You can't eliminate the risk of a bad deal because of the dollars we're talking about, but you do have to minimize risk to allow for future spending and improvements. Nearly everyone with a brain in their heads cringed when the Soriano deal was announced. Not because of the annual value, but because of the 8 freaking years in length. $17-18M for 5 years wouldn't have been bad, but the those last 3 years are going to kill the payroll. Which, getting back to Byrd, is why there wouldn't be outrage at a 2/$12 deal, but when you go to 3/$20-21M, people start getting a little bent out of shape. The next 2 years, you probably need him, but why give him the extra year when you may well have production available from Colvin, Burke, or even Jackson in CF by that time.