Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

with LA offering 3 yrs/$40 mil, there is no way the cubs can compete financially. the only way he joins the cubs is if the idea of playing for a contender and knowing who his manager will be outweighs the extra $$ the dodgers are throwing at him. personally, i couldn't imagine signing a 3 yr deal with a team and not knowing who i'd be playing for everyday. guess we'll find out within 24 hrs.

 

i just don't feel good about this; i see him chasing the dough.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
with LA offering 3 yrs/$40 mil, there is no way the cubs can compete financially. the only way he joins the cubs is if the idea of playing for a contender and knowing who his manager will be outweighs the extra $$ the dodgers are throwing at him. personally, i couldn't imagine signing a 3 yr deal with a team and not knowing who i'd be playing for everyday. guess we'll find out within 24 hrs.

 

i just don't feel good about this; i see him chasing the dough.

 

I agree about the Dodgers chances right now but I have a feeling that Hendry is going to up the ante in the 11th hour (I hope so anyway).

 

It's hard to say, publically, that a guy is your number one offseason priority then let him go without a fight.

Edited by Blueheart05
Posted
with LA offering 3 yrs/$40 mil, there is no way the cubs can compete financially. the only way he joins the cubs is if the idea of playing for a contender and knowing who his manager will be outweighs the extra $$ the dodgers are throwing at him. personally, i couldn't imagine signing a 3 yr deal with a team and not knowing who i'd be playing for everyday. guess we'll find out within 24 hrs.

 

i just don't feel good about this; i see him chasing the dough.

 

Actually, the Cubs could compete financially with the offer (3/$40m), but they would probably choose not to, and it would be hard to blame them for a guy, who's OPS has never exceeded .800, and who's OBP has not exceeded .352 during the last 4 seasons.

 

Just pass on him Jim!

Posted
I think LA is the last team he wants to go to, they'll have to significantly outbid us and Atlanta to get him. Right now, they're around 13 per. I think if Hendry increases to 11 per over 5 years, we'll be the more attractive team to him.
Posted

I hope he does go to the Dodgers.

 

1. He is not that good

2. He does not fill a hole (I don't need a "true" leadoff batter)

3. The Cubs can spend the extra dough on player development and scouting

 

I hope Hendry doesn't get caught up in the chase.

Posted
I think LA is the last team he wants to go to, they'll have to significantly outbid us and Atlanta to get him. Right now, they're around 13 per. I think if Hendry increases to 11 per over 5 years, we'll be the more attractive team to him.

 

Why do you think LA is the last team he wants to go to?

Posted
I think LA is the last team he wants to go to, they'll have to significantly outbid us and Atlanta to get him. Right now, they're around 13 per. I think if Hendry increases to 11 per over 5 years, we'll be the more attractive team to him.

 

Reportedly, Furcal is torn, in part, because he likes the Dodgers 3 year offer. Specifically,the idea of 13MM per year and having the ability to be a FA in 3 years versus the stability of being locked in (at the same salary) for 5 years. I think the Cubs need to restructure their offer so that it includes a player option in year three. I also think they need to increase the money by a million or 1.5.

Posted

at this point id be tempted to pull out of the furcal race. anything more than 3-years/$40M is just insane. he's good, an anchor at the top of the order, but ponying up 6-years/$60M is just way too much for him.

 

i cant imagine hendry adding a 6th year. a 5th year was a stretch as it is, but but i would just pull out at this point.

 

can cedeno bat leadoff?? my new focus would be juan pierre and milton bradley. if we can bring those two in without trading todd walker, we'd be in pretty good shape. i would keep todd walker, especially if furcal ends up in elsewhere.

 

if we add pierre and milton, id still consider this a sucessful season. i would slide either walker or milton into the 5th hole, which isnt ideal because neither has 5th hole power but both bring high OBP to the table.

 

OF pierre

OF bradley

1B lee

3B ramirez

2B walker

C barrett

OF murton

SS cedeno

 

that lineup is much more well rounded than the 05 cubs. good speed with pierre, high OBP with walker, bradley, and lee, and power with lee and aramis.

 

we could still use another quality starter like zito, but at this point im just asking for any type of impact trade at all.

Posted
I think LA is the last team he wants to go to, they'll have to significantly outbid us and Atlanta to get him. Right now, they're around 13 per. I think if Hendry increases to 11 per over 5 years, we'll be the more attractive team to him.

 

Reportedly, Furcal is torn, in part, because he likes the Dodgers 3 year offer. Specifically,the idea of 13MM per year and having the ability to be a FA in 3 years versus the stability of being locked in (at the same salary) for 5 years. I think the Cubs need to restructure their offer so that it includes a player option in year three. I also think they need to increase the money by a million or 1.5.

 

It's pretty funny how all that "i wanna play with my countrymen" and like my manager bs just went out the window when the money being offered jumped. if he decide on LA, I won't miss him one bit. If he stays with Atlanta, we probably missed out on a "good dude." :)

Posted
I think LA is the last team he wants to go to, they'll have to significantly outbid us and Atlanta to get him. Right now, they're around 13 per. I think if Hendry increases to 11 per over 5 years, we'll be the more attractive team to him.

 

Why do you think LA is the last team he wants to go to?

 

Their organization is in shambles and likely won't be in position to seriously compete, even in that weak division, for hte next three years. If you believe his agent (yeah, hard to do, I know), money isn't going to be the determining factor in where he signs. If he does sign with LA, then it's obvious that money is the number one factor of the signing. The organization is seriously behind our organization, even moreso Atlanta's. LA is a horrible city compared to either Atlanta or Chicago, don't think he'd be excited to live there vs the alternatives. Other than the money, what motivation could he possibly have to play in LA?

Posted

If...

 

...Furcal really does decide tomorrow...

 

...the Dodgers don't hire a manager between now and then...

 

...and he chooses a Dodger three-year offer...

 

...not only will it be a sad day for the Cubs, it will be a sad day for baseball.

 

A player will have turned down two teams/situations he reportedly feels very warmly toward to go to a team with no manager and an on-field product that is in disarray, to put it nicely. In the process, he will have turned down a larger total offer.

 

It will be a shame.

Posted
at this point id be tempted to pull out of the furcal race. anything more than 3-years/$40M is just insane. he's good, an anchor at the top of the order, but ponying up 6-years/$60M is just way too much for him.

 

i cant imagine hendry adding a 6th year. a 5th year was a stretch as it is, but but i would just pull out at this point.

 

can cedeno bat leadoff?? my new focus would be juan pierre and milton bradley. if we can bring those two in without trading todd walker, we'd be in pretty good shape. i would keep todd walker, especially if furcal ends up in elsewhere.

 

if we add pierre and milton, id still consider this a sucessful season. i would slide either walker or milton into the 5th hole, which isnt ideal because neither has 5th hole power but both bring high OBP to the table.

 

OF pierre

OF bradley

1B lee

3B ramirez

2B walker

C barrett

OF murton

SS cedeno

 

that lineup is much more well rounded than the 05 cubs. good speed with pierre, high OBP with walker, bradley, and lee, and power with lee and aramis.

 

we could still use another quality starter like zito, but at this point im just asking for any type of impact trade at all.

 

Pierre isn't a lock (lots of other teams are after him as well) and frankly, Furcal is a better leadoff man and defensive player. The Cubs have gone too far to take the offer off the table.

Posted
Don't worry guys, Neifi is working the phones as we type!

 

Neifi: "you're going to love Dusty. he'll never let some young punk take your spot."

 

Raffy: "no &%&$?!"

 

Neifi: "i could get caught with a dead hooker in the dugout and still start over Cedeno."

 

Raffy: "what about alcohol?"

 

Neifi: "dude. how do you think we handled losing 83 games last year?"

 

Raffy: "word."

Posted
The Cubs have gone too far to take the offer off the table.

 

Why do you say that?

 

I'm Furcal's agent:

 

Jim, hi. Great. And you? Fantastic. Say, listen Raffy and I were talking and he really likes the Cubs offer but the Dodgers are willing to go another 3 million per year. What do you have to say about that?

 

 

Jim, hello? Jim.

 

It's actually easy.

Posted
at this point id be tempted to pull out of the furcal race. anything more than 3-years/$40M is just insane. he's good, an anchor at the top of the order, but ponying up 6-years/$60M is just way too much for him.

 

i cant imagine hendry adding a 6th year. a 5th year was a stretch as it is, but but i would just pull out at this point.

 

can cedeno bat leadoff?? my new focus would be juan pierre and milton bradley. if we can bring those two in without trading todd walker, we'd be in pretty good shape. i would keep todd walker, especially if furcal ends up in elsewhere.

 

if we add pierre and milton, id still consider this a sucessful season. i would slide either walker or milton into the 5th hole, which isnt ideal because neither has 5th hole power but both bring high OBP to the table.

 

OF pierre

OF bradley

1B lee

3B ramirez

2B walker

C barrett

OF murton

SS cedeno

 

that lineup is much more well rounded than the 05 cubs. good speed with pierre, high OBP with walker, bradley, and lee, and power with lee and aramis.

 

we could still use another quality starter like zito, but at this point im just asking for any type of impact trade at all.

 

Pierre isn't a lock (lots of other teams are after him as well) and frankly, Furcal is a better leadoff man and defensive player. The Cubs have gone too far to take the offer off the table.

 

I HIGHLY doubt we have a legitimate shot to get Pierre. Supposedly, Florida wanted alot more from the NL teams than the AL teams in the Castillo deal. I think the Pierre deal will be handled in the same manner.

Posted
The Cubs have gone too far to take the offer off the table.

 

Why do you say that?

 

I'm Furcal's agent:

 

Jim, hi. Great. And you? Fantastic. Say, listen Raffy and I were talking and he really likes the Cubs offer but the Dodgers are willing to go another 3 million per year. What do you have to say about that?

 

 

Jim, hello? Jim.

 

It's actually easy.

 

Because that call could be a bluff. Hendry might decide not to increase his offer but there's no reason to take it off the table when in all actuality Furcal may want to come to the Cubs but is hoping to bleed a few extra million in the process.

Posted
at this point id be tempted to pull out of the furcal race. anything more than 3-years/$40M is just insane. he's good, an anchor at the top of the order, but ponying up 6-years/$60M is just way too much for him.

 

i cant imagine hendry adding a 6th year. a 5th year was a stretch as it is, but but i would just pull out at this point.

 

can cedeno bat leadoff?? my new focus would be juan pierre and milton bradley. if we can bring those two in without trading todd walker, we'd be in pretty good shape. i would keep todd walker, especially if furcal ends up in elsewhere.

 

if we add pierre and milton, id still consider this a sucessful season. i would slide either walker or milton into the 5th hole, which isnt ideal because neither has 5th hole power but both bring high OBP to the table.

 

OF pierre

OF bradley

1B lee

3B ramirez

2B walker

C barrett

OF murton

SS cedeno

 

that lineup is much more well rounded than the 05 cubs. good speed with pierre, high OBP with walker, bradley, and lee, and power with lee and aramis.

 

we could still use another quality starter like zito, but at this point im just asking for any type of impact trade at all.

 

Pierre isn't a lock (lots of other teams are after him as well) and frankly, Furcal is a better leadoff man and defensive player. The Cubs have gone too far to take the offer off the table.

 

I HIGHLY doubt we have a legitimate shot to get Pierre. Supposedly, Florida wanted alot more from the NL teams than the AL teams in the Castillo deal. I think the Pierre deal will be handled in the same manner.

 

Not to mention that Rotoworld is now reporting that the Marlins have asked the Yankees to give up Robinson Cano if they want Pierre. Just imagine what they would expect from the Cubs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...