For example, Edmonds had a 1.061 OPS in '04 but his OPS dropped to .918 when batting after Pujols this year. Pujols musta slumped big time. Care to reference the relevant parts of the rules for voting on it? So you might say Lee is more valuable to any given team? Doesn't that contradict what you said earlier? Let's say KC had a healthy Bonds all year and lead them to 70 wins with a standard Bondsian season (please keep the steroid debate somewhere else) The team is still brutal, why is it okay, as you said being valuable is only about leading teams towards the playoffs. Nevermind that a player could far and away be the best player in the league, he didn't win!! Even assuming that's true for the entire first half, which is a ridiculously long time, doesn't Lee pretty much make up for it all in this hypothetical by having a 2nd half offense of him and either Ramirez or Nomar while Pujols's offense was somewhat major league caliber? You honestly believe any of that? You think luminaries like Neifi, Macias and Corey Patterson were seeing garbage because pitchers thought that scrub Lee won't be driving him in anyways??