Blackhawks Offseason

[sweetpeteman]

If we're getting younger on D, why not trade Seabs

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

[WrigleyField 22]

If we're getting younger on D, why not trade Seabs

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

Gonna have to throw in some picks.

[minnesotacubsfan]

If we're getting younger on D, why not trade Seabs

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

[jersey cubs fan]

If we're getting younger on D, why not trade Seabs

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

consensus is complete opposite of this statement

[Banedon]

If we're getting younger on D, why not trade Seabs

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

 

Actually, Pan/Saad is the better deal. We get a younger player that can play both directions with more guaranteed years, and we get a backup goalie.

[The_Achiever]

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

 

Actually, Pan/Saad is the better deal. We get a younger player that can play both directions with more guaranteed years, and we get a backup goalie.

 

Yeah I like this deal a lot more than the Hjammer one. Saad is a beast two-way player and I hope DeBrincat can fill in for Panarin adequately.

[UMFan83]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/BForanNHL/status/878317465196937217[/tweet]

[Banedon]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/BForanNHL/status/878317465196937217[/tweet]

 

A work buddy had been joking lately about going for Oshie. He says if this happens, he's buying a lottery ticket.

[Banedon]

Rumors of Kruger to Penguins for Hagelin. Maybe more players involved.

[jersey cubs fan]

Judging from the images turned up on a quick google search, Murphy will definitely play up to the gay male demographic.

[minnesotacubsfan]

 

 

Because nobody wants him or his horrendous contract.

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

 

Actually, Pan/Saad is the better deal. We get a younger player that can play both directions with more guaranteed years, and we get a backup goalie.

 

With Saad the better defensive player, our D like stays about the same with the drop off from Hammer to Murphy while gaining Saad over Pararin.

 

However, there is a bigger loss of offense when you go from Panarin to Saad with Hammer and Murphy being about the same.

 

We gain in years and salary, but I stand by what I'm saying

Edited June 23, 2017 by minnesotacubsfan

[minnesotacubsfan]

Dbl post

[Banedon]

 

I realize that, I'm lamenting

 

All in all, we lose on Pan/Saad and tread water on Hammer/Murphy

 

Actually, Pan/Saad is the better deal. We get a younger player that can play both directions with more guaranteed years, and we get a backup goalie.

 

With Saad the better defensive player, our D like stays about the same with the drop off from Hammer to Murphy while gaining Saad over Pararin.

 

However, there is a bigger loss of offense when you go from Panarin to Saad with Hammer and Murphy being about the same.

 

We gain in years and salary, but I stand by what I'm saying

 

1) You're still ignoring the other players involved in the deals.

 

2) When you get the playoffs, Panarin needs space to unleash the one-timers that he's so great at...and he won't have that space. Saad is going to be the better player in the playoffs, which what that Hawks need.

[minnesotacubsfan]

I am ignoring the other players as they are mostly roster fillers going in both directions

[raw]

Made Kane's line weaker to make Toews' line stronger. Of course, Kane would score with me out there, so I think I'm good with this. I never really got attached to Hjammer, so I'll give that other dude a chance.

[minnesotacubsfan]

Honestly I think Murphy could be every bit as good as Hammer

[Derwood]

Hopefully Saad refocuses with you guys, because the feeling here was that he took games off (i.e. he disappeared for stretches of games) and his numbers show it

[Brian707]

Man, I stay of the internets all day and no radio or tv and all hell breaks loose.

 

Without looking much into it at this point, I really like the Saad deal and am so so on the Hammer deal.

 

Oh and I can post this again:

[minnesotacubsfan]

Stealing

[Guest]

Judging from the images turned up on a quick google search, Murphy will definitely play up to the gay male demographic.

 

Good lord

[17 Seconds]

now that the shock is gone, i'm really excited to have saad back. we'll probably end up bringing sharp back too. he might kind of suck, but it will still be cool.

[jersey cubs fan]

now that the shock is gone, i'm really excited to have saad back. we'll probably end up bringing sharp back too. he might kind of suck, but it will still be cool.

I liked the Campbell idea because defensive depth seemed to be a legit concern and his skill set was supposed to match the needs, but a kind of sucky sharp seems rather pointless.

[17 Seconds]

he's coming back for chump change

[minnesotacubsfan]

he's coming back for chump change

 

who

[17 Seconds]

he's coming back for chump change

 

who