RandallPnkFloyd

Image courtesy of © Thomas Shea-Imagn Images One of the more important developments for the 2025 Chicago Cubs was the evolution of Pete Crow-Armstrong from elite defender to all-around impact player. After finishing well into the below-average end of the wRC+ threshold in 2024 (86), Crow-Armstrong launched his offensive contribution up to a 112 mark in that respect, driven by a massive increase in power. The 2024 iteration of Crow-Armstrong posted 10 home runs and a .148 isolated slugging across 410 plate appearances, while this improved version went for 31 homers and a .234 ISO. He finished as the first Cubs player with 30 home runs and 30 steals in a season since Sammy Sosa did it twice in the early 1990s. That doesn't mean it was perfect, however. The concerns around Crow-Armstrong's plate discipline continued to manifest, and it's those very issues that played a significant role in a second half swoon from the team's star center fielder. While it wouldn't be out of line to discuss Crow-Armstrong's 2025 in the context of "breakout," it was very much a tale of two halves. Here's the breakdown from each side of the All-Star break for him last year: 1st Half: .265/.302/.544, 25 HR, 27 SB, 22.9 K%, 4.5 BB%, 131 wRC+ 2nd Half: .216/.262/.372, 6 HR, 8 SB, 25.6 K%, 4.5 BB%, 72 wRC+ There's some nuance to the splits in the sample (401 vs. 246 PA, respectively) and some bad luck on batted balls (.259 BABIP in the second half), but the difference in the numbers speak to some of the concerns that one might've had around Crow-Armstrong's profile from the jump. The strikeout rate climbed, but it wasn't an issue of being too aggressive in the way that one might also expect. His swing rate actually dropped in August to its lowest in an individual month (27.6 percent). Instead, it was a contact issue. Crow-Armstrong's chase rate went down, but his chase-and-miss rate reached its height in August (56.3 percent) while he struggled mightily against fastballs specifically by the end of the year. In September, his whiff rate against that pitch type (36.1 percent) was his highest in an individual month against any pitch from the three groups (fastball, breaking ball, off-speed). There are myriad factors that we could examine as to why there was such a drop-off in the second half; approach, mechanics, and burnout might've all played their role. Regardless of the root causes, it's clear that the second half decline in production is being taken into account heavily by projection systems. The following is how the various projection models figure Pete Crow-Armstrong for 2026: Steamer: .252/.301/.451, 20 HR, 27 SB, 23.5 K%, 5.5 BB%, 108 wRC+ ZiPS: .255/.304/.461, 25 HR, 32 SB, 24.6 K%, 5.4 BB%, 111 wRC+ ATC: .246/.296/.436, 23 HR, 33 SB, 24.2 K%, 5.6 BB%, 100 RC+ THE BAT X: .244/.296/.430, 22 HR, 35 SB, 24.9 K%, 5.8 BB%, 101 wRC+ OOPSY: .255/.306/.452, 25 HR, 37 SB, 24.1 K%, 5.7 BB%, 110 wRC+ The big takeaway is that it's mildly unusual to see projections so universal on an individual player. With the exception of slugging percentage where we see it a little more, there's very little variance across the board. Pretty much all of the systems like Crow-Armstrong to turn in a season quite similar to what we saw in 2025. But would that be satisfactory? If we wanted to be more pointed about it, what would a good season from Pete Crow-Armstrong actually look like? When he's "on," this is one of the most exciting players in the game. That manifests in terms of both power and speed offensively, with Crow-Armstrong possessing the ability to add to that excitement defensively. If we were going to quantify "good" for him, it likely starts with a continuation of those components on offense. Maintaining the counting stats (homers, steals) should allow him to keep that narrative alive. If we're going to classify it as a good year, though, the rate element will need to start to see some growth. That means that the approach needs to be reined in. It's very difficult for an aggressive hitter to tamp down on that aggression altogether, but if Crow-Armstrong can at least refine the approach to mitigate the strikeouts and create more balls-in-play opportunities, that can create a carryover into the other facets of his game. A few more walks or a few more infield hits should yield tremendous results for him as an individual and the collective lineup. There may not be much more than 30 homers in that bat, but there is certainly more upside to be realized in the swipes game if he's able to work his way on base with more consistency. And that's really what it comes down to for Pete Crow-Armstrong. We know what he adds on the defensive side; this is one of the best gloves in the sport regardless of position. For him, it's about getting that energy into something a bit more focused so that he can begin to drive his production up. The good news is that the projections anticipate at least a slight uptick in walks, which could be indicative of an increased focus on that element of his game. Expectations are a tricky quandary to solve, especially when someone as exciting as him does something like hit multiple home runs for Team USA in the World Baseball Classic. But if Crow-Armstrong can show a little more maturity at the plate while not sacrificing too much of what makes him so exciting to watch, it'll be hard to consider 2026 anything but a resounding success. View full article

Image courtesy of © Lily Smith/The Register / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images In the weeks leading up to this, we've explored the 11th- through 20th-ranked prospects in the Chicago Cubs system — as voted on by our North Side Baseball writers — with two installments of the down-the-list names and the top 10 being featured in individual profiles. That process continues today, with a look at our no. 5 prospect: corner infielder Jonathon Long. #9 - Jonathon Long (Iowa Cubs, Triple-A) After splitting time between two levels in 2024, Long saw his first taste of Triple-A the following season. He proved that he could hang around to the tune of a .305/.404/.479 batting line, a 19.1 percent strikeout rate against a 13.0 walk rate, and a 131 wRC+ across more than 600 plate appearances. Home runs were a fixture in his game, as he swatted 20 of them, including a multi-homer outing on July 4th of last year: It's an interesting profile, but one that needs just a bit more refinement before we start projecting a regular role for him at Wrigley Field. What To Like As evidenced by the above video, Long has plenty of pop in his game. His advanced approach allows him to create quality contact with a certain steadiness. As such, there's plenty to like in what Long turned in on the percentile side with the Iowa Cubs last year: Such an output is indicative of both the approach and the contact generated by it. For the most part, there's a blend of both. The quality in the approach begets the quality of contact. However, as we've seen at the top level with the likes of Seiya Suzuki, there's also a line where the patience goes too far. Nevertheless, Long demonstrated a healthy balance between the two more often than he hasn't. In addition to driving the ball off the approach, he's also able to avoid strikeouts and draw walks. Which is important, since we don't always see those aspects collaborate in such a way as they did with Long last season. There's a significant amount of offensive upside in that bat, with the ability to log time at either corner. What To Work On The knock on Long's game is in the elevation and the lack of work on the pull side. Sure, he popped 20 homers in 2025, but he also only ISO'd .173. Much of that is due to the fact that he put the ball on the ground to such a heavy extent. The rest of it comes a result of a virtually even split between pull and opposite field contact. Long pulled the ball at a 36.4 percent clip last year while going oppo 35.7 percent of the time. It speaks to the power upside that exists that Long was able to turn in such quality in his line even with each of those factors working against him. There's an obvious benefit in being able to drive the ball to all fields. But there's an even more obvious one in being able to elevate to the pull side, and Long's Pull AIR rate falling at the extreme-low-end of the spectrum is going to pin those numbers down quite a bit until he adjusts. Employing such a patient approach should at least make such an adjustment a matter of pitch or zone selection rather than anything mechanical, though. What's Next Despite the fact that the bat is just about where it needs to be, Long doesn't have an obvious path to playing time with the Cubs. He logged time at first base, third base, and left field last year, but only 15 of those appearances combined came at either of the latter two spots. Which means that, for all intents and purposes, Long is blocked by Michael Busch. Craig Counsell is also more likely to rotate out the designated hitter spot or something closer to a full-time look to Moisés Ballesteros than he'd be with long, given how right-handed the Cubs' starting group currently figures to be. That doesn't mean that Long is too far off, however. While it'd be a tough sell to have one of your higher upside offensive prospects riding pine for much of the week, there may be just enough versatility that he could crack the roster for at least a cup of coffee at some point in 2026, barring injury or a reconfiguration of the roster that creates left-handed spots elsewhere that could lead to an extended stay. Ultimately, though, the positional aspect of Long might make him too rigid a prospect to see for an extended run on the North Side anytime soon. The offensive profile is certainly intriguing enough, but the Cubs lack the opening or the logistics on the roster that will instead result in Long logging a heavy share of his time back in Iowa for the foreseeable future. Should one of the longer-term scenarios arise, however, that could leave just the sliver of roster space that Jonathon Long needs to make his big-league debut. View full article

Image courtesy of © Allan Henry-Imagn Images Having already examined the top 16 prospects in the Chicago Cubs' system as voted on by our North Side Baseball Writers we now turn to a player that has appeared on the cusp for a couple of years now: Kevin Alcántara. #4 - Kevin Alcántara (Iowa Cubs, Triple-A) Acquired in the deal that sent Anthony Rizzo to the New York Yankees, Alcántara's tools have remained as tantalizing as the prospect of him flashing said tools on the outfield grass at Wrigley. Loaded up on athleticism, it wouldn't be unreasonable to project him for an eventual 20 homer, 20 steal season at some point in the big leagues. As it is, Alcántara remains intriguing but heavily flawed. His .266/.349/.470 line was a bit of a decrease across the board, though he did remain an above average hitter at a 110 wRC+. The concerning element was in the strikeout game, where his rate approached 30 percent (29.8) against an 11.2 percent walk rate. He did get an even dozen plate appearances at the top level, where he contributed four hits but where the punchouts followed him as well (33.3 percent). Ultimately, we don't know what the immediate or long-term outlook looks like for Alcántara as part of the Cubs organization. In the interim, though, we know where he looks the part and where he still needs to grow if he's to be a factor in either timeline. What To Like The athleticism highlights what we like about Alcántara. He's capable of driving the ball in those instances where he does make contact; while his average and on-base percentage each fell between 2024 and 2025, he did bump the isolated power from .177 to .203 between the two seasons in Iowa. A 10.9 percent barrel rate (88th percentile) and 46.4 percent hard hit rate (81st percentile) are further indicative of the type of damage Alcántara can create when he puts the bat on the baseball. One imagines there's more than 17 homers (his current career mark) in the tank with more consistent contact. There's a baserunning component to Alcántara's game that drives the intrigue just that much more. FanGraphs has his speed graded a 60, indicating above average. While he's only totaled 17 steals between two years (213 games) in Iowa, the possibility exists that there is more upside to be found there with a more sustained on base presence. Alcántara also offers a steady glove and strong arm from any of the three outfield spots. Most of his work in Triple-A has come in center and right, with right field being a particularly intriguing position for him based on the arm. What To Work On This is where things get a bit dicey for Kevin Alcántara. It's not so much that he's an overaggressive swinger. Instead, there's a compounding of a long swing and some issues with pitch recognition that are pinning down his overall production. Alcántara's swing rate in Iowa last year was 44.2 percent. That's not out of the ordinary. Even a 29.2 percent chase rate might not be unreasonable for an organization that sends Pete Crow-Armstrong to the plate on an everyday basis. However, the contact rates themselves represent something much more concerning: Everything in Alcántara's percentile distribution is screaming about his approach. He's a bit too patient inside the zone, which exacerbates the problem when he chooses to chase. As a result, he doesn't make nearly enough contact to put the tools to work. It's a visibly comprehensive issue. Alcántara's poor pitch recognition combines with a long swing that leaves him unable to compensate. He finds the walks and the hard contact, sure. But there's no sustainability in anything he's doing. It's difficult to suggest any kind of mechanical changes could be on the horizon given such positive outcomes when he does make contact. Anything that Alcántara needs to fix begins with the mental work at the plate. The sooner he can start to dial in the eye, the sooner he becomes a viable piece at the major-league level. What's Next A combination of Alcántara's strikeout woes and a glut of right-handed bats on the current Cubs roster are likely to work in unison to send him back to Iowa to start 2026. Even we were to strip him of the former, the outfield configuration doesn't leave much space for him to latch onto a spot. Ian Happ has left field on lock. Crow-Armstrong is the everyday guy in center. Seiya Suzuki figures to resume his old post bag in right field. Even if Suzuki were to factor into the designated hitter role on a consistent basis, it's likely the Cubs want Alcántara getting everyday work rather than sitting as a reserve outfielder. Beyond 2026, however, it stands to reason that we'll see him holding down an outfield corner. Happ & Suzuki are each free agents. Considering the tools, if the Cubs get close to seeing what they want from Alcántara, he could very well get a crack at an everyday gig ahead of the 2027 campaign (assuming we have one). View full article

Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images With the spring exhibition season underway, there isn't a ton for the Chicago Cubs to figure out—at least when it comes to their regulars. Their lineup is largely set and, with the exception of the Alex Bregman signing, really has been all winter. Instead, the positional focus this spring is on who will round out the positional half of the roster from the bench. We know that Matt Shaw will assume a utility role on the infield and get occasional outfield work. We also know that Miguel Amaya will serve as the de facto no. 2 behind the plate (though it's likely to be a relatively even timeshare with Carson Kelly). If we're to assume Tyler Austin gets the third bench spot as a right-handed complement for Michael Busch at first base and occasional designated hitter, that leaves just one spot. We know that spot will go to an outfielder. Which outfielder, however, is arguably camp's most active question. It's not just that the Cubs have a set outfield. They have a trio of which each figures to log heavy playing time (barring injury). At present, FanGraphs projects Ian Happ for 93 percent of the time in left field, Pete Crow-Armstrong for 92 percent of it in center, and Seiya Suzuki in right field 76 percent of the time. That workload further supports the idea of the fourth spot going to someone from the outfield mix, which means you're looking at four names for one opening. Kevin Alcántara and Justin Dean are the options currently on the Cubs' 40-man roster. They're joined by non-roster invitees Dylan Carlson and Chas McCormick. On Monday, the Cubs added Michael Conforto to that latter group. The foursome enter the picture at very different stages of their respective careers, the nuance of which could inform the choice that Craig Counsell and company make about who resides on the roster by the end of March. The following is what each produced at the level at which they spent the most time in 2025: Kevin Alcántara (Iowa Cubs): 430 PA, .266/.349/.470, 29.8 K%, 11.2 BB%, 110 wRC+ Chas McCormick (Astros): 116 PA, .210/.279/.290, 26.7 K%, 7.8 BB%, 62 wRC+ Dylan Carlson (Orioles): 241 PA, .203/.278/.336, 22.4 K%, 8.7 BB%, 74 wRC+ Michael Conforto (Dodgers): 486 PA, .199/.305/.333, 24.9 K%, 11.5 BB%, 83 wRC+ Justin Dean (Oklahoma City Comets): 347 PA, .289/.378/.431, 23.6 K%, 11.2 BB%, 110 wRC+ It's not a particularly inspiring group. But they all have at least a history of upside. Even Dean, a late bloomer who wasn't even a high draft pick when he entered pro ball years ago, has defensive value and put up good enough numbers in Triple-A to earn a place with the eventual champion Dodgers during October. Alcántara's case is a little bit different than the others. In a perfect world, his best days are ahead of him. He's done solid work in the minors and is capable of holding down all three spots, but his strikeout rate remains concerning. Meanwhile, McCormick missed a good chunk of last season with an oblique injury and is two years removed from a 22-homer, 19-steal season with Houston. Carlson has never quite lived up to his billing as a prospect, with health issues of his own playing their part since a third-place finish in the Rookie of the Year voting back in 2021. Conforto has his own spotty history but a longer track record, with his approach remaining a steady component of an otherwise deteriorating offensive skill set. Before we can determine which outfielder may best serve the Cubs' needs off the bench, though, it's important to determine exactly what profile they may be looking for. The starting outfield features a nice mix of skill sets. Happ brings a switch-hitting, on-base-driven approach. Crow-Armstrong offers significant power and speed from the left side of the plate, if the contact can come through enough for each to be maximized. Suzuki blends patience with power as a right-handed hitter. However, it's also not so much a need to supplement the outfield group itself as it is to supplement the rest of the lineup. The Cubs are a righty-heavy group. They have Suzuki, Bregman, Dansby Swanson, Nico Hoerner, and both Kelly and Amaya. Moisés Ballesteros could balance things somewhat if he wins the first crack at the DH gig, but the possibility exists that he spends at least a little bit of time in Iowa to start the year. That means Crow-Armstrong and Busch are the only lefties projected to get regular work at present. With one of Kelly or Amaya, Shaw, and Austin on the bench, it's a group thin on lefties—which automatically begins to point us in a particular direction. Interestingly, the one that feels the easiest to eliminate from the discussion is the one who performed at the highest level in 2025, albeit in the minor leagues. Alcántara presents decent power, 10-15 steal potential, and athleticism to hold down any of the three spots. At the same time, he'd worsen that rightward lean for the overall group. Besides, the Cubs would probably want to ensure that he's playing as close to an everyday capacity as possible. Unless the Cubs find themselves in a situation where Ballesteros isn't ready and the DH remains more in flux, the assumption should be for Alcántara to start the year back in Iowa until a consistent spot at which to play opens up. McCormick also feels unlikely to be a part of the Opening Day roster. His power vanished entirely last year, and his splits against lefties (137 wRC+) are considerably better than they are against pitchers of the same handedness (93 wRC+). Even as a steady fielder—30 Outs Above Average in his career at all three spots—the fit just isn't apparent. Dean is McCormick, without the pop McCormick once showed. That leaves us with Carlson and Conforto. Carlson, at least, offers a presence as a switch-hitter. He has prospect pedigree and a steady approach, the latter of which he was able to parlay into a strong strikeout-to-walk ratio and consistently squared-up contact. Then, you look at the splits. Against right-handed pitching, Carlson's career wRC+ is just 83. His career average (.217) is nearly 60 points lower than it is against lefties. The power is consistent on both sides, but the strikeouts and walks are also each slightly worse. If the purpose of a hitter capable of swinging lefty is to combat tougher righties or swing in as a designated hitter, Carlson's probably not your guy. That means that the Cubs could very well find themselves in position to rely upon Michael Conforto as their bench bat, to start the season. Conforto does have some things going for him. His chase rate (23.2 percent) was in the 82nd percentile, which begot an 84th percentile walk rate. However, his quality-of-contact metrics regressed in 2025. His barrel rate fell by about two percentage points, and his hard-hit rate did about the same. While that is an obvious decrease, though, it also doesn't justify a 30-point drop in batting average on balls in play, to .247. Despite his own checkered history on the health front, Conforto has shown offensive chops more recently than his counterparts in this discussion. His barrel rate in 2024 (11.8%) was in the 80th percentile, and his hard-hit rate was in the 77th (46.0%). If the Cubs think they can make the tweaks to get him back in that direction, then his being a left-handed bat should, automatically, give him the edge. At that point, though, the Cubs would have to account for the fact that he hasn't appeared in center field since 2019. With Conforto on the bench, you're looking at Suzuki or Shaw sliding over when Crow-Armstrong needs a day off. Regardless, one imagines that the team would prioritize the bat over the glove. In a lineup that leans so heavily to one side, that feels like the more immediate concern. Given what we're looking at with this group, Conforto is the leading candidate for the final bench spot. With the ability to option Dean and Alcántara to Iowa, the team can afford to let them wait in the minors. View full article

Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images The Chicago Cubs enter 2026 as a team that looks largely the same offensively. Some dynamics will shift, of course. Alex Bregman is replacing both Matt Shaw and Kyle Tucker, in two different ways. Moisés Ballesteros is likely to get the first shot as the team's designated hitter, and the platoon partner for both Ballesteros and first baseman Michael Busch is newcomer Tyler Austin. On a team with so little turnover, certain adjustments are going to need to be made on an individual level in order for this offense to ascend. What those adjustments look like, however, differs from hitter to hitter. Let's take a look at what the team's presumed starters at each position (sans Ballesteros, given uncertainty around his role) need to tweak ahead of the upcoming season. Carson Kelly: Sustain the Approach Few hitters were better than Carson Kelly last April, regardless of position. Kelly slashed .360/.507/.840, for a 257 wRC+. It was the kind of month that props up your numbers for the entire year. Unfortunately, things didn't really carry over into the subsequent months for the Cubs' starting catcher. Some of that is natural regression, but a lot of it is due to him losing his approach. Kelly's only two above-average months were April & July. It's not a coincidence that those two months featured his lowest chase rates (very impressive 17% marks). That rate increased steadily over the past two months of the year. The result? His walk rate was nearly cut in half and his strikeout rate spiked by nearly eight percentage points. Plate discipline erodes when players don't get enough time off, and Kelly took on a heavy workload after injuries sidelined Miguel Amaya. Regardless of how much he plays, though, Kelly needs to exercise more consistent patience. Michael Busch: Improve Bat Speed Busch had an excellent 2025. He continued to improve his approach and drove his power figure up, to the tune of 34 home runs and a .261 ISO that was nearly 70 points above what he posted as a rookie. However, Busch's swing is extraordinarily slow for a slugger. His 69.6 MPH average swing speed was ahead of only Nico Hoerner among Cubs hitters last season. He generates tons of squared-up contact (28.9 percent of swings), but didn't gain much traction in the blasts department, which links the ideal contact with a fast swing. While Busch's home run and ISO totals each landed in the top 15, his blast rate was just 76th in the league. There's a nearly unavoidable tradeoff between swing speed and barrel accuracy, and Busch favored the former last year, with stellar results. Still, he might need to rebalance those two objectives to have a similarly strong 2026. Nico Hoerner: Zone Awareness We recently profiled Hoerner, who saw a slight bump in his power output in the second half of 2025 after it was absent for most of the year. There's a bit of evidence that it was due to increased action on fastballs inside the strike zone, but there is more that indicates it was due to where in the zone Hoerner was swinging. Much of his power comes on the inner third of the plate. Even with the slowest swing on the current roster, it stands to reason that a fusion of the two ideas—wherein Hoerner concentrates on fastballs within that preferred zone—could yield more consistent power outcomes. They'd still be modest, but it would be a way for Hoerner to take a step forward. It might cost him plate coverage, though, so he'd need to be slightly more disciplined in order to make that shift in focus work. Dansby Swanson: Swap Power for Contact Swanson's .173 ISO in 2025 was his best since 2021. Despite just average bat speed, he finished in the 80th percentile in hard-hit rate (47.8%) and the 74th percentile in barrel rate (11.7%). A concentration on fastballs helped, as his 55.6% swing rate against them was not only his highest against any pitch group but the highest rate of his career. The issue is that he's not generating enough contact to make the power outcomes as impactful. His contact rate was down about two percentage points from the two previous years, and he whiffed at a higher frequency than at any point in his career (14.3% of all pitches seen). His contact rate on pitches outside the zone dropped by roughly 12 percentage points, too, which is indicative of a player selling out on a pitch type (fastballs) even if not totally selling out for power itself. That loss of out-of-zone contact is also part of the aging curve for most hitters, so he's unlikely to recover it. He'll have to be more focused on contact just to sustain his current level. There's still value in the bat, but more contact would help it to be realized with more regularity—even if it has to come at the expense of taking the occasional fastball. Alex Bregman: Sustain This is more of an incomplete case, as we haven't seen Alex Bregman suit up for the Cubs yet. In theory, Bregman's profile should play better at Wrigley Field than most right-handed hitters. He's not a pure pull-side guy, leaning on left-center for his power more than yanking it down the line like Isaac Paredes. Everything else about his profile screams success; he has a relentless approach with upper-tier contact skills. Given that he's not a barrel merchant, though, continuing to make the type of contact that he does will be crucial for him to avoid the pitfalls that ruined the Chicago stays of guys like Paredes and Trey Mancini. Ian Happ: Increased Aggression Much of Happ's value lies in his plate discipline, so it'd be foolhardy to suggest he overhaul his approach. Part of the nature of working deep counts, though, is that you miss out on fastballs earlier in at-bats and are prone to an above-average strikeout rate. He obviously compensates well with his walk rate, but there's something to be said for Happ trying to be more aggressive in certain instances. In five of the last six seasons, Happ's biggest slugging output came on fastballs. Generally, however, it's that pitch type against which he swings least often (something that is even more true inside the zone). While he shouldn't abandon his sense of the zone, being more selectively aggressive could lead to a more impactful presence wherever he lands in the 2026 lineup. Pete Crow-Armstrong: Make More Contact The upside—the superstar potential—for Crow-Armstrong is obvious. The issue is that neither his speed nor his power can show up if he's forever chasing, and missing. He swung at roughly the same rate of pitches in 2025 as the year before, with a nice bump in the in-zone rate against the chase rate. He also made significantly less contact when he did chase, though. It might be unreasonable to expect him to tamp down the swing rate itself, but more contact could beget more positive results, especially given that speed. He wouldn't be the first aggressive hitter to make that profile work, but it's going to require more competence in generating contact than we've seen to date. Of course, the surest path to more contact is better swing decisions. Seiya Suzuki: Work the Edges Seiya Suzuki is one of the game's most patient hitters, but his approach is highly specific—and the problematic aspects of his patience show up in one particular segment of the hitting zone. As such, Suzuki's situation isn't all that similar to Happ, who could stand to swing with more regularity in general. Suzuki needs to figure out how, on occasion, to anticipate and attack even well-executed pitches on the edges of the zone. His -21 run value on pitches on the shadow of the zone (within a ball's diameter of the edge of the zone, in either direction) was better than only Swanson's -25, among last year's Cubs. Only Busch and Tucker featured a better cumulative run value than Suzuki's 18, which speaks to the opportunities missed by being so precise with the approach. It's not about opening up the zone fully, but taking advantage of better preparation by not giving in to pitchers who locate well. View full article

Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images As observers of the Chicago Cubs, we've all become accustomed to their standard process in building a bullpen. It's the waiver claims, the projects, and the last-chance veterans. Somehow, they've made it work. In the face of that success, though, Jed Hoyer and Carter Hawkins chose to revamp the approach this winter in creating more early certainty that (they hope) will yield some long-term stability. The Cubs' leaders in relief innings in 2025 were Brad Keller, Caleb Thielbar, and Drew Pomeranz. Chris Flexen was a bit further down the list, in sixth. Keller was a minor-league signing who'd last flashed upside nearly seven years prior. Thielbar was a 37-year-old coming off the worst year of his career with the only team for which he'd ever pitched. Pomeranz was in camp with Seattle on a minor-league deal prior to being acquired by the Cubs that April. Flexen was on a non-guaranteed pact of his own. That's four of the top-six arms in terms of volume bearing very little margin for error on a career-level scope. A last chance, if you will. Let's work back farther in the chronology. In 2024, the Cubs had the likes of Tyson Miller, Héctor Neris, Mark Leiter Jr. and Jorge López logging a good chunk of innings in relief. Miller had thrown for three teams the year prior, Neris went unsigned deep into the offseason due to some wildly concerning peripherals, Leiter was an active reclamation project for the team, and Lopez was a very public castoff from the New York Mets. Even the year prior, the Cubs were led in relief innings by waiver claim Julian Merryweather, Leiter on his second minor-league deal, and free-agent signee Michael Fulmer who was playing on a cheap one-year pact. It obviously doesn't account for all of said innings, but it speaks to what we've come to understand as a part of Jed Hoyer's process. Not that the results illustrate reason to be critical of such process. The Cubs ranked 11th in bullpen ERA in 2025 (3.78), 12th in 2024 (3.81), and 13th in 2023 (3.85). If anything, they've managed to improve the process every so slightly over the past handful of years. Results notwithstanding, though, the Cubs, simply, have not been a team that likes to invest heavy finances into their bullpen. They prefer to work it on the cheap via the development of their own arms, a waiver claim of an arm with upside, or hope they can catch fire with a buy-low free agent either past his prime or aimlessly searching for the upside they flashed earlier in their career. Given that, the 2025-26 offseason has represented a sharp deviation from the team's modus operandi in matters of the relief corps. At the onset of the winter, the Cubs lost a number of names to free agency. Keller, Pomeranz, Taylor Rogers, Ryan Brasier, and Aaron Civale were all among those who departed this offseason after logging time in relief for the 2025 Cubs. They also traded Andrew Kittredge back to Baltimore before things even really got moving. Ryan Pressly was gone before the season was. They did, however, re-sign Thielbar. Which means that, of the team's top 15 arms in terms of relief volume, only six remain in the organization: Thielbar, Daniel Palencia, Porter Hodge, Colin Rea, and Jordan Wicks. Only three of those are even likely to be guaranteed work (Thielbar, Palencia, and Rea). In replacing such volume, the team sought a new approach. The waiver claims and collection of minor-league signings are still there. But it may be difficult for them to log too many innings with the likes of Thielbar, Hoby Milner, Phil Maton, Jacob Webb, and Hunter Harvey in the mix. This means that five of the team's (likely) eight relief pitchers are not only established big league arms, but still working to enough effect to be on guaranteed contracts. Maton is coming off the best year of his career. Thielbar and Milner are extremely efficient against hitters of the same handedness. Although limited by injury, Harvey didn't allow a run across 12 appearances last year. Even Webb threw to a 3.00 ERA in 55 appearances. That's a robust group of arms that each feature a track record of sustained success. Sure, there might be a niche quality to some of them (Milner, most notably), but this group takes on an entirely different shape than previous bullpen iterations on the North Side of Chicago. Now, instead of requiring more inexperienced or erratic arms to shoulder innings loads, you're able to put them in more favorable spots and deploy them as supplemental pieces to the puzzle. It's not necessarily about getting a group that favors one result more than the other. Jed Hoyer didn't drive up the strikeout rates or the groundballs. He limited variance. That's the key here. Perhaps even more notably, the Cubs have built this group with an eye on 2027, too. Webb has a club option for the following year. Maton has a second year on his deal. Harvey and Thielbar each have mutual options, which stand as good a chance at being non-fiction entities as any other mutual option in the sport. Let's not overlook Shelby Miller in all of this, who was signed with the express purpose of being part of the year-after's group. Rather than waiting for the bullpen picture to take shape, Hoyer and Hawkins have been much more explicit in shaping it themselves. And while the multi-year factor may be significant, it's ultimately that decrease in variance that rings as the true victory for how the relief corps has been assembled this winter. In a division with a team like the Milwaukee Brewers, you want to force a degree of certainty on your opponents. Rather than let the natural happenings of a game unfold, a bullpen comprised of established guys helps to generate some stability and clearer outcomes, rather than letting a level of control escape your grasp. It won't all work, and the Ryan Rolisons and Trent Thorntons of the world may very well have their day. But the direction is encouraging for a team that hasn't sought to establish certainty in the bullpen this early in a calendar year in quite some time. View full article

Image courtesy of © David Banks-Imagn Images With spring training games mere days away, the 2026 season is officially underway for the Chicago Cubs. Last year's group carried plenty of intrigue with Kyle Tucker in the mix and the emergence of Pete Crow-Armstrong among the storylines, but it was always a team that felt incomplete. This winter, however, Jed Hoyer and company took measures to ensure that the 2026 roster would look a bit more robust than its immediate predecessor. It wasn't a perfect offseason, of course; it still feels like one or two more moves could have really solidified things from the jump. Nevertheless, it's a roster whose prospects in the upcoming season offer something a little more encouraging than what came before it. Cubs' Offseason Free Agent Signings RHP Phil Maton (two-year, $14.5 million) LHP Hoby Milner (one-year, $3.75 million) LHP Caleb Thielbar (one-year, $4.5 million) 1B/OF Tyler Austin (one-year, $1.25 million) RHP Jacob Webb (one-year, $1.5 million with 2027 club option) RHP Hunter Harvey (one-year, $6 million with 2027 mutual option) 3B Alex Bregman (five-year, $175 million) RHP Shelby Miller (two-year, $2.25 million) There was a certain onus on the front office to be extremely active this winter. For a while, though, much of the action took place almost exclusively in relief. Hoyer and general manager Carter Hawkins were tasked with replenishing a pitching staff that lost Brad Keller, Taylor Rogers, Aaron Civale, Michael Soroka, Drew Pomeranz, and Ryan Brasier to free agency and traded Andrew Kittredge back to Baltimore early this winter. Rather than undergo the more typical process of building the relief corps out of reclamation types, the focus was on veteran arms. Each of Maton, Milner, Webb, and Harvey bring a veteran dynamic from both sides of the mound while Thielbar continues to be a reliable presence set forth by a strong showing with the Cubs in 2025. Miller's deal, however, puts an eye on 2027 considering he's set to miss the upcoming season while he recovers from Tommy John surgery. This updated collection of relief arms comes in addition to the typical smattering of minor-league deals and waiver claims. This talk of relievers buries the lede, however. The most impactful move of the winter was the team's signing of Alex Bregman to a five-year contract. A team that lost Kyle Tucker in free agency — and never really had any ambition of retaining his services for the long term — needed to produce impact offense from somewhere. In Bregman, they get a gap-to-gap hitter who doesn't strike out. To say nothing of the veteran presence he is reported to add to any clubhouse environment. He was one of only two major-league signings the team made to fortify their lineup this winter, as Tyler Austin returns from a lengthy stint in Japan to serve as a right-handed compliment to Michael Busch and, perhaps, occasional designated hitter. While not true free agents, it also seems worth noting here that the team re-signed Colin Rea to a one-year deal with a club option for 2027 while Shota Imanaga returned on the qualifying offer after both sides declined their respective 2026 options. Cubs' Offseason Trades Acquired cash from the Orioles for RHP Andrew Kittredge Acquired RHP Edward Cabrera from the Marlins for OF Owen Caissie, SS Cristian Hernandez, and IF Edgardo De Leon As busy as things might've been on the free agent front, the trade circuit had nary a whisper as to the team's intentions this winter. The Kittredge move happened early, as the team wasn't inclined to pay the $9 million owed to him for 2026. In Cabrera, however, the Cubs made as impactful a move as they could have hoped for. Long-rumored to have interest in a starting pitcher with frontline stuff, the Cubs brought in Cabrera to sit toward the front of the team's rotation. They lost some of their medium-term stability in doing so by trading Caissie (considering the impending free agent status of each of both Ian Happ and Seiya Suzuki), but acquired exactly the profile for which they'd been searching for at least a couple of years. Cubs' Offseason Grade Similar to the 2024-2025 offseason, the Cubs did not have a lot of questions on their roster in need of answers. Save Tucker, much of last year's starting lineup remained intact, while the rotation carried over plenty of the volume from 2025 into the winter, especially once each of Rea and Imanaga were retained in their respective ways. Nevertheless, the Cubs remained a team starved for impact. They needed some on offense to replace Tucker, and perhaps beyond. They lacked the sort of dynamic presence in their rotation outside of Cade Horton. While there's an argument to be made that they could have gone further (especially on the offensive side), the fact that they were finally willing to open the payroll to an addition like Bregman and invest in an arm like Cabrera — in addition to the dramatic shift in process on the bullpen front — signals a shift in the somewhat stagnant modus operandi we've seen from the organization over the last few years. A B+ feels more than earned. Verdict: B+ View full article

Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images No starting pitcher has thrown more innings for the Chicago Cubs over the last three years than Jameson Taillon. In fact, his 445. 1/3 innings since 2023 lead the group by a healthy margin. The gap is due to a combination of injury and turnover, and while those mitigating forces constraining others' workloads is not ideal on its own, that it's led to such a high volume of work from Taillon also presents its share of issues. In general, Taillon's numbers look fine over that stretch. Since 2023, he's pitched to a 3.96 ERA (4.39 FIP) and a solid 5.5% walk rate. You can work with that. But that he doesn't lead the team in fWAR (despite making 22 more starts than the closest arm) speaks to some of the struggles we've begun to see within that timeframe. The 2025 season is indicative of how Taillon's game has regressed in certain respects in the last three years: Note the quality of the walk rate and the fact that his actual ERA fairly reflects his expected one. Each of those will work. Taillon also navigates his way around hard contact effectively. The issues lie in the fact that his fastball velocity has fallen from the 44th percentile in 2023 (93.7 MPH) to just the 20th in 2025 (92.3 MPH). When you combine waning velocity with a minuscule groundball rate, you get a home run rate that has become problematic. Taillon's homer rate on fly balls in 2025 was 13.6%. It was the highest of his career and, no doubt, the byproduct of allowing 23.4% of batted balls against him to be pulled in the air. That his fastball reliance was at its highest since 2021 might also have something to do with it: Taillon's four-seam heater is a fine pitch. It had a run value of 3, while his no. 2 pitch in usage (the sweeper) finished at -9. The four-seamer, though, is responsible for Taillon's highest rate of barrels allowed (10.8%) and his highest rate of flyballs (41.9%). You don't want your highest-volume arm to have a fastball that hittable. The good news is that Taillon's role is projected to shift quite a bit in 2026. Cade Horton emerged as the viable frontline arm that his upside indicated. Justin Steele is nearing his return from an internal brace procedure. The team acquired Edward Cabrera from Miami to fortify the front end of the rotation. If we're assuming full health (a risky proposition), Taillon is, at best, the team's no. 4 starter. In a No. 4—or even a No. 5 depending on the fortunes of Matthew Boyd and Shota Imanaga—you're not looking for the 2018 version of Taillon, when he posted his best ERA (3.20), his best strikeout rate (22.8%), and his highest fWAR (3.9). You're just looking for someone to eat innings while minimizing traffic on the basepaths and, subsequently, not making life difficult for your bullpen. Even with the recent home run issues, Taillon is very much that guy. Over this three-year stretch in Chicago, Taillon has averaged 5.6 innings per start. In 2025, that number was 5.8 innings. His walk rate topped out at 6.3% in 2023, before dropping to 4.9% and 5.2% in the last two years, respectively. He's also coming off a year in which he posted a career-best strand rate (80.3%). So while the fly balls do represent an issue, it's not as if the bases are packed when it's happening. If anything, his splits indicate that with runners on or in scoring, the usage shifts in a manner that stifles quality contact and balls over the fence. Whether that skill is sustainable, even with tailored usage, is a fair question, but he managed it last year. We can outline two important components of Taillon and his role in 2026. The first is that the homers may continue to be an issue, based on usage and underlying trends with his fastball. The second is that such a trend is mitigated, thanks to the fact that he's sitting closer to the back of the rotation than ever. An innings eater free of traffic and a normal transition from starter to reliever within the context of a typical start? The Cubs can work with that. View full article

Image courtesy of © Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images Through no fault of his own, Miguel Amaya was one of the Cubs' most disappointing stories of 2025. In theory, he showed some very encouraging things. In reality, it's hard to deliver much of anything across 28 games and 103 plate appearances. Injuries derailed his campaign. Amaya hit the injured list with an oblique strain in late May. He took a long time to get back to the active roster and, upon his return, was shut down for the year when he viciously sprained his ankle in mid-August. Such disappointment stems not only from a lost year, but the expectations that were set forth as a result of the second half of the 2024 campaign. Two years ago, Amaya got off to a brutal start. His first-half wRC+ was 59, while he hit just .211 and reached base at a paltry .266 clip. Somewhat famously, Amaya revamped his approach and his mechanics almost entirely. That yielded immediate results: a 112 wRC+, a .271 average, and a .316 OBP after the All-Star break. His slug came along with everything else; his slugging average leapt from .288 in that first half to .444 in the second. There was a great deal more elevated contact, and the overall quality of the contact improved. Given the small sample, though, the question persisted about whether the improvements Amaya demonstrated were sustainable. It turns out, they were, or at least might have been. Amaya's first 100 plate appearances bore a .280/.313/.505 line and a 125 wRC+. The catcher who was once considered an heir apparent to Willson Contreras behind the plate at Wrigley finally looked ready to do so, though he benefited from being in a true timeshare with Carson Kelly even while he was in the lineup. Amaya and Kelly are set to resume their duties as the team's catching tandem. The latter, however, was able to take advantage of Amaya's absence. Kelly (115 wRC+) turned in his first above-average offensive season since 2021, posting the highest average of his career (.249) and his best OBP (.333) and slugging (.428) since that 2021 campaign. Such an output from a position where offense is a secondary concern could impact the timeshare early in 2026. The assumption is that the total body of work will earn Kelly an early edge in playing time, despite the fact that he didn't sustain the numbers posted in a torrid April. It's a sentiment shared by FanGraphs & Baseball Prospectus, as each have Kelly at 55 percent of the playing time behind the plate and Amaya for 40 percent. FanGraphs threw each another 4 percent of the reps as the designated hitter, while BP offered percent for Kelly and none for Amaya in that role. Either way, the bigger piece of the work goes to Kelly. That feels somewhat logical. Kelly's coming off a fine season, even if the splits reveal that it was, perhaps, a career year. Amaya is off a pair of long-term injuries. For a couple of reasons, though, that might not turn out to be the case. Kelly is a free agent at season's end. Amaya is not under team control until 2030. Unless you believe in Moisés Ballesteros behind the plate, the Cubs don't have a long-term plan at the spot beyond Amaya. Craig Counsell and his staff would love to see Amaya win more playing time than third parties project in 2026. The offensive difference between the two players seems marginal. If the second half of 2024 and early 2025 are to be believed, Amaya may offer more consistency in the quality of contact. Kelly, meanwhile, has a more patient approach at the plate that begets a more consistent on-base presence. Both bring something to the context of the Cubs' lineup. The opportunity for Amaya to gain some traction in establishing himself as a viable option down the line likely lies in the glove work. The first thing we tend to look at with catchers is their ability to frame. Immediately, there's an advantage there, in Amaya's direction: Amaya grades as a better overall framer than Kelly over the last three seasons. Obviously, the rate of called strikes goes down the farther a pitch gets from the zone. But there's also an interesting quality to Amaya's game that Kelly lacks: Kelly can grab a strike that is, technically, already a strike more effectively than Amaya can. Amaya, however, is more adept at grabbing a few extra strikes that fail to hit the zone. That's the essence of framing, in a broad sense. The new ABS system could have a bearing on this, but the understanding has been that ABS will help to make good framers better and bad framers worse. The Cubs have a pair of average framers, but if we're to believe in that sentiment on a spectrum, it could play to Amaya's advantage. It's an advantage that Amaya carries into blocking, where his Blocks Above Average over the last three years totals 11 to Kelly's seven. Where Amaya does start to cede some ground, however, is in controlling the run game. Kelly not only boasts faster pop times, but features a Caught Stealing Above Average of 13 in that span, to Amaya's -4. Ultimately, though, this leads to a trend similar to the offensive side, where each does something well that compensates for the other's shortcomings. Each half of the Cubs' duo behind the plate complements the other. That just doesn't answer the question of how Amaya emerges as a long-term starter out of his time working with Kelly. The easy answer is that he might not have to. Kelly's an impending free agent. There may be an organic changing-of-the-guard at the end of 2026 that leads to Amaya's graduation into the bulk of the playing time, just by staying the course. In a logistical sense, that concept of "staying the course" might be the ticket for Amaya to start to shift the playing time distribution early. It's easy to forget about Kelly's struggles for the better part of last year's second half. It's easier still to forget what Amaya turned in on the stat sheet prior to his oblique injury. Factor in the areas where Amaya has the defensive advantages, and it isn't difficult to imagine a world where his own skill set does the work. Last year's volume for Kelly may play to his advantage early (as evidenced by the projections liking him for more playing time in 2026), but there's very much a path for Amaya to do the things he does well in a small sample early on, forcing his way into a more even distribution as it wears on. View full article

Image courtesy of © Michael McLoone-Imagn Images Earlier this week, Matt Trueblood explored whether a pair of Chicago Cubs infielders can continue to thrive in a specific nuance within their offensive skill set. That was an analysis of squared-up contact off the bats of Nico Hoerner and Alex Bregman. Relatedly, today, let's dig into Hoerner, and how some of that clean contact translated into power production as last year wore on. In 2025, Nico Hoerner had his best offensive season to date. His wRC+, at 109, was a shade above the previous career mark set in 2022, while his strikeout (7.6%) and contact (89.8%) rates each checked in above anything else he'd turned in prior to last year. Such obscene contact rates aren't always indicative of quality offensive performance on their own (see Luis Arráez), but the combination of all-fields contact and the baserunning component helped him be one of the Cubs' most important bats despite the extremely limited power inherent to his skill set. It's that power aspect of his game that we're most interested in. Hoerner's .097 isolated power was his lowest output since 2021, and his 30.3% hard-hit rate checked in below his career average. However, looking at the full-season numbers might be hiding a small breakout. Hoerner's second half of the season was better than his first in almost every way. He went for a 122 wRC+, with an average that was nearly 30 points higher and a much better OBP than in the first half. His walk rate was one percentage point higher (6.6%), while his strikeout remained about the same. He also hit for slightly more power. First Half: .094 ISO, 27.5 Hard-Hit%, 17.6% Line Drives, 16.0% Fly Balls Second Half: .100, 34.3%, 24.3%, 30.0% The first thing worth noting there is the minimal gap in ISO figures. Isolated power shows only how many extra bases (beyond singles) a player produces per at-bat, but if we were to throw in slugging percentage to fold in his extra singles, we'd see a jump from .377 in the first half to .418 in the second. His expected slugging increased much more, though. Hoerner went from a .361 xSLG in the first half to a .432 in the second. As it was, he ended up with fewer doubles but more home runs than he had in the first half, all in roughly 100 fewer plate appearances. Hoerner was, objectively, a more powerful hitter in the second half of 2025 than he was in the first. That brings us to the natural question of whether or not we'll see any carryover early in 2026. The squared-up contact explored by Trueblood does not necessarily beget power outcomes. The mechanics of a swing are prone to too much nuance to simply declare a hitter who can square the ball up can also actually drive it. In Hoerner's case, there doesn't appear to be anything specific in those mechanics that enhanced his power as the season wore on. His bat speed changed only marginally throughout the months, while each of his attack direction and attack angle fluctuated in noisy ways that don't yield much of a narrative. If we're going to find evidence of real power development, we'll probably find it in his pitch selection. Hoerner's extra-base power comes mostly against fastballs. Fifteen of his doubles, three of his four triples, and three of his seven home runs came against that pitch type. However, there did not appear to be a concerted effort from Hoerner to swing at more fastballs as the year wore on: If there's anything in the fastball aspect, it's that Hoerner swung at more of them inside the zone in the last three months of the year. In July, he swung at 60.2% of fastballs in the zone, which increased to 63.8% in August and 66.4% in September. For a certified trend, however, we need to keep looking. The following is (first) where Hoerner's ISO came from in the first half of the season, and (second) his swing rate by location for that period: The minimal hot spots on his ISO chart are unsurprising, given how little we saw from that aspect of Hoerner's output in the first half. He needed to be able to drop the bat head on the ball and get around it, low and in, to produce power in that span. It's also not surprising that the range of hot spots in the swing rate is as expansive as it is; Hoerner is an aggressive hitter. He got more patient in the second half, though. When we shift each of these zones to the stretch after the All-Star Game, things get interesting. Potentially. While still a pretty wide set, Hoerner's swings became at least somewhat more concentrated on the middle and inner parts of the zone. Where has Hoerner been able to generate the most power in his career? You guessed it: Because of the small sample size, we can't say for sure that this is intentional, but it's a noteworthy change. If Hoerner is more committed to selectivity within the zone, emphasizing the locations where he can generate power but attacking in-zone fastballs, he could sustain a higher level of power production than he's shown for most of his time in the majors. We certainly shouldn't be expecting Hoerner to evolve into a 20-homer guy in 2026. Even his increased power output didn't put him on pace for anything like that. However, Hoerner seems to be honing an approach that can work in a more consistent way, with a balance of elite hitting for average and modest but measurable pop. View full article

Image courtesy of © Michael McLoone-Imagn Images Over the weekend, MLB Network announced their annual list of the Top 100 players in Major League Baseball. The Chicago Cubs were well-represented on the list, with their four names — Alex Bregman, Pete Crow-Armstrong, Michael Busch, and Seiya Suzuki — tied for the fourth-most on a given roster. Of course, the more notable aspect of the release of the list is the player that was not included: Nico Hoerner. It's not just the fact that Hoerner finished being only Crow-Armstrong as the Cubs' most valuable player by fWAR in 2025 (4.8). Nor is it that said fWAR finished 20th among all position players last year. Either one likely should have qualified him for inclusion, especially when one considers Hoerner's offensive skill set that featured a blend of a 99th percentile strikeout rate (7.6 percent) and whiff rate (11.2 percent), while he finished in the 98th percentile on the other side of the ball in Outs Above Average (14). It's not even that his omission disrespects his value within the broader scope of the sport. It's that it entirely disregards Hoerner's standing within his own position. MLB Networks' list featured just four players at the keystone: Ketel Marte (No. 19), Jazz Chisholm Jr. (No. 61), Brice Turang (No. 62), and Jose Altuve (No. 81). If not elite, Marte certainly lives in the second tier of positional performers. Chisholm finished with an even split of 31 home runs and 31 steals. Turang had an offensive breakout in his third year in the league, hitting more homers (18) than he did in his first two years combined while adding 24 swipes and playing exemplary defense. Jose Altuve continued to do the things he's always done. If you were to list the top five second basemen in the sport at present, it'd be a tough sell to exclude any of them. There's a reason Hoerner sat atop the WAR leaderboard for the position, though. He, quite obviously, lacks the power upside of the other four. His .097 isolated power was his lowest in a full season even by his modest standards. That shouldn't understate his value elsewhere, though. Hoerner's contact rate (89.9 percent) was more than seven percent better than Altuve's. His strikeout rate was more than seven percent better than Marte's. His comprehensive baserunning metric (BsR) checked in at 4.5, with Turang's 2.9 checking in second at the position.. And that doesn't include the defensive component. Hoerner's OAA (14) at second was miles ahead of each of the names included in the Top 100. Chisholm Jr is the next name on the list of this group at No. 4 (8 OAA). Marte (1) follows at No. 20, with Altuve (0) and Turang (0) bringing their precisely average figures to the table. It's also worth noting that Altuve spent nearly 400 innings in left field while Chisholm Jr was at third base for 238 frames. Not that splitting time at another position should be disqualifying in any way, but if there was any semblance of a positional spread on this list, then it becomes even more perplexing with that fact in mind. Regardless, when measuring Hoerner against his keystone counterparts, it starts to become clear what this particular list values. Those values do not, apparently, lie in contact, baserunning, or defense, but more likely power. From a positional standpoint, MLB Network wanted louder names on the list than a steady, reliable, contact-oriented hitter with an elite glove. Not that we're suggesting that compiling this list is easy. At a given time, there are 780 active players in Major League Baseball. Roughly 12 percent of the league is featured as a result, or roughly three players from every roster if it was evenly spread. Having to include a balance of position players and pitchers makes it all the more cumbersome. Even when you start to reduce some of the percentages as to how many players, on average, might be selected or the overall percentage of names on the list, it's wildly difficult to make a case against Hoerner's inclusion. And we've only discussed it within the context of his position. The good news is that a list such of this can be read as arbitrary enough, given the names and selection factors that may have been involved, to ultimately not matter. It's nice to have the loud skill sets on your roster, and the Cubs have some of that scattered throughout this group of players. Ideally, though, a list such as this doesn't lead to an under-appreciation of the stability offered by a player like Nico Hoerner, who is as worthy as any of those who were fortunate enough to be recognized. View full article

Image courtesy of © Michael McLoone-Imagn Images Colin Rea was always meant to be a swingman with the Chicago Cubs. He possesses the ideal skill set and a modest history of amicably filling such a role. The issue is that the fortunes of the 2025 didn't allow it. If you recall, there was a battle for the fifth spot in the Cubs' rotation last spring training. That competition essential boiled down to Rea and Ben Brown, with the other four spots occupied by Justin Steele, Shota Imanaga, Matthew Boyd, and Jameson Taillon. The job, of course, went to Brown, while Rea was relegated to bulk relief and the occasional spot start. He ended up limited to a pair of multi-inning stints across three appearances prior to his first start on April 13. From there, though, he gained a role which he'd never relinquish. A combination of factors led to Rea making 27 starts in 32 appearances last year. Steele was injured and lost for the season early; each of Imanaga and Taillon struggled to stay healthy; and Brown's own unstable performance ran throughout the year regardless of his role. From that April point in the calendar onward, only two of Rea's appearances were in relief, and even those were both 5 1/3 inning jobs following Drew Pomeranz serving as an opener. It was a season that ended up nearly identical to Rea's work in the prior season in Milwaukee. His 27 starts in 32 appearances was the same as in 2024, while each of his 3.95 ERA, 19.2 K%, and 6.6 BB% were just a shade off his work with the Brewers. The most notable change came in the form of a 10.6 percent home run rate that was more than three percent better than his rate in the previous season. Now looking ahead to 2026, it looks as if Rea now has an opportunity to settle back into the role that was tailor-made for him. The Cubs will enter the season with Cade Horton firmly in the rotation mix, followed by fresh acquisition Edward Cabrera and holdovers in Boyd, Taillon, and Imanaga. Steele's return is imminent, as well. That's already six names for five spots. Recent track records of the six names atop the rotation depth chart aren't terrific on the health side, however. For Rea, starting opportunities will remain even with Javier Assad and Jordan Wicks each still floating around the 40-man roster. In the meantime, he'll ply his trade in the swingman role he was meant to serve in 2025. FanGraphs has Rea making just five percent of the starts in 2026 and comprising seven percent of innings in relief. Baseball Prospectus is similar, with six percent of starts and eight percent of the relief share. Either case represents a somewhat diminished capacity considering how crucial he was last season, but this is also the role Rea was made for. In his roughly 600 innings as a major-league pitcher, 544 have come as a starter and the other 62 have been in relief. The numbers between each read as follows: As Starter: 4.65 ERA, 4.66 FIP, 19.5 K%, 7.3 BB%, .326 wOBA against As Reliever: 2.32 ERA, 3.52 FIP, 16.3 K%, 5.6 BB%, .270 wOBA against While the splits read as somewhat jarring, particularly on the run prevention side, it's this that begins to paint the picture of why Colin Rea: Swingman is such an essential component on the 2026 Cubs' pitching staff. The ideal swingman isn't something that's necessarily quantifiable, but more of a broad skill set. It's an idea furthered by his Statcast percentile distribution: The platonic ideal swingman is someone whose distribution looks quite like this. You're not necessarily looking for an arm who absolutely thrives in a particular respect such as velocity or movement in a way that begets high strikeout tendencies. That's a toolbox better served for an inning or matchup-based deployment in relief and prone to much more variability. Further, starters like that are more difficult to find, as being able to stretch that impact across a five or six innings is reserved for a select few that live in the upper tier of performance. Instead, you're looking for something closer to what Rea offers: a dependable set of skills and a high floor. As such, these are precisely the type of metrics we're looking for out of someone in a relief and spot-start capacity. His walk rates are steady regardless of role. He's adept enough at avoiding quality contact that you know he can survive an inning or be run out there for a few at a time, as we saw in four of his five relief appearances last season. Even when accounting for his lack of strikeouts, his low walk and solid contact figures are indicative of the type of stability he brings to the equation, no matter the role. It was probably unrealistic to expect Rea to duplicate his 2025 numbers considering even a modest 1.9 fWAR was far above anything he'd posted in the years prior. But having him settle into a role as a true swingman is the ideal setup for the Cubs. Even six-deep in the rotation at present, it's a starting group with a sketchy past on the health side. Factor in a desire to give someone like Matthew Boyd a break or ease Justin Steele back in, and you have an easy plug-and-pitch option in Rea. As many logistical things are still to be determined with their staff, Craig Counsell and company have at least one certainty on their roster. View full article

Image courtesy of © Benny Sieu-Imagn Images Ahead of every spring exhibition season, a large number of non-roster invitees are announced. While the Chicago Cubs have yet to announce their full group, we can already spot some differences from the 2025 assemblage. Last year's Cubs brought 20 players into camp as non-roster invitees. It was a relatively productive group: Brad Keller was an essential bullpen contributor, and Reese McGuire provided key coverage behind the plate in Miguel Amaya's absence. But the context of that roster left that group little room to make an impact, particularly with respect to the positional depth. Generally, the non-roster path is an effective way to build out the back end of a bullpen and (as we'll discuss today) a bench. However, the 2025 Cubs had Gage Workman in camp as a Rule 5 draft pick; Jon Berti in on a guaranteed contract; and Vidal Bruján and Ben Cowles each also occupying spots on the 40-man roster. That meant the Cubs were, on some level, locked into evaluating those specific players for spots on the bench to start the year. Save McGuire, Nicky Lopez would be the lone non-roster invitee (who wasn't already an organizational prospect) to spend any amount of time at the major-league level with Chicago in 2025. It's hard to argue that the guys who clogged the 40-man in camp last spring helped the Cubs. None of Workman, Bruján, Berti, or Lopez made it through the summer. McGuire hung around given the need for catching depth, but there's also an inflexibility wrought by a third catcher on the roster. Had Amaya returned for more than one day between injuries, even McGuire probably would have been bumped. As such, it comes as no surprise that the team has adopted a different style of building a bench for 2026. As things stand, the Cubs have a full 40-man roster. At least five of those names could offer support in a reserve role in a way that we didn't see last year: Matt Shaw, Tyler Austin, Justin Dean, Kevin Alcántara, and, once again, Cowles. Unlike last year's set occupying the 40-man, you're not looking at a handful of players whose value lies purely in versatility (Bruján, Berti) or clinging to hope that some upside may actually still exist, despite all evidence to the contrary (Lopez). There's actual value for the team to deploy these guys in a reserve capacity this season. Shaw is the most obvious, given the upside flashed with both the bat and the glove in his rookie season. Barring a trade, the Alex Bregman signing pushes him into a role where he could see action four or five days a week, depending on positional rotation. If he's able to competently play the outfield, that only enhances his utility. On paper, he's a massive upgrade to the bench. While Austin has some much less versatility—he's on the roster to hit lefties and play a little first base—he's a younger and higher-upside version of Justin Turner, who filled that role last year. Dean brings speed (27 steals in 90 games in Triple A last year) on a level that the team was unable to find on their bench last season, which could push Alcántara into a full-time gig in Iowa. If not, Alcántara's theoretical upside is more than any reserve player from 2025. If the depth chart reaches Cowles, you're looking at a power bump from Bruján and decent speed lying within the versatility he adds. The team also has three non-roster invitees coming in on the positional side, in Scott Kingery, Christian Bethancourt, and Chas McCormick. While Kingery is no more or less than this year's Lopez, Bethancourt performed well in a short stint with the Cubs in 2024, and McCormick is two years removed from being a really promising outfielder. There's still coverage at catcher and the potential for an impactful fourth outfielder, if McCormick can regain any semblance of his old form. In short, while there is a certain level of rigidity inherent in a full 40-man roster, the Cubs haven't backed themselves into a corner. There might only be faint hope for real value from McCormick, but you can afford to roll the dice on a player like that when there's more certainty elsewhere on the bench. Being able to move Shaw to the bench gives the team better positional depth than it had last year. After the struggle to find any semblance of stability in that unit last season, Jed Hoyer and company have worked their way toward establishing something much more helpful for 2026. View full article

Image courtesy of © David Banks-Imagn Images For the first time in a handful of years, the Chicago Cubs entered an offseason with year-over-year certainty behind the plate. While there are still some questions about the long-term projectability of the catcher spot, the team knew that they'd have a tandem of Carson Kelly and Miguel Amaya holding down the position in 2026. Such certainty is largely due to the late-stage breakout from the former. Kelly's career-high 421 plate appearances did stem largely from Amaya working his way through multiple injuries. He was also able to spin such heavy work into career marks just about everywhere you look on the stat sheet, if not something very close to resembling one. Each of his .249 average and 9.6 percent barrel rate sat atop his output in each, while his .179 isolated power and 40.3 percent hard-hit rate each checked in as his best work since 2019. His .333 on-base percentage was his best since 2021. At no point over a full season has Kelly's fWAR been higher than the 2.6 figure he posted in his debut with the Cubs. That 2025 output from Kelly has him firmly in the driver's seat to get the majority of the timeshare over Amaya, even with the latter's growth over the last couple of years. Each of FanGraphs and Baseball Prospectus project him for 55 percent of the time at catcher to Amaya's 40. Projections thus far, however, don't love him. Each available model bears some level of regression virtually everywhere. Which leads to questions as to what Kelly did that made him so successful as a hitter in 2025 and whether it's something he can duplicate throughout the 2026 campaign. There were a few factors at play that allowed Kelly to discover the offensive success he had in 2025. The first was in his discipline. His 21.9 percent chase rate was his lowest in six years, while his 20.6 percent whiff rate was his best in seven. He also zeroed in on breaking and off-speed pitches, both of which represented his two highest rates of hard contact (42.2 percent for breaking pitches & 40.0 percent for off-speed). In addition, there weren't necessarily mechanical changes at play, but there was at least one notable timing development: The negative indicator before the number indicates the pull side. Kelly leaned heavily into pull-side tendencies, which is logical considering the lower velocity at which those pitch types are approaching the plate. His Pull% grew from 41.4 percent in 2024 to 45.4 percent in 2025. As a timing mechanism, it's not something that's always going to be in a hitter's control. But if Kelly can continue to maintain the approach that allows him to turn around on pitches that are easier to pull as a general operating standard, then there's reason to believe in some carryover, especially given the fly-ball tendencies that increased along with his newfound love for pulling the ball. Kelly's Pull% and fly-ball rate didn't necessarily grow in step with one another. But he did bump the fly-ball rate up about three percent (42.7). Those two factors resulted in a PullAIR% of 23.9, a figure that ranked 47th among 251 qualifying position players. The lead-up to it makes it repeatable; Kelly attacked breaking and off-speed pitches rather than relying on fastball contact that more so begets hard contact. That he's attacking those types of pitches lends itself to the notion of being replicable, even if you're worried about the bat slowing down from catcher that'll be 32 in July and is coming off his highest volume of work at the plate. The other things that Kelly did well are things he's always done. His 19.0 percent strikeout rate was a notch below the 20.2 percent mark for his career. His walk rate, at 10.7 percent, was in the neighborhood of a career 9.9 percent one. He's always been a relatively disciplined hitter relative to the position he plays. The difference is that he was able to parlay that discipline into something of actual value. And given that we're not talking about a hitter jumping all over fastballs or doing something vastly different on the mechanical side, it doesn't seem at all unrealistic for him to do it again in 2026. View full article