Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Outshined_One

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,178

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Outshined_One

  1. Outshined_One
    It's so refreshing to have a team in Chicago that looks at "good, but not great" results and decides to upgrade when the opportunity presents itself. What a coup. I'm still floored by this.
  2. Outshined_One
    Un-horsefeathers-real. WOW. They're going to go for it, aren't they?
  3. Outshined_One
    Well, if nothing else, this game should put one of the final nails in the "start Bagent over Fields" insanity.
  4. Outshined_One
    He's not going to sleep with you.
  5. Outshined_One
    This is where I fall. If you need him to start 2-3 games, he might not lose you those games, but don't expect anything more than Shane Matthews.
  6. Outshined_One
    Steele/Taillon/Wicks/Assad is a reasonably good foundation, and it's possible (albeit unlikely) the Cubs retain Hendricks, but coming out of the offseason with a top level SP should be the team's priority.
  7. Outshined_One
    Hendricks' option is a club option. He's fine as a 4th/5th starter, but not at $16m. He's gone.
  8. Outshined_One
    If Sweat doesn't sign an extension, Poles should be fired immediately. Crap happens with guys you draft and that's unpredictable. Free agents tend to be old and a roll of the dice. But trading for a dude with a second rounder and only getting a couple of games out of him? That's almost as bad as trading for Rick horsefeathers Mirer.
  9. Outshined_One
    More info: Flush is the one who brought these guys onto the team in the first place. This is a really awful look for him, because either he is a dimwit who's knowingly bringing aggro jackoffs onto this team, or he is a horrifically bad judge of character. ETA: For once, I stand by autocorrect on something.
  10. Outshined_One
    Remember when the Claypool trade was a defensible overpay? Like that. Although hopefully this also won't backfire in spectacular fashion.
  11. Outshined_One
    PTR strikes again.
  12. Outshined_One
    We could always run a Most Popular Poster contest again.
  13. Outshined_One
    I was thinking along these same lines with Wright over Fred Miller as another possibility. Nevertheless, blech.
  14. Outshined_One
    Does Kirk have any more kids or nephews?
  15. Outshined_One
    The dimwits clamoring for "run da ball and play great deeefenssss" with this team also overlooks a key aspect of the 2006 Super Bowl team: the sheer level of talent they had, particularly on defense and special teams. They had one guy who ended up in the HOF (Urlacher), multiple guys who could end up in the HOF (Briggs, Hester, Tillman, Kreutz), and a bunch of really talented guys on the lines. How many guys on this current team would have been a starter on the 2006 team? Maybe 5?
  16. Outshined_One
    Dumb scenario time. Minnesota calls inquiring as to a Fields trade. They offer a 2024 2nd and a conditional 2nd in 2025 depending on Fields' performance. Do you take it?
  17. Outshined_One
    Dat Baguette is such a fighter! He grinds tru da games and you can tell he don't quit, not like dat Fields guy. Whadda a thug he is, tinks he's better dan he is. Dey should convert him to wide receiver where he belongs! Dat would solve da Bearssss offensive woes. I'll hang up and lissen fer yer response.
  18. Outshined_One
    That's pretty much the only thing left to do at this point. They're not going to win any meaningful games with Bagent, so might as well see if Fields can somehow, some way, by some miracle, flip the switch.
  19. Outshined_One
    One of the two picks, sure, that's believable. Unless they take two QBs, then both will be guaranteed busts.
  20. Outshined_One
    So what do we think with the inevitable two picks in the Top 10, QB and Edge? QB and WR? WR and DT?
  21. Outshined_One
    Man, this White Sox season feels like it'll never end.
  22. Outshined_One
    That number gets higher the further into the draft you get. Yes, there are exceptions, but you're more likely to find a good QB in the first than in any other round. The only difference is the first round busts are higher profile than others; otherwise, no one cares at the national level if a 5th round QB never sees an NFL snap.
  23. Outshined_One
    Admittedly, I thought Trubisky was going to have a career rebound when he landed in Pittsburgh. Whoopsie.
  24. Outshined_One
    I hate how this team is just an extended version of Groundhog Day at the QB position. The team drafts a promising young QB in the first round with questionable decision-making skills to go along with physical talent, only for said QB to regress and frequently crap the bed in meaningful situations, and then a noodle-armed unheralded backup comes along and appears mildly competent, yet unable to throw the ball longer than 15 yards without an empty pocket and a running start. I'd love for Bagent to show out and demonstrate he has the in-game arm strength to be a good quality starting QB in the NFL, but we've seen this story so many times over the last 25 years.
  25. Outshined_One
    Pretty much spot on, but it needs (1) how old Rocky was when the Bears won in '86, (2) dog whistles regarding Fields' and Bagent's work habits and motivations, and (3) a completely unrealistic and off the wall trade proposal ("Can we trade Fields fer dat Atlanta tight end?") to make it 100% accurate. I also would accept "Bob from Elmwood Park" or "Fred in Antioch" as acceptable caller names.
×
×
  • Create New...