Tryptamine

Yup, ump blows

Shota missing his spots early on.

If Peralta is getting that strike zone then there's going to be about no offense today.

I think he can be very good too, I'm just not sure it's going to be in 2025.

This is more or less where I'm at. I think Loveland was a completely reasonable pick just like Warren or Jalen Walker would have been. At #39, though it wasn't a position of need, I think Burden was clearly their BPA and I'll never be angry for taking BPA, especially with Henderson gone. Trading #41 is where things started to go downhill. Their first trade was #41, #72 and #240 for #56, #62 and #109 This inherently was not an awful deal. At #56 Trapilo was kind of a meh pick. I don't hate it, but it was extremely bland he's more or less injury insurance. I legitimately liked Turner quite a bit at #62 I'm just about positive they thought they could land Skattebo at #109 and when he wasn't they traded back landing picks #132 and #169. Unfortunately for the Bears, there was then a run at RB that saw 4 more RB go off the board before the Bears would pick again at #132. Instead the Bears make the worst and most puzzling pick of their draft picking Hyppolite who, unless the Bears know something the rest of the league doesn't, was a massive reach. At #169 they take Frazier who a legitimately good value pick at the time with some upside. So it basically becomes do you like Trapilo, Turner, Hyppolite and Frazier more than you would have liked adding a duo at #41 and #72 like one of Ezeiraku/Tuimoloau/Ersery and one of Landon Jackson/Unmanmielen/Kaleb Johnson. It's even possible Turner was still there at #72 if the Bear were infatuated with him. Personally I'd have much rather had the latter of the two and that's ignoring that with #240 they still probably could have gotten Monongai who they eventually took at #232. They then traded down yet again giving up #148 for #195 and a 2024 4th with the Rams so we can probably safely assume it's going to be in the back half of the 4th roughly #130. It wasn't a homerun or anything but there wasn't anyone I was dying for them to have between #148 and #169 and they added a pick next year that's high enough that you might get a starter out of it At #195 they took Luke Newman who is most likely going to be your generic back up interior lineman. I feel like they only got 2 sure fire guys who are going to see lots of action and a bunch of other guys who are either rotational pieces or depth. I wouldn't not at all be surprised if Turner ends up being the 3rd guy who sees a lot of action.

It was a perfectly reasonable pick. Jeanty was off the board, the 3 best OL were off the board and the drop off from Carter to the next Edge rusher was enormous. The only real complaint I could see is that they skipped the safer TE with a more diverse skill set and chased the enormous offensive upside of Loveland. I just hope he'll be at least an adequate blocker.

I'm really baffled at people acting like Loveland was a big reach. He wasn't even the consensus best TE prospect and, I believe it was ESPN, had him ranked 7th overall.

Probably the best option of a bad situation. The Bears almost assuredly got quadruple sniped on RB during the draft so here we are.

So the Rockies have reached a level of putrid that even the White Sox are in awe of. They're now 4-23(.148). That means they're on pace to go 24-138. This would be the most losses in baseball history and the 2nd lowest winning percentage in baseball history. For comparison, last year's historically awful White Sox team went 41-121(.253).

See I'm not sure this is true. Swift's refusal to just take the yard or two and to try and hit a HR put them in so many 2nd and 12, 2 and 13 situations that it more or less forced them into passing situations.

Well I can say with near certainty we're getting another year of Swift as the lead back which is honestly just a failure when it was the 2nd biggest need going into the draft.

Did they seriously trade down yet again? Is the plan to fill this team with a as many mediocre prospects as possible?

I find this draft extremely mediocre. I had no issues with #10 and no issues with #39, especially if they really had him that high up their board, but after that it really falls off pretty hard. I didn't dislike Trapilo and I actually liked getting Turner, but I'd have much preferred just taking Ezeiruaku at 41 instead. I wonder if they got snake bit twice with Henderson going at #38 and Skattebo going at #105.

I'm hoping this isn't right, because it's just me browsing the picks, but did they really give up 109 for 132 and 233? That's frankly awful if it's accurate.

I'm at work, is ESPN broken or did the Bears trade the pick back to the Bills again?

Take one today and wrap up yet another series against a playoff contender.

Nah, he's definitely draft worthy. He was never worthy of top 10 , but he's a pretty legitimate 2nd round talent.

There's Turner, I feel better

Well Denver has their Sproles.

Disappointed in the Ravens

Not going to lie, it was my first thought

Goodbye Scourton, man what a terrible horsefeathers trade

Well Ersrey is gone

If none of Scourton, Ersrey or Turner make it to 56, I'm officially in the borderline hate position on this trade

Well there goes all the Edge rushers I was excited for.