Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Bertz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Bertz

  1. I'll be curious to see what they do with Rea. It's similar where you can picking it up either way. On the positive side they're going to trade from the Assad/Wicks/Brown pool which will inherently be for something fun, or on the negative side he's going to hold down the 5th starter spot until Steele is ready. But I feel like declining it is closer to being an unambiguous sign they plan on doing something(s) fun with the rotation.
  2. Shota literally just declined a deal for one year with an option at similar numbers.
  3. I still think we should all keep in mind that the likely outcome here is still Shota sticks around on the qualifying offer.
  4. Yeah it's annoying because this is both how a very good offseason would start and also how a very bad one would start. I'll also say IMO this does not point to the specific good offseason you want (big FA bat and trade for a cost controlled SP). I feel like in that scenario you lock in these solid but unspectacular pitchers on solid but unspectacular deals. If you do want a level set and a reminder that we don't really know what's coming I highly recommed revisiting the Matt Thaiss thread from last winter. The usual suspects were all *very* certain they knew what it meant and it's quite funny in retrospect.
  5. I commented this on Trueblood's post this AM, but I would suspect letting Kittredge go is a sign they're planning to swim in deeper waters. If you wanted to build another bullpen on a shoestring you probably pick up this option and then make a handful of Caleb Thielbar and Eli Morgan type moves. Personally I would have kept Kittredge AND gone after e.g. a Devin Williams. But if you're shopping for two SPs maybe that's not doable....
  6. I hope the team makes a big swing at a reliever this year. I'd honestly do Devin Williams if he doesn't get QO'd. The arguments against a big investment in relief are the year to year volatility inherent with relievers plus the opportunity cost of spending on relief instead of other positions (largeley tying back to point #1). Given that the team is fairly complete from the outset of the offseasin here, I don't think the latter point is as strong of a consideration as it might have been the past few years. There's only so much Jed can spend his money on, and the baseline at most positions on the roster is high enough that spending on the bullpen might honestly be the best bang for your buck play. I think Kittredge might be the canary in the coal mine for the team's intentions. The only reason I can think of for not wanting to pick up his option is if you're going to go for a bigger fish. If you wanted to scrimp on the bullpen you'd pick up the option and pair it with a handful of Caleb Thielbar/Eli Morgan type moves.
  7. The Cubs were +45 wRAA (wOBA converted to runs basically) in April/May, 3rd in the league. Take out Tucker's 15 and they're still 5th. The Cubs were 4th in wRC+ in September with Tucker mostly AWOL. I do NOT think that the Cubs are a top 5 offense without Tucker, but this arbitrary endpoints nonsense is nonsense. Also, if we are going to play the arbitrary endpoints game, shouldn't you want Shota gone? He was an absolute wet fart down the stretch.
  8. Really? "If you exclude the times they were really good they were slightly below average?" Why would anyone take that seriously?
  9. bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
  10. I don't expect them to give out multiple large FA pitching contracts. I said right there I would expect them to do one FA and one trade.
  11. I figured it was overwhelming likely that Shota would stick around, and that it was roughly a coin flip as to whether it'd be via his player option or via accepting a qualifying offer. The latter is still probably how this ends, but I think clearly the odds of him leaving are higher than I expected. If the team doesn't give him a qualifying offer, to me it says one of three things. One fun, one boring, one sad. Fun - The team wants to go out and grab two impact starting pitchers. Right now the question is if they go the free agent or trade route, with an extra rotation spot you can do both Boring - The team *really* doesn't want to go into next winter with three starting pitchers slated for free agency. Shota's going to get replaced by someone roughly Shota caliber under control for multiple years. Say a Mitch Keller trade or Zac Gallen in free agency Sad - The team thinks Shota is cooked, and considers him turning down his player option a bullet dodged
  12. He presumably gets the qualifying offer from here?
  13. I'd be very excited about King as the second of two additions. Maybe Shota leaves and we do something like Joe Ryan and King? Maybe we do King and a bat? But yeah as much as I like King and you look at him and he's clearly Tommy Hottovy coded, a guy who missed three months with a shoulder injury and then was pretty bad from there on is not someone who can be your big offseason fish. Not at this part of the win curve.
  14. Okay. I official forgive him for the approximately 75 false starts before the bye
  15. I believe all the opt outs to this point have been exactly what was expected. Possible exception of Ha Seong Kim? Though he's not really relevant to us.
  16. It's pretty much bottom of the scale contact ability. That's not an automatic no from me, but I would need to be morr desperate for help either at 3B or just broadly to add power to the lineup. What I will say is that while I'm an "absolutely the horsefeathers not" vote on Geno Suarez for similar reasons, Murakami at least had age on his side. At 25 he's still likely ascendant. It also is worth noting hat his ZiPS projection is very strong.
  17. Okay this is more like the Rockies we know and love
  18. A little more (some good, some brake pushing)
  19. Really looking forward to Pedro at Iowa this year
  20. I'd be very surprised. That said If this ends up being the case I'd expect it means one or both of these things: - Imanaga at 1/22 is solid value in a vacuum, but Jed wants to open up the roster spot so that he can REALLY beef up the rotation. Right now we're wondering of he's going to make a trade or sign someone of consequence. If Shota leaves he can do both. Even if he's not shopping at the very top of the market, he could do something like Sandy Alcantara and Shane Bieber and quickly remake the rotation - Shota is very likely to accept the qualifying offer if it's given, and that would mean 3/5s of the rotation (along with Boyd and Taillon) are all set to hit free agency together next winter. I could understand not wanting to voluntarily put yourself in that situation
  21. Everything is not perfect with Caleb but between stuff like this being a regular occurrence and the fact that we now have a legitimate "lol you left him too much time" QB for the first time ever it's really hard for me to sweat the smaller stuff
  22. Teoscar Hernandez's defense makes me angry and I don't even like the Dodgers. If he was our right fielder I'd lose my mind.
×
×
  • Create New...