Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

According to two sources familiar with the negotiations, the Chicago Cubs have made a multi-year offer to the top free-agent reliever left on the board. However, they're not alone in the bidding.

Image courtesy of © Denis Poroy-Imagn Images

As we told you they would be last month, the Cubs are heavily involved on Tanner Scott, to the extent that they've made him an offer one source called "substantial"—meaningfully larger than the three-year, $43-million Craig Kimbrel deal that currently stands as the biggest investment the team has ever made in a reliever. At least one other team is around that level, too, though, and it's not clear how much further the Cubs are willing to go,

They're already positioning themselves to break their own mold when it comes to filling out the back end of a bullpen, but Jed Hoyer's front office never totally throws caution to the wind when operating in free agency. This will not be an exception. Scott isn't quite in a position to command the five-year deals (worth over $18 million per year) that Edwin Díaz and Josh Hader have recently pulled down, so the Cubs are trying to snag him, laying claim to a pitcher they regard as clearly superior to any other reliever available.

Scott, 30, has a 2.04 ERA and 34 saves in 150 innings of regular-season work since the start of 2023. Armed with a 97-MPH fastball and a viciously sharp slider, he has a 30.4% career strikeout rate, and that mark is 31.3% in the last two seasons. Opposing batters have hit just .186/.274/.254 against him in that span, as he minimizes hard contact nearly as well as he misses bats. He would become the best-projected Cubs closer to open a season since Wade Davis in 2017, and indeed, it's that kind of impact the team envisions getting from him over anywhere from three to five seasons.

He's a uniquely excellent fit for what the Cubs like to do on the pitching side, and for their roster, with its lefty-loaded rotation and right-leaning bullpen. Because the Marlins traded Scott to the Padres in July, he was not eligible to receive a qualifying offer when he became a free agent in November. That has augmented the Cubs' interest; they would not have been willing to give up a draft pick to sign him at the price to which they have already gone in this bidding.

A source said that, while there may end up being an opt-out in Scott's deal (depending on where he signs), that is not a major consideration in this particular case. Because he dodged the qualifying offer by being traded in the summer, Scott would be eligible for one if he exercised an opt-out clause, and the draft-pick forfeiture attached to players who receive a QO tends to put a damper on the market for relievers, as Kimbrel found out in 2018-19. MVP Sports Group, the agency founded and led by Dan Lozano, represents Scott and has worked out fruitful deals centered around options and flexible structures before, but it's believed that this deal will end up being fairly straightforward.

If the Cubs can't land Scott with this offer, they may pivot next to Kyle Finnegan, whose track record is much less dominant but whose stuff could play up to a similar level. They have some interest in Kirby Yates, Paul Sewald, and others, but Scott is their focus right now, and should he sign elsewhere, it's Finnegan with whom the fit seems to make the most sense.

Paying handsomely for a closer is not a novel idea for Hoyer, as he was quick to say when he appeared on the Spiegel & Holmes Show on 670 The Score Friday.

"We traded for Aroldis Chapman, we traded Jorge Soler for Wade Davis. We signed Brandon Morrow. We signed Craig Kimbrel," Hoyer said. "We don't not believe in the position ... I do think it has a lot of value."

This would be a larger stretch in that direction than the Cubs front office has made in many years, though, and under Hoyer, specifically, the team has leaned toward pursuing internal options and building a bullpen cheaply., Their willingness to go beyond their comfort zone with Scott reflects the way the structure of their roster has changed. With Pete Crow-Armstrong, Matt Shaw, Michael Busch, and Miguel Amaya penciled into the Opening Day lineup and high hopes for the contributions of young hurlers Javier Assad, Ben Brown, Cade Horton, Brandon Birdsell and Porter Hodge, the team has more financial flexibility with which to attack the bullpen.

On the other hand, in addition to their unwillingness to bid against much freer-spending teams (most notably the Dodgers) for a player at a position as volatile as relief pitcher, the Cubs feel a pressing need to keep some resources available to address their positional depth. Scott could be a capstone to their pitching staff, with the idea being that the depth of viable options in the rotation will make up for the lack of a true ace. Even if they reel him in, though, they need to do something to upgrade their bench. Thus. if forced to, they will let Scott sign elsewhere and focus on Finnegan, making a richer push for help on the infield to compensate for the less dominant pitching. 

In their ideal scenario, the Cubs will bring in the highest-profile free-agent reliever they've signed since either Kimbrel or Randy Myers, and do it within the next handful of days. They've made a push they consider aggressive, and Scott is likely to decide between a small handful of teams soon.


View full article

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, TomtheBombadil said:

Fun fact: I’ve been suggesting Scott to the org since 2016. Badass RP, great career going back to MiLB (just don’t look up a Scott/Burl Carraway comment I made in 2020 or just read the first part). So I’m pretty good at knowing the org’s “type” esp towards the top of the roster (which might be done anyway as we move further into a much noisier 2.0, but also stay healthy Thomas White and/or Sasaki) but also anytime I try to expect anyone (Ohtani, Sasaki these past two offseasons) its just not happening (which also might be moving towards being done bc part of going deeper into 2.0 is a stronger cap making it so that no one is Actually good enough for any team not getting the youngest, cheapest years similar to the NFL) 

AAAAAnyway in a world where everyone’s cool with SP featuring 9 TJs and conditioned to throw like 15 innings, (you know to avoid injury) going after such a stable and healthy pitcher regardless of role makes sense? Those 55-75+ innings from a performer like Scott (who also stayed strong into the playoffs - a conditioning thing than a makeup or clutch thing) have a ton of Value

This might be the most TomTheBombadil comment ever. Five parentheticals! FIVE! 😄 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

This would be a lot of fun.  I'm curious how much of this change in attitude towards paying a reliever like this is about team conditions vs. how much they really like Scott.

The bullpen would have a real chance to be dominant.  Hodge and Pearson don't have the track record you'd like, but there wasn't much that seemed fake about what they did down the stretch last year.  Sliding Scott ahead of them really gives you some margin for error.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Bertz said:

This would be a lot of fun.  I'm curious how much of this change in attitude towards paying a reliever like this is about team conditions vs. how much they really like Scott.

The bullpen would have a real chance to be dominant.  Hodge and Pearson don't have the track record you'd like, but there wasn't much that seemed fake about what they did down the stretch last year.  Sliding Scott ahead of them really gives you some margin for error.

He would be a great get. This would be a very un Cub like off season where they get two of the biggest fish in the off season pond. Typically it is low end guys (and they did do that too), and the mid level guys. They didn’t go mid level at all here. Maybe because mid level got more than they thought, (Severino, Buehler, Minter, Eovaldi). Still skeptical they can get this one done. But a little hopeful anyway. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

Scott trains at Tread (Tyler Zombro). Might also be a bit of a reason the Cubs are breaking their normal RP protocol here.

🤞

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...