Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

 

why are they interested in moving Kent to first?

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

 

They already had Konerko once, I don't think they'd go after him again.

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

 

I was close, I knew it was something to do with first. On a side note that could be the worst defensive half infield in the league.

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

 

Wow. The hole between 1st and 2nd would be massive with those two on the right side of the field. :shock:

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

They'll move kent to first, and Walker will play second. As for Konerko, I don't think the Dodgers would be interested.

 

I was close, I knew it was something to do with first. On a side note that could be the worst defensive half infield in the league.

 

Unless its hit right at Walker or Kent a gb to their side of infield has 50/50 chance of making it to RF.

Posted
Only concearn i have about all this is where does cedeno fit in?. behind perez at 2nd???. If he was going to be 1st choice 2B why has he played no winter ball there

 

I am sure dusty will just move furcal to 2nd and leave cedeno at ss then :wink: remeber neifi wasnt brought back to start. :(

Posted
FWIW, George Ofman just mentioned that the Cubs have some interest in Brad Wilkerson.

 

And my plan gets closer and closer to being a reality.

 

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Posted
LA is such a stupid team. They should shell out bucks and get themselves Konerko, or a proven first baseman, instead of praying Walker can field the position.

 

LA's owner sucks. He doesn't want to spend money whereas Anaheim has offered Konerko 5 and 60.

Posted
LA's not going to give up an asset for nothing in return. Am not a big Walker big, so decent deal. Wouldn't be surprised to see Soriano @ 2nd though.

 

But the Dodgers have to decide whether to offer Bradley arbitration. If they do, they might be on the hook for a salary that a) they don't want to pay and b) a contract they can't get rid of. The Cubs would be trading Walker to make the Dodgers' decision easier and to avoid competing for Bradley on the open market. That seems like a high price. But it fits with Hendry's seeming impatience to sign the two middle relievers.

Posted

Is it possible Hendry is aquiring Bradley for RF, and still plans on trading for Pierre?

 

SS-Furcal

CF-Pierre

1B-Lee

3B-Ramirez

RF-Bradley

LF-Murton

C-Barrett

2B-Cedeno/Perez

 

There have been a lot of rumors thrown out at some point for OF, with a couple of guys like Wilkerson and Bradley the ability to play 2 different spots. Hendry has a lot of options.

Posted

Is it possible Hendry is aquiring Bradley for RF, and still plans on trading for Pierre?

 

SS-Furcal

CF-Pierre

1B-Lee

3B-Ramirez

RF-Bradley

LF-Murton

C-Barrett

2B-Cedeno/Perez

 

There have been a lot of rumors thrown out at some point for OF, with a couple of guys like Wilkerson and Bradley the ability to play 2 different spots. Hendry has a lot of options.

Posted

I've posted a possible Walker for Bradley proposal a couple of times this offseason. In fact, this was my lineup for the 2006 Cubs, before we made any moves:

 

2B Castillo

CF Bradley

1B Lee

3B Ramirez

RF Giles

SS Garciaparra

LF Murton

C Barrett

 

I think he'd be a great acquistion.

Posted

Wasn't that a huge issue for Bradley though in LA, that he would only play CF?

He has a ton of talent but a little on the crazy side for me!

I'd rather see Pierre (and his rag arm) in CF this year!

Dream scenario:

Pierre

Furcal

Lee

Aram

Abreu

Walker or Cedeno

Barrett

Murton

Posted

Wasn't that a huge issue for Bradley though in LA, that he would only play CF?

He has a ton of talent but a little on the crazy side for me!

I'd rather see Pierre (and his rag arm) in CF this year!

Dream scenario:

Pierre

Furcal

Lee

Aram

Abreu

Walker or Cedeno

Barrett

Murton

Posted

Wasn't that a huge issue for Bradley though in LA, that he would only play CF?

He has a ton of talent but a little on the crazy side for me!

I'd rather see Pierre (and his rag arm) in CF this year!

Dream scenario:

Pierre

Furcal

Lee

Aram

Abreu

Walker or Cedeno

Barrett

Murton

Posted
I like the idea of Bradley. I think he will fit in good with the Cubs because of the personalities of the other players. Now, I have never met any of the current Cubs, but they seem like a laid back kind of group. In LA, Bradley and Kent didn't get along. Kent, however, had problems in SF with Bonds, and had the "truck washing" accident. What if the problems Bradley had were because Kent was a jerk? Again, I don't see anyone on the current Cubs who would be like that, but I could be wrong. Add this to the fact, our manager is suited for a guy like Bradley and I think it is a perfect fit for the Cubs.
Posted
I like the idea of Bradley. I think he will fit in good with the Cubs because of the personalities of the other players. Now, I have never met any of the current Cubs, but they seem like a laid back kind of group. In LA, Bradley and Kent didn't get along. Kent, however, had problems in SF with Bonds, and had the "truck washing" accident. What if the problems Bradley had were because Kent was a jerk? Again, I don't see anyone on the current Cubs who would be like that, but I could be wrong. Add this to the fact, our manager is suited for a guy like Bradley and I think it is a perfect fit for the Cubs.
Posted
I like the idea of Bradley. I think he will fit in good with the Cubs because of the personalities of the other players. Now, I have never met any of the current Cubs, but they seem like a laid back kind of group. In LA, Bradley and Kent didn't get along. Kent, however, had problems in SF with Bonds, and had the "truck washing" accident. What if the problems Bradley had were because Kent was a jerk? Again, I don't see anyone on the current Cubs who would be like that, but I could be wrong. Add this to the fact, our manager is suited for a guy like Bradley and I think it is a perfect fit for the Cubs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...