he showcased maturity as the year trudged on. After peaking in May, Busch’s K% dropped in each succeeding month. He closed the year with his lowest rate of the season, at 20.9 percent in September. With the exception of August (97), he was above average in each individual month by wRC+. Even with brutal batted ball luck (.212 BABIP) in September, he still posted a 117 figure and put down his highest ISO (.243) of the campaign. He capped the season on a high note, demonstrating enough growth as to not even make the position a conversation over the winter after so much uncertainty in the few previous years. The next steps for Busch are smaller components within the overall offensive profile. He posted upper-percentile chase, walk, and barrel rates. But he also sat in the 28th percentile in Whiff% and 46th in Hard-hit%. So, while he was making mostly good swing decisions, his contact quality was suboptimal. His swing also sat in the 24th percentile in bat speed. You can live with the whiffs not coming down if it means the added muscle will contribute to higher-end driving of the baseball. And if the Cubs can get that out of him, even at the expense of the overall contact rate, there’s likely another level to be reached here. THE BAD Prior to the Cubs’ signing Justin Turner, there were questions about the depth here. His addition, however, changes the calculus at the position. A career third baseman, Turner has largely been seen only at first in the last two years. His advanced approach — even with a sharp decline in his power output — should be a boon for several players on the roster, including Busch. He also provides a decent enough safety net should Busch face any sort of regression or injury. Given that, it’s difficult to pinpoint an exact weakness within the first base position. Longer-term, you’re obviously banking on Busch being a dude in the lineup even beyond 2027. Jonathon Long has a strong offensive profile, but likely isn’t the defender that Busch is. Moises Ballesteros may be forced over to first by virtue of his defensive trajectory as a catcher. Outside of those long-term, abstract possibilities, you’re looking at a position that finally has some certainty to it. THE BOTTOM LINE This is Michael Busch’s spot until it isn’t. While a hole at third base and a potential trade of Nico Hoerner prompted some brief discussion of his athleticism moving him elsewhere (even if on a temporary basis), the additional strength and consistent month-to-month improvement makes him a fascinating player to project as we creep closer to the 2025 season. View full article

The Cubs need more power production from their star shortstop in 2025. That's easier said than done, though, because there's no one adjustment he can make to tap back into the pop he's shown in the past. Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images There was a time in my life when I thought Dansby Swanson was a mystery—something to be solved. But I’ve grown up. Matured. Evolved. Now I realize that the Chicago Cubs’ shortstop is a sometimes-good, mostly underwhelming offensive performer who is propped up by the exceptionally steady defense he provides. It’s honestly nice to have that type of clarity. That does not, however, mean that there aren’t aspects of Swanson’s offensive game worth discussing. His power (and sometimes lack thereof) is a particularly interesting area of study as we prepare for the new season. The 2021 season represented the peak of Swanson’s power. He hit 27 home runs and logged a .201 isolated power (the only time he’s exceeded the .200 threshold). His Barrel rate, at 11.4%, was his highest over a full season, while his Hard Hit rate (42.7%) trailed only 2022 as his highest rate for a single season. He still finished as a slightly below-average performer (99 wRC+), because his walk rate was lower than you’d like (8.0%), his strikeout rate was higher than you’d like (25.6%), and he didn’t make as much contact as you’d like (72.6% of all swings). In 2022, Swanson experienced a sharp uptick in his average and on-base outputs. This was largely due to a .348 BABIP. The power dipped slightly, but from an overhead perspective, not much of what Swanson has done in those two years has changed since. His swing rates, chase rates, called strike rates, and so on have all remained within one or two percentage points of each other over the last four seasons. Aside from a 2022 outlier, the quality of contact rates haven’t changed much, either. What has changed, however, is the type of batted ball he's been hitting that hard. His launch angle fell sharply last year, in particular. With it, his ground-ball rate skyrocketed, so it makes sense that Swanson’s 16-homer, .148-ISO 2024 campaign was his worst power year in a full season since 2018. We’ve talked before about Swanson’s need to cling to a specific pitch type to generate sustained offensive success. My inclination in pondering the decline in power is that he is doing the opposite of that. But that may not be all. Before we get to pitch types, let’s talk about Swanson's overall swing rates in relation to the zone itself. To generate power, you’re looking middle-up, unless you’re an elite hitter who can generate power to other parts of the zone. Swanson is not one. He needs to live up. These zone profiles represent Swanson’s 2021, when his power was at its highest, against 2024: It’s not that Swanson is swinging less often. He’s just swinging in a more concentrated fashion, and it isn’t playing to his benefit. Below is Swanson’s Barrel rate per ball in play, with 2021 being represented on the left and 2024 on the right: In large part, Swanson was finding the barrel middle-middle (obviously) and up and away. With the condensed zone in which he operated last year, he’s just not finding the barrel. It’s almost as if he’s gotten too patient, in a very specific way, and it’s limiting his overall output more than a general decline in swing rate would. It’s important to note that the 2022 profile doesn’t look like the one from 2021. He worked more on the inner half. But he was still working the upper parts of both sides of the zone. That aspect, on either side, has faded in the two seasons during which he’s been with the Cubs. The launch angle, as a result, has come down, bottoming out at just 10.4° last season. Another factor impacting his ability to contribute is that he’s become pull-heavy. Since arriving in Chicago, Swanson has posted the two highest pull rate seasons in his career. He's hit fewer than 19% of his batted balls to the opposite field in each of his two seasons with the Cubs. It’s a dangerous proposition, when we know how bad Wrigley Field has been for right-handed hitters since he arrived. But given that he’s still swinging at outside pitches (albeit not elevated ones), you’d like to see him get the ball to the opposite field with more regularity to, perhaps, generate a bit more batted-ball luck. From a zone perspective, we should hope for a little more lift from Swanson in 2025, but for him to do that, he’s going to need to fall back in love with the fastballs. We’ve known for a while that Swanson’s best work comes against the hard stuff. It got him off to a strong start last year before things started to get jumbled in his approach. In his best quality-of-contact season (2022), fastballs were the pitch type at which he swung most (53.5%). Every year since 2018, save last season, his highest Barrel rate has come against heat. The same is true of his slugging average. The other two pitch categories have much more variation, but no sustained positive outcomes. He’s a player who needs to sit fastball. Unfortunately, that hasn’t been a viable proposition for him. Last year, Swanson swung at offspeed stuff more than any other pitch type. The year before, his first in Chicago, it was the same story, with a larger margin: It’s obviously not a new trend. But you'd like to see one of two things. Either the gap is narrower, like in 2021, or offspeed takes a backseat to the hard stuff. We got the first one in 2024. but we also got the highest chase rate of his career against offspeed offerings (60.9%), the highest ground-ball rate (64.3%), and a whiff rate that was 13 percentage points higher than it was against the fastball (37.1%)—which is, for the pitcher’s part, the purpose of throwing that type of pitch. And while Swanson did whiff and experience other negative results against offspeed pitches in his two best offensive seasons, he was still able to compensate with quality contact: As illustrated above, that has not been the case in his time with the Cubs. Instead, the gap between his success against fastballs and his success against other pitch types has only widened. This makes it seem like it’s more imperative for Swanson to focus on pitch type than on location. A blend of the two would, of course, be ideal. But if you had to hone in on one to draw out improvement in Swanson’s game, it would behoove him more to renew the focus on the hard stuff. I think it’s also important to consider the logistics of the swing itself. Swanson doesn’t have a particularly short or fast swing. It’s sort of middle-tier in length, and 45th-percentile in speed. Those are logistics we can investigate further, the more bat-tracking data we gather. But if the swing itself is an inhibitor of Swanson managing against high velocity, then the zone needs to be the focus. Either way, there are important considerations in the approach for Swanson to generate more power. That power doesn’t have to be exclusively in the form of home runs, but it sure as heck can’t include declining hard-hit rates and increased ground-ball numbers. Whatever the fix, perhaps a fresh environment—some changes in the hitting coaching group, better health, and a few new veteran voices around Swanson in the lineup—will help Swanson achieve it. One thing is for sure: since he's 31, this is a pivotal season. The Cubs need to see their long-term, star-level investment begin to return star-level performance, if only for a year or two. View full article

A couple of the hitters whose early struggles made life hard last spring are habitual slow starters. Does the team have ways to better survive early travails and put runs on the board from Day One this time? Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images The calendar has just barely flipped over to March, but we’ve long known the shape of the Chicago Cubs’ lineup to start 2025. The bench still needs to be sorted, sure. But assuming Matt Shaw latches onto the third base gig (and we have no reason to think otherwise at this point), the starting nine is crystal clear. At the same time, I’ve spent a good part of the early spring pondering what the results could look like early in the year with the apparent starting group. Last year, for example, we saw Ian Happ struggle mightily in March and April. His .216 average, .098 ISO, and 92 wRC+ last April were all his lowest in an individual month, ultimately pinning down his overall numbers by season’s end. Dansby Swanson followed up a 90 wRC+ in April with a meager 39 in May, before finally settling in during June. Notably, though, the early returns for both Happ and Swanson are fairly in line with what we should expect from each of them at that point in the year. While Happ’s career 104 wRC+ in March/April is indicative of an above-average player, it’s also his lowest figure in an individual month. In each of May and June, though, he’s at 121. His power output also takes a bit to get going. A .119 ISO for March/April comes in as the lowest, before spiking to .219 and .206 in the subsequent two months, respectively. In Happ’s case, there isn’t any clear thing to indicate why the slow start transpires. There’s as much variance in his swing rates and pitch-type tendencies in the first few months of the season as in the last few months. And it’s not as if he’s outright bad, with 2024 serving as something of an outlier on his spectrum of March/April production. It just takes a minute before his bat is fully ready in a given year. Even his more modest pace, though, presents a pretty strong contrast to his veteran counterpart in Swanson. While not quite the offensive caliber of even someone like Happ, Swanson has done his worst work in the season’s first month for virtually his entire career. His .235 average, .311 on-base percentage, .135 ISO, and 85 wRC+ before May 1 are all the lowest of any individual month. Last year saw his typical cold March/April spiral into a downright frigid May. We’ll get into some of the particulars regarding Swanson’s erratic tendencies (early and otherwise) at the plate in the coming days, but the main point is that the Cubs have a couple of regulars prone to quiet (or bad) stretches to start the year. You also have to factor in Matt Shaw, who has shown the ability to adjust when transitioning to a new level but will need some time to do so. That’s a third of the projected lineup that could slog a bit during the first month of the season, even if there's nothing materially wrong. That brings me to my central question: Do the Cubs have enough hot starters to balance out the cold ones? They were, after all, able to do it in 2024. Despite the slow starts from Happ, Swanson, and Nico Hoerner (not typically a slow starter, but he's coming off surgery ahead of 2025), the Cubs sat fourth in the National League standings and a half-game behind Milwaukee in the NL Central at the end of April. Their 149 runs over that first month and change were sixth-best in the NL. Interestingly, much of the balance came from multiple names no longer around. Mike Tauchman posted a 171 wRC+ across 92 March and April plate appearances, courtesy of higher-than-usual power numbers and a walk rate sitting a shade above 16%. Cody Bellinger’s walk and power numbers were also his best in an individual month, despite horrid batted-ball luck. While those two are no longer with the team, luckily, they were not the sole source of offense in the early going. Seiya Suzuki and Michael Busch were the Cubs’ second- and third-best hitters by wRC+ through April. Suzuki went for a 147 wRC+ across 68 plate appearances, while Busch sat at 130 after 108 trips to the plate. Both compensated for alarming strikeout rates (about 30%, on average) with good power and solid (though not outlandish) walk rates. While we don’t have enough data yet to say whether Busch is a characteristically hot or cold starter, we have a little more to back up Suzuki’s place in this. The numbers say we should be able to count on him for continued balance, in the event of slow starts from elsewhere in the lineup. His career 137 wRC+ in March and April trails only September for his highest individual month. He generally strikes out more early on, but also walks and hits for enough power to compensate. Entering the season as the team’s full-time designated hitter will, ideally, keep him healthy enough to continue to be that stabilizing force in the lineup. For his money, Busch closed 2024 on a high note. He wrapped September with his lowest strikeout rate (20.9%) and highest isolated power (.243) of any individual month. With added bulk and a strong start to the spring, he at least looks in line to repeat—or perhaps even build on—what was a great rookie season, and that should start right away. He already looks awfully locked in this spring. So there’s two—two batters, so far, to balance out expected slow starts from Happ, Swanson and (probably, whether by virtue of health slowing him down or holding him out altogether) Hoerner, plus the risk of an adjustment period for Shaw. Yes, that makes this the Kyle Tucker portion of the show. Tucker’s first month has historically been his worst month. The term is relative here, however. He’s posted a 122 wRC+ even in March and April; gone for an 11.8% walk rate; and slugged his way to a .206 ISO in the first month of the season throughout his career. That’s the difference with an elite hitter. His other months are better, because the bar is so high. In fact, he alone should help to compensate for the contributions Tauchman and Bellinger were able to make early last season, as long as he breaks out of his early spring funk before the season gets into gear. It helps to have that level of certainty, because the remainder of the group is somewhat uncertain. Can Pete Crow-Armstrong rein in the swing rates? Can Shaw make that huge leg kick work in the majors? Will Miguel Amaya’s second-half adjustments allow him to maintain such steady production? When you combine those questions with the typical (or expected) trends of certain hitters within the lineup, that balance becomes essential. And at this point, the Cubs appear to have it, given the Tucker acquisition. If you can get an affirmative on at least one of those three questions, the possibility of a torrid start becomes a bit more real. This wasn’t an intentional backdoor way of noting the importance of Tucker’s addition, but it kind of ended up being one. One of the consistent issues with the Cubs last year was not having that catalyst in the lineup when the group started to go cold. They needed someone to stay the course and mitigate the effects of any cold stretch. Tucker’s addition does exactly that, and his presence should be notable from the jump. Now, you’ve got Suzuki in a position to remain healthy. You’ve got Busch ready to build on his success. And you’ve got some youngsters who need to prove something early, in order to demonstrate their importance to the lineup. As frustrating as last year’s group was on the offensive side of the ball, the balance looks likely to be better this year. One can very easily imagine such balance not only serving the group well in April, but catapulting them to a wildly improved full season at the plate in 2025. View full article

We spent a great deal of time last season haggling over the 2024 Chicago Cubs’ defensive production at third base. Some of us dedicated valuable time to drumming up justifications, stressing patience, and ultimately forcing optimism regarding Christopher Morel’s future at the position. A fool’s errand, obviously. Image courtesy of Cody Scanlan/The Register Last year’s Cubs were the second-worst team in baseball in matters of defending the hot corner. Their -15 Outs Above Average was ahead of only the Cincinnati Reds. Christopher Morel himself accounted for an OAA of -11. His replacement, Isaac Paredes, also finished below the average threshold (-1). Even 2023 defensive darling Nick Madrigal took a step back in posting a -2 OAA in his abbreviated season. Virtually nothing went right at third base on that side of the ball. Despite that, the Cubs at least appeared to have found a middle-term solution for the spot. Paredes wasn’t without his flaws, but had proven to be a steady defender there over the course of his career. And then he was traded as part of the Kyle Tucker deal. A worthwhile move (obviously!), but one that also sent the Cubs back into the realm of uncertainty when it comes to the longer term outlook at that corner of the infield. Which is where Matt Shaw comes in. It’s a relatively objective thought to posit that the Cubs would have been in a better position with Alex Bregman in the fold. That would have given them a surefire answer at third base for the next handful of years (pending opt-outs), and even if the team had to trade Nico Hoerner to offset salary to make it work, Shaw is probably better suited for glove work at the keystone at this point in time. And if he’s not, they have other viable options coming down the pipeline (James Triantos, etc.). That’s not how things played out, of course. And the Cubs are now set to run out onto the field in 2025 with their top positional prospect as their starting third baseman. His bat will go a long way toward maintaining his role throughout the year, to the point where it may be the thing that makes or breaks him out of the gate. Because, ultimately, his defense is irrelevant. Diving into the numbers would be futile, given that only rudimentary figures are available for MiLB squads. On top of that, Shaw’s experience at third is extremely limited. He appeared there 42 times with Double-A Tennessee and another 22 with Iowa. Projecting his defensive output is just impossible at this point. What we can do, though, is lean on the profile in order to draw some conclusions. Especially up against someone like, say, Christopher Morel. MLB Pipeline noted the following about Shaw’s defensive makeup: Quickness & hands are kind of two prerequisites for playing the position. You can get by with even a mediocre arm. We saw Madrigal do it (even if it required six crow hops on each play). But that reaction time and the hands to make the play are the most essential components. Morel struggled because he didn’t have the hands. He tried to compensate with his cannon of a right arm. But without the foundation in the glove itself, it ended up moot. It’s that simple bit of information that we have about Shaw as a defender that should at least allow him to be an upgrade over the crew the team had manning the hot corner last year. Given that, I think it’s perfectly acceptable to believe that Matt Shaw’s defense at third base this year does not matter. With how much erraticism we saw from Morel this year, it would be a stretch to imagine something worse. By virtue of his stable glove alone, Shaw will be better. The Cubs are also more fortified elsewhere on the diamond. The remainder of their infield is somewhere between the realm of good (Michael Busch) to elite (Dansby Swanson and Nico Hoerner). They could have one of the best defensive outfields in the game. So even if Shaw’s adjustment to the top level includes some defensive growing pains, this team can live with it. The bat will be the emphasis. The bat should be the emphasis. Shaw may not be long for the position anyway, depending on Hoerner’s long-term future with the organization. I’ll be watching the defense with a keen eye because that’s my nature. But unlike last year, where I was living and dying with each play Morel had to make, the anxiety over Shaw taking over at third base isn't nearly as palpable. View full article

The Cubs had too many boxes on their offseason checklist to make upgrading the outfield defense a major priority—but they found a way to do that, anyway. Image courtesy of © Isaiah J. Downing-Imagn Images Late last week, MLB.com’s Mike Petriello published a piece in which he examined the most improved defenses among contenders (while also expounding on a pair of clubs who got worse on that side of the ball). I found it quite interesting that the Chicago Cubs were listed among the three teams with the most improved defenses. More specifically, I thought the rationale Petriello gave was worth exploring: We’ll talk plenty about the shape of the infield defense as the spring wears on and Matt Shaw gets closer to locking down the hot corner, but in the interim, the thoughts on the outfield are what struck me most. Petriello noted that a full season from Pete Crow-Armstrong before the above excerpt, with the idea of “addition by subtraction” serving as the basis for most of the rest of the discussion. So let’s dive a bit deeper into that. The Cubs figure to have a very regular outfield trio; Ian Happ, Crow-Armstrong, and Kyle Tucker are your three starters. Seiya Suzuki will rotate in on occasion, and the early assumption is that we’ll see Alexander Canario work as the team’s regular fourth outfielder. Perhaps Craig Counsell will work in a little Jon Berti, as well. That consistency in the starting lineup, though, is an important step toward solidifying the outfield defense. The Cubs deployed 10 different players on the grass last season: Happ, Crow-Armstrong, Suzuki, Canario, Bellinger, Tauchman, Wisdom, Kevin Alcántara, Miles Mastrobuoni, and Garrett Cooper. By Outs Above Average, they were exactly average in left field (0), well above in center (12), and below in right (-4). Obviously, some of the 10 players impacted those figures more than others, but the newfound stability of the outfield defense should be evident early on. Crow-Armstrong coming in as the full-time center fielder is a key component of this. He posted an OAA of 14 last year, with a 94% success rate against an 89% expected rate on batted balls in his direction. He was above average in each individual month in which he appeared, including notching 6 OAA in the season’s final month. We know that his value lies predominantly in his glove, and it’s almost impossible to overstate the significance of a full season of that. He only got about 65% of the playing time out there in 2024; that number seems bound to rise in 2025. Next to Crow-Armstrong, the most notable change in the defense is to his left. As Petriello notes, Bellinger was exactly average and Tauchman fell a touch below. Suzuki, though, was a problem across the 72 games in which he appeared in right field. He posted -3 OAA, and the eye test might’ve actually been worse. To add Kyle Tucker, who has never fallen below the average threshold (with the exception of a wonky 2023) solidifies the defense there. To not only remove Suzuki from the equation on a full-time basis, but replace him with an above-average defender, is a boon for the group. Interestingly, the biggest question mark of the three is likely Ian Happ, who has built up a reputation as a quality defender. Despite the Gold Glove reputation to which he’s attached, he finished as a below-average defender by OAA in 2024. Some of that was due to a brutal April that hampered his overall defensive production (-4 OAA). But he still had the odd month after Crow-Armstrong arrived where he was also worse than average. Moving to his left became particularly problematic. In that respect, one primarily has to wonder about the communication between Happ and Crow-Armstrong. Perhaps some time and adjustments were needed. For a defender the quality of Happ is to struggle moving in the direction of one of the game’s elite defenders speaks to some sort of communication issue. If that ends up solidified, then we should see a big bounce-back for Happ. And if we don’t, we might have to start wondering if his career-worst 2023 (-7 OAA) was a precursor. We’ll table that discussion for now, though. The unknown in all of this is Canario. We know he’s logged time at all three outfield spots, but he has a minimal sample at the top level to inform any evaluations. With the Cubs, he’s only appeared in each corner. But the expectation is that he’ll step in to spell Crow-Armstrong in center, too, should he make the roster. Given the depths to which we saw Suzuki’s glove sink, though, it’s difficult to imagine Canario being too much of a detriment as a once-or-twice-a-week guy. Last year’s Cubs were fine in the outfield. Especially late in the year. But the overall perception has entirely shifted with the new year. While we need to keep an eye on Happ, a full season of Crow-Armstrong; the addition of Tucker; and addition by the subtraction of Suzuki from the defensive equation could very well have this looking like one of the top outfield trios the league has to offer. View full article

He'll be a welcome veteran presence—even by the young guys at each infield corner, because neither of them should feel threatened by the Cubs' newest bat. Image courtesy of © Eakin Howard-Imagn Images With the Chicago Cubs bringing in Justin Turner on a one-year deal Tuesday, there will be an immediate reaction from certain circles that label him as “Matt Shaw insurance.” After all, this was a pivot after the team failed to sign Alex Bregman. Given that the newest member of the Boston Red Sox would have been just that for the Cubs (in a couple of different ways) their pivot should offer much the same kind of value, right? It’s a notion that isn’t entirely misguided, on the surface. If one hasn’t been tuned into Justin Turner’s career, then one is still likely to assume he’s a corner bat capable of manning third base as needed, while also serving as a supplementary piece at first base and in the designated hitter spot. But while it’s understandable to maintain that perception of Turner, it’s just hopelessly out of date. In his career, Turner has over 7,800 innings at third base to his name. He has roughly 850 on the other side of the infield, and a smattering of innings on the middle infield (including 49 perhaps somewhat notable frames at the keystone in 2023). Of the massive amount of time he’s manned the hot corner, only 90 of those innings have come in the last two seasons. Of the 850 at first base, 616 have come over that same span. Turner hasn’t turned in an above-average defensive season at third base since 2019. In his limited time at third, he’s fallen below the average line in each season since, regardless of your metric of choice. He’s been at least serviceable at first base, where each metric has lingered just around average (if not slightly above). Even if the glove proved capable, the arm is a virtual zero at this point. Since 2020, Statcast has Turner’s arm strength ranked 565th of 705 players. In 2024, specifically (albeit spending time primarily at a position that required fewer, easier throws), he ranked 269th out of 288 names. There simply isn’t anything to justify placing Turner at third base at this point in his career. Of course, we watched Christopher Morel play third for the majority of last season. By Outs Above Average, Cub third basemen ranked 29th in the league in the quality of their defense (-15). Only Cincinnati was worse. Craig Counsell will not use that as a justification to throw Turner out for extended stretches. That said, he'll probably be available to play the spot for parts of games when an injury happens or chaos reigns. He has experience, and minimizing the time he spends there should help to mitigate any negative factors that could be wrought by his poor performance at the position. Turner will serve as the primary backup to Michael Busch at first base. He’ll offer some protection against particularly tough left-handed pitchers. He’ll slot in as the team’s designated hitter whenever Seiya Suzuki finds himself in an outfield corner. And he’ll, on occasion, slide over to third base when the circumstances are exactly right. The opportunities for that latter scenario will be rare. Because Justin Turner is barely a third baseman anymore. He may not be at all. But regardless of how we want to define that descriptor in matters of the Cubs’ new veteran, it’s fairly clear that this move will have almost zero bearing on Shaw. It's a move built to boost the club's offense; their defense will have to figure itself out. View full article

When Yan Gomes's career unraveled in early 2024, it derailed the Cubs' catching situation for months. This time around, they're much better-positioned... right? Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images After a winter dedicated to creating more clarity and upgrading depth throughout the roster, there isn’t a whole lot for the Chicago Cubs to settle this spring. Matt Shaw and the third base spot notwithstanding, the positional side of the exhibition season will be about building up and staying healthy—at least as far as the starting lineup goes. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t a month without intriguing storylines for the lineup this side of Shaw, however. For the greatest degree of mystery about regular-season playing time, look behind the plate. In a broad sense, the Cubs’ catcher spot is settled. Signing Carson Kelly was designed to lower the risks associated with Miguel Amaya, but not to replace him. Jed Hoyer now hopes he has two credible backstops on his projected roster. The Logan O’Hoppe pursuit at last year’s trade deadline didn’t persist into the offseason. In the absence of higher-upside options on either the free agent or trade markets, Kelly was the best way to cobble together a modest timeshare situation, even if Amaya will still be the primary receiver. Keep an eye on the likes of Moises Ballesteros and Pablo Aliendo as the season progresses, but that’s for developmental purposes. Neither is set to challenge for a big-league role in camp, even if the former’s bat could put him on the cusp of earning some opportunities by the time the summer arrives. Early on, Amaya and Kelly will be the tandem behind the plate. The extent to which each one will “hold it down,” however, is a matter of some conjecture. Baseball Prospectus’s depth charts have Amaya occupying the spot half the time this year. Kelly’s at 45 percent. Ballesteros occupies the other 5%, likely in the instance of a late-season callup. Similarly, FanGraphs has Amaya at 50 and Kelly at 47, with an extra two thrown in the direction of Reese McGuire, who’s likely to get run as a third catcher in Iowa. Their last little bit of time was also saved for Ballesteros. Either way, an even division of labor looks likely. Will that be the case, though? Should it be? Plenty of factors will dictate what the split looks like. There are variables on both sides of the ball, too. Amaya might possess higher upside as a hitter. While his overall line (.232/.288/.357, 83 wRC+) doesn’t indicate a desirable offensive backstop, his second-half numbers do bode well. He went for a 113 wRC+ in the season’s second half, with a minuscule 11.4 K% and a strong .174 ISO. July and August were particularly kind to him, with wRC+ figures of 149 and 157, respectively. The changes to his approach are well-documented at this point, with Craig Counsell and company likely to spend the early part of the year figuring out how much of that is sustainable. Kelly’s 2024 wRC+ (99) essentially indicates a league-average hitter. He cut his strikeout rate by about nine points between 2023 and last year, driving up the power numbers from an .081 ISO two years ago to .135. While not overly impressive on its own, his 9.7% career walk rate is three points higher than Amaya’s. He’s had an uneven career as a hitter, but has shown the ability to give slightly above-average production out of the catcher position depending on the year. Amaya has two months of quality production to his name; Kelly has roughly two separate seasons of it over a much more extended period. Given the latter’s inconsistent production, however, there isn’t much separating the two at this moment. Even if Kelly has a wider sample of success than his catching counterpart. Amaya possesses more upside. It’s likely the bat that tips the scales in Amaya’s favor early. Defensively, Amaya is likely going to need to demonstrate more growth to stave off Kelly for the top spot on the depth chart. By the reckoning of Catching Defense Added (CDA), BP’s comprehensive catching metric, Kelly was the 21st-ranked catcher in the bigs last year (1.6). Amaya, meanwhile, sat 77th (-2.7). In more granular metrics, Kelly was just slightly below average in framing but above in both blocking and throwing. Amaya fell under the average threshold in framing and in throwing. As a blocker, though, Amaya succeeds. He trailed only Danny Jansen in Blocks Above Average, with 12 (via Baseball Savant). How much that compensates for his shortcomings in the other aspects of the position, of course, is a subject of both valid debate and much uncertainty. Savant also had him as the 10th-worst catcher in Framing Runs (-5), 14th-worst in Stealing Runs (-2), and with the fifth-worst pop time to second base. Kelly, on the other hand, was 20th in Framing Runs (1), 10th in Stealing Runs (3), and featured an above-average pop time. He's terrifically accurate, too. The defensive question isn’t one. Kelly is the superior defender. While Amaya still has time to showcase some development on that side of the ball, one does have to wonder how much that will factor into the distribution between the two—and when. It’s not a particularly enigmatic picture to examine. Amaya’s bat gets him early playing time. Kelly’s steadiness on both sides keeps him in the mix a few days a week. Over time, as Kelly becomes more familiar with the pitching staff, his run prevention forces the issue—but so does Amaya's continued offensive improvement. That, at least, is what the Cubs are hoping for. In the meantime, perhaps each guy will be paired up with specific pitchers. The catcher position is, undoubtedly, improved for 2025. But the way these two interact with each other, from a performance standpoint, could have a lot to say about where the position goes in the years beyond this one. View full article