Chicago Bears offseason

[jumbo]

I haven't found a decent future draft pick website.

 

But as far as I can tell the Bears have 2 2nd rounders in 2020, no 1st, 3rd or 4th, and then anywhere from 1 - 3 5ths. 1 - 2 6ths, and 1 7th.

And then 2021 is intact besides this conditional 7th.

 

https://www.prosportstransactions.com/football/DraftTrades/Future/Bears.htm

 

This one is good. I thought we had a compensatory 4th for Amos and a 5th for Callahan, too, but it looks like the CLinton-Dix signing negated that pick.

 

https://overthecap.com/compensatory-draft-picks-cancellation-chart/

 

So yeah, 2 (Oak), 2, 5Cond (Oak), 5, 5Comp, 5/6 (Phi), 6, 7, for 2020

[jersey cubs fan]

I haven't found a decent future draft pick website.

 

But as far as I can tell the Bears have 2 2nd rounders in 2020, no 1st, 3rd or 4th, and then anywhere from 1 - 3 5ths. 1 - 2 6ths, and 1 7th.

And then 2021 is intact besides this conditional 7th.

 

https://www.prosportstransactions.com/football/DraftTrades/Future/Bears.htm

 

This one is good. I thought we had a compensatory 4th for Amos and a 5th for Callahan, too, but it looks like the CLinton-Dix signing negated that pick.

 

That's the one I found but it's GD unreadable

[jumbo]

I haven't found a decent future draft pick website.

 

But as far as I can tell the Bears have 2 2nd rounders in 2020, no 1st, 3rd or 4th, and then anywhere from 1 - 3 5ths. 1 - 2 6ths, and 1 7th.

And then 2021 is intact besides this conditional 7th.

 

https://www.prosportstransactions.com/football/DraftTrades/Future/Bears.htm

 

This one is good. I thought we had a compensatory 4th for Amos and a 5th for Callahan, too, but it looks like the CLinton-Dix signing negated that pick.

 

That's the one I found but it's GD unreadable

 

 

Yeah, it could be better.

 

Just glancing at Oakland's schedule I see them winning maybe 5 games this season. A top 40 pick is near certain with their 2. That's high enough to get a first round caliber player. Their fifth would be like a fourth rounder using the same logic. Still start with 7 picks min. The Amos pick is a 4th rd comp, not 5th that i listed in the last post, so it's

 

2 OAK

2 CHI

4 COMP

5 OAK (conditional)

5 CHI

5/6 PHI

6 CHI

7 CHI

[Brian]

It's going to be glorious if that 2nd first rounder in the Mack trade ends up being actually a trade back of 5ish spots.

[We Got The Whole 9]

It's going to be glorious if that 2nd first rounder in the Mack trade ends up being actually a trade back of 5ish spots.

Pace doesn't really think like that. He'll probably try to get into the 1st or something.

[Named After Maddux]

It's going to be glorious if that 2nd first rounder in the Mack trade ends up being actually a trade back of 5ish spots.

Pace doesn't really think like that. He'll probably try to get into the 1st or something.

 

I think Brian was saying that it would be amazing if the Bears first rounder they gave up was something like pick #32 and the pick they receive from OAK was #37 or so. It wouldn’t be that we gave up two first round picks for Mack, just a first and move back a couple spots.

[jersey cubs fan]

It's going to be glorious if that 2nd first rounder in the Mack trade ends up being actually a trade back of 5ish spots.

Pace doesn't really think like that. He'll probably try to get into the 1st or something.

 

I think Brian was saying that it would be amazing if the Bears first rounder they gave up was something like pick #32 and the pick they receive from OAK was #37 or so. It wouldn’t be that we gave up two first round picks for Mack, just a first and move back a couple spots.

also that would mean they were super bowl champs

[WrigleyField 22]

Pace doesn't really think like that. He'll probably try to get into the 1st or something.

 

I think Brian was saying that it would be amazing if the Bears first rounder they gave up was something like pick #32 and the pick they receive from OAK was #37 or so. It wouldn’t be that we gave up two first round picks for Mack, just a first and move back a couple spots.

also that would mean they were super bowl champs

The Bears pick could be 32, but if that Oak pick is like 53, there's still gonna be some meatballs saying Pace lost that trade right?

[jersey cubs fan]

 

I think Brian was saying that it would be amazing if the Bears first rounder they gave up was something like pick #32 and the pick they receive from OAK was #37 or so. It wouldn’t be that we gave up two first round picks for Mack, just a first and move back a couple spots.

also that would mean they were super bowl champs

The Bears pick could be 32, but if that Oak pick is like 53, there's still gonna be some meatballs saying Pace lost that trade right?

That trade? No, I don't think so. I think most people are still hung up on the weird decision to trade up for Trubisky.

[We Got The Whole 9]

It's going to be glorious if that 2nd first rounder in the Mack trade ends up being actually a trade back of 5ish spots.

Pace doesn't really think like that. He'll probably try to get into the 1st or something.

 

I think Brian was saying that it would be amazing if the Bears first rounder they gave up was something like pick #32 and the pick they receive from OAK was #37 or so. It wouldn’t be that we gave up two first round picks for Mack, just a first and move back a couple spots.

Ah thank you for the clarification. For the record I hope he does trade back. There likely won't be a huge difference in the quality of the players available.

[raw]

My guess at the 53:

 

QB- Trubisky, Daniel (2)

RB- Cohen, Davis, Montgomery*, Whyte* (4)

TE- Burton, Shaheen, Braunecker, Raymond# (4)

WRx- Robinson, Wims (2)

WRz Gabriel, Ridley*, E. Hall# (3)

Slot- Miller, Patterson, M. Hall (3)

LT- Leno, Sowell (2)

LG- Daniels, Bars# (2)

C- Whitehair (1)

RG- Long, Larsen (2)

RT- Massie (1)

 

DE- Hicks, Bullard (2)

NT- Goldman (1)

DE- Nichols, RRH (2)

OLB- Mack, Irving (2)

ILB- Smith, Iyiegbuniwe (2)

ILB- Trevathan, Pierre-Louis (2)

OLB- Floyd, Lynch, Harris# (3)

CB- Fuller, Denmark* (3)

CB- Amukimara, Tolliver (2)

NB- Skrine, Shelley* (2)

SS- Clinton-Dix, Bush (2)

FS- Jackson, Houston-Carson (2)

 

P- O'Donnell (1)

LS- Scales (1)

K- Pineiro (1)

 

I cut Kwiatkoski, Coward, McManis, and Fitts as the "big" names. I think Kwit (along with Bullard) could be guys that get traded toward the end of camp. Probably need a DL to step up. But Bullard is expendable either way with 4 strong players ahead of him on the DL, he's also a FA after the year. Getting that conditional 7th back would be nice. Kwiatkoski is a 2 million dollar backup, who's also a FA after the year. The bears signed Kevin Pierre-Louis this week, who is a decent, possibly better special teams player who can backup ILB (though not as well). Maybe Kwit can be traded for someone at another more useful position.

[JeffH]

My guess at the 53:

 

QB- Trubisky, Daniel (2)

RB- Cohen, Davis, Montgomery*, Whyte* (4)

TE- Burton, Shaheen, Braunecker, Raymond# (4)

WRx- Robinson, Wims (2)

WRz Gabriel, Ridley*, E. Hall# (3)

Slot- Miller, Patterson, M. Hall (3)

LT- Leno, Sowell (2)

LG- Daniels, Bars# (2)

C- Whitehair (1)

RG- Long, Larsen (2)

RT- Massie (1)

 

DE- Hicks, Bullard (2)

NT- Goldman (1)

DE- Nichols, RRH (2)

OLB- Mack, Irving (2)

ILB- Smith, Iyiegbuniwe (2)

ILB- Trevathan, Pierre-Louis (2)

OLB- Floyd, Lynch, Harris# (3)

CB- Fuller, Denmark* (3)

CB- Amukimara, Tolliver (2)

NB- Skrine, Shelley* (2)

SS- Clinton-Dix, Bush (2)

FS- Jackson, Houston-Carson (2)

 

P- O'Donnell (1)

LS- Scales (1)

K- Pineiro (1)

 

I cut Kwiatkoski, Coward, McManis, and Fitts as the "big" names. I think Kwit (along with Bullard) could be guys that get traded toward the end of camp. Probably need a DL to step up. But Bullard is expendable either way with 4 strong players ahead of him on the DL, he's also a FA after the year. Getting that conditional 7th back would be nice. Kwiatkoski is a 2 million dollar backup, who's also a FA after the year. The bears signed Kevin Pierre-Louis this week, who is a decent, possibly better special teams player who can backup ILB (though not as well). Maybe Kwit can be traded for someone at another more useful position.

 

Unlikely that they carry eight wide receivers.

[raw]

My guess at the 53:

 

QB- Trubisky, Daniel (2)

RB- Cohen, Davis, Montgomery*, Whyte* (4)

TE- Burton, Shaheen, Braunecker, Raymond# (4)

WRx- Robinson, Wims (2)

WRz Gabriel, Ridley*, E. Hall# (3)

Slot- Miller, Patterson, M. Hall (3)

LT- Leno, Sowell (2)

LG- Daniels, Bars# (2)

C- Whitehair (1)

RG- Long, Larsen (2)

RT- Massie (1)

 

DE- Hicks, Bullard (2)

NT- Goldman (1)

DE- Nichols, RRH (2)

OLB- Mack, Irving (2)

ILB- Smith, Iyiegbuniwe (2)

ILB- Trevathan, Pierre-Louis (2)

OLB- Floyd, Lynch, Harris# (3)

CB- Fuller, Denmark* (3)

CB- Amukimara, Tolliver (2)

NB- Skrine, Shelley* (2)

SS- Clinton-Dix, Bush (2)

FS- Jackson, Houston-Carson (2)

 

P- O'Donnell (1)

LS- Scales (1)

K- Pineiro (1)

 

I cut Kwiatkoski, Coward, McManis, and Fitts as the "big" names. I think Kwit (along with Bullard) could be guys that get traded toward the end of camp. Probably need a DL to step up. But Bullard is expendable either way with 4 strong players ahead of him on the DL, he's also a FA after the year. Getting that conditional 7th back would be nice. Kwiatkoski is a 2 million dollar backup, who's also a FA after the year. The bears signed Kevin Pierre-Louis this week, who is a decent, possibly better special teams player who can backup ILB (though not as well). Maybe Kwit can be traded for someone at another more useful position.

 

Unlikely that they carry eight wide receivers.

 

They could. The Bears carried a lot of dead weight on the roster last year. Guys like Nick Williams, Rashaad Coward, and Marcus Williams never played last year and were wasted spots. They also carried guys like Mike Burton, Kush, and Kevin White, who didn't even factor on special teams for most of the season. Marvin Hall and Patterson have a lot of value on special teams. Hall has been a gunner before. Patterson obviously a returner. If not WRs, those spots will likely got to an extra DB, LB, DL or OL that won't likely see the field outside of special teams. Patterson and Hall provide ST value, plus guys that can get a handful of reps offensively each week.

[jersey cubs fan]

[WrigleyField 22]

Alright no April Fools shenanigans this time. The Bears throwback for this year probably leaked.

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/look-bears-unreleased-new-throwback-uniforms-for-2019-might-have-just-leaked-early/

 

I am a fan. Bonus points if they go with the funky helmet stripes too (I'm sure they'll have the horizontal striped socks)

[Brian]

Yep, I'm a fan.

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

[Brian]

[tweet]

[/tweet]

[WrigleyField 22]

Yep, I'm a fan.

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

Yea I kinda of really wanna go get one lol.

[Brian]

[David]

apparently this is what phil emery looks like now?

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

[Banedon]

I just came to post that....I thought it was a joke...wtf.

[jersey cubs fan]

apparently this is what phil emery looks like now?

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

 

I'm Phil Emery?

 

[Chocolate Milk]

apparently this is what phil emery looks like now?

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

That is actually...awesome.

[Brian]

I read Emery but pictured Angelo in my mind and that was even more shocking for a couple of seconds before I got my former Bears GMs straight.

[WrigleyField 22]

apparently this is what phil emery looks like now?

 

[tweet]

[/tweet]

That is actually...awesome.

I have an image in my head of the young area scouts talking about him.

 

"yea, they say he used to be an NFL GM and then went crazy after he was fired after 3 seasons"