Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted (edited)
It's like minny somehow absorbed the souls of every fan that has ever called into the Boers and Bernstein show. Edited by UMFan83
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Heyward could hit one out in that environment

 

As much as I enjoyed his hard hit ball to the outfield last night, I'm more convinced he'd hit into some ground ball double plays, so he's out of the line up in those conditions. Besides, Zobrist has to play RF to get Schwarber into LF.

 

Unless they do something dumb and move Zobrist to 2B and sit Javy so they can get Schwarber in LF.

Posted (edited)
It's a shame the guy we're going against doesn't allow fly balls to be hit very far. Oh wait, that's not right.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search?hfPT=&hfZ=&hfGT=R%7C&hfPR=&hfAB=&stadium=&hfBBT=1%7C&hfBBL=&hfC=&season=2016&player_type=pitcher&hfOuts=&pitcher_throws=&batter_stands=&start_speed_gt=&start_speed_lt=&perceived_speed_gt=&perceived_speed_lt=&spin_rate_gt=&spin_rate_lt=&exit_velocity_gt=&exit_velocity_lt=&launch_angle_gt=&launch_angle_lt=&distance_gt=&distance_lt=&batted_ball_angle_gt=&batted_ball_angle_lt=&game_date_gt=&game_date_lt=&team=&position=&hfRO=&home_road=&hfInn=&min_pitches=2000&min_results=0&group_by=name&sort_col=bbdist&player_event_sort=start_speed&sort_order=desc&min_abs=0&xba_gt=&xba_lt=&px1=&px2=&pz1=&pz2=&ss_gt=&ss_lt=&is_barrel=#results

 

That's right. It's our pitcher who is good at that. It'd also be a shame if the guy on the other team has relied on getting flyouts on balls hit at least 300 feet -- you know, the kind that might fly out of the park instead in that kind of wind.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search?hfPT=&hfZ=&hfGT=R%7C&hfPR=&hfAB=12%7C&stadium=&hfBBT=&hfBBL=&hfC=&season=2016&player_type=pitcher&hfOuts=&pitcher_throws=&batter_stands=&start_speed_gt=&start_speed_lt=&perceived_speed_gt=&perceived_speed_lt=&spin_rate_gt=&spin_rate_lt=&exit_velocity_gt=&exit_velocity_lt=&launch_angle_gt=&launch_angle_lt=&distance_gt=300&distance_lt=&batted_ball_angle_gt=&batted_ball_angle_lt=&game_date_gt=&game_date_lt=&team=&position=&hfRO=&home_road=&hfInn=&min_pitches=2000&min_results=0&group_by=name&sort_col=pitch_percent&player_event_sort=start_speed&sort_order=desc&min_abs=0&xba_gt=&xba_lt=&px1=&px2=&pz1=&pz2=&ss_gt=&ss_lt=&is_barrel=#results

 

Oh, he's gotten a ton of outs that way. And our guy hasn't needed them.

 

does any of this matter in 40 mph wins? i mean, its not 10, or 20. its 40. I hope so, but but holy horsefeathers

 

Ground balls aren't affected by the wind. You have one of the better ground ball pitchers in the league going who also happens to be the best at inducing weak contact. He might give up a gopher ball or even 2 but I would guess that for the most part Hendricks is the ideal pitcher to have pitching in these conditions.

 

Is my theory on Hendricks correct?

He's 21st overall in GB rate, 23rd in GB/FB (amongst qualified pitchers). Obviously good. Where he really shines is HR/FB rate, which is top 3. The link Duke posted is encouraging, his FBs just aren't going as far it seems. If that's a sustainable thing, you're in good hands regardless of wind, I'd think.

Edited by WrigleyField 22
Posted
It's a shame the guy we're going against doesn't allow fly balls to be hit very far. Oh wait, that's not right.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search?hfPT=&hfZ=&hfGT=R%7C&hfPR=&hfAB=&stadium=&hfBBT=1%7C&hfBBL=&hfC=&season=2016&player_type=pitcher&hfOuts=&pitcher_throws=&batter_stands=&start_speed_gt=&start_speed_lt=&perceived_speed_gt=&perceived_speed_lt=&spin_rate_gt=&spin_rate_lt=&exit_velocity_gt=&exit_velocity_lt=&launch_angle_gt=&launch_angle_lt=&distance_gt=&distance_lt=&batted_ball_angle_gt=&batted_ball_angle_lt=&game_date_gt=&game_date_lt=&team=&position=&hfRO=&home_road=&hfInn=&min_pitches=2000&min_results=0&group_by=name&sort_col=bbdist&player_event_sort=start_speed&sort_order=desc&min_abs=0&xba_gt=&xba_lt=&px1=&px2=&pz1=&pz2=&ss_gt=&ss_lt=&is_barrel=#results

 

That's right. It's our pitcher who is good at that. It'd also be a shame if the guy on the other team has relied on getting flyouts on balls hit at least 300 feet -- you know, the kind that might fly out of the park instead in that kind of wind.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/statcast_search?hfPT=&hfZ=&hfGT=R%7C&hfPR=&hfAB=12%7C&stadium=&hfBBT=&hfBBL=&hfC=&season=2016&player_type=pitcher&hfOuts=&pitcher_throws=&batter_stands=&start_speed_gt=&start_speed_lt=&perceived_speed_gt=&perceived_speed_lt=&spin_rate_gt=&spin_rate_lt=&exit_velocity_gt=&exit_velocity_lt=&launch_angle_gt=&launch_angle_lt=&distance_gt=300&distance_lt=&batted_ball_angle_gt=&batted_ball_angle_lt=&game_date_gt=&game_date_lt=&team=&position=&hfRO=&home_road=&hfInn=&min_pitches=2000&min_results=0&group_by=name&sort_col=pitch_percent&player_event_sort=start_speed&sort_order=desc&min_abs=0&xba_gt=&xba_lt=&px1=&px2=&pz1=&pz2=&ss_gt=&ss_lt=&is_barrel=#results

 

Oh, he's gotten a ton of outs that way. And our guy hasn't needed them.

 

does any of this matter in 40 mph wins? i mean, its not 10, or 20. its 40. I hope so, but but holy horsefeathers

 

Ground balls aren't affected by the wind. You have one of the better ground ball pitchers in the league going who also happens to be the best at inducing weak contact. He might give up a gopher ball or even 2 but I would guess that for the most part Hendricks is the ideal pitcher to have pitching in these conditions.

 

Is my theory on Hendricks correct?

 

I would say, unequivocally, so.

 

We can break this down even more as to why it favors Hendricks. For one, Hendricks is a really good pitcher and gets a lot of ground balls, like you say. But we've also seen a bunch of articles -- and witnessed it ourselves -- talking about how diverse his arsenal is. He keeps guys off-balance. He's got a ton of useful pitches that he can use at any moment. I've shown he's good at getting weak contact in the air and on the ground. But, there was one article that showed that he becomes much better when men are on, and that it is because he changes how he pitches. He looks for weak contact when nobody's on and then he brings out the changeup to get whiffs when there is trouble. And we've seen times where he gets a lot of weak fly outs and pop-ups in a game, and then the next outing he gets a ton of ground balls. I think a lot of that has to do with game plans, based off of opponents and conditions.

 

Basically, Hendricks can do whatever he wants to get guys out. And he decides what to do based on circumstances. In this circumstance, he'll know fly balls are bad. So he'll probably look to get more whiffs and keep the ball on the ground as much as possible. That means he'll attack low, with a heavy diet of sinkers. And he'll bring out the change more often when he gets to two strikes, even when guys aren't on.

 

Tomlin, on the other hand, doesn't have much of repertoire. He pretty much survives solely because he doesn't walk guys. After that, he just prays that he gets more 325-foot fly outs than 400-foot homers. He has no hope in this endeavor. He can't miss bats like Hendricks. He can't get ground balls like Hendricks. All he can do is pray. And that's not going to work.

Posted
It's like minny somehow absorbed the souls of every fan that has ever called into the Boers and Bernstein show.

 

neeeeever listened to them. I've been at war at work + my natural tendency to be paranoid = this

Posted
Goes both ways

 

What is this in reference to?

 

 

the wind

 

With the amount of words posted on that subject in this thread I think "goes both ways" is a post that could use a bit of added information.

Posted
As much as the wind would seem to benefit us in this game, I'd prefer no wind. I always want as few variables as possible in games where we have an advantage (which I know is almost all of them, but still).
Posted
As much as the wind would seem to benefit us in this game, I'd prefer no wind. I always want as few variables as possible in games where we have an advantage (which I know is almost all of them, but still).

 

Well sure, but this isn't a situation where we get to choose. It is what it is.

Posted
As much as the wind would seem to benefit us in this game, I'd prefer no wind. I always want as few variables as possible in games where we have an advantage (which I know is almost all of them, but still).

 

Well sure, but this isn't a situation where we get to choose. It is what it is.

 

I understand this concept.

Posted

 

I'm saying crazy horsefeathers now?

 

lets not forget the hr hitters Cleveland does have. this isnt a team full of Jose Macias clones

 

Beware Roberto Perez.

Posted

 

I'm saying crazy horsefeathers now?

 

lets not forget the hr hitters Cleveland does have. this isnt a team full of Jose Macias clones

 

OK? The Cubs have the better starting pitcher and a better lineup for slugging and they're at home. It's not a lock, but a windy game is in their favor.

Posted

 

I'm saying crazy horsefeathers now?

 

lets not forget the hr hitters Cleveland does have. this isnt a team full of Jose Macias clones

 

Beware Roberto Perez.

 

Napoli. Ramirez. Santana. Lindor. I mean, not to be a dick or anything

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...