Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Do you expect Javier Baez to be traded?  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you expect Javier Baez to be traded?

    • Yes (Before Opening Day)
      4
    • Yes (After Opening Day)
      4
    • No
      30


Posted

Pretty simple question here. Do you believe Javy Baez will be dealt before the start of the regular season, during the season itself, or stay on Chicago's 25 man roster the entire year.

 

Also how many at bats do you project Baez to receive, as well as his slash line. I'm predicting either inconsistency from Hendricks or Hammel struggling will lead to Baez being packaged along with McKinney or Almora, during the regular season, for a Starting Pitcher. And unless someone in the starting lineup gets hurt or underachieves I don't see Baez getting that many at bats, which will lead to a tolerable, but not ideal, slash line of 260/290/410.

 

After being dealt mid season to a team in clear cut rebuild mode, I think being given consistent playing time will lead to a better slash line of 270/300/430.

Recommended Posts

Posted

With Castro being dealt to NYY, I think it's a safe bet that Javy is a Cub for all of 2016. What other options do we have at SS if Russell tweaks his hammy?

 

With the Cubs loading up on relievers, I think it's possible we see an 8 man pen, and only 12 position players. We know Ross takes one of the bench spots, and it may only allow for two additional bench players. Javy can play SS, 2B, and 3B, any maybe the OF. His versatility & ability to play several positions keeps him a Cub for 2016, IMO

Posted
With Castro being dealt to NYY, I think it's a safe bet that Javy is a Cub for all of 2016. What other options do we have at SS if Russell tweaks his hammy?

 

With the Cubs loading up on relievers, I think it's possible we see an 8 man pen, and only 12 position players. We know Ross takes one of the bench spots, and it may only allow for two additional bench players. Javy can play SS, 2B, and 3B, any maybe the OF. His versatility & ability to play several positions keeps him a Cub for 2016, IMO

 

The offensive expectations for Russell for 2016 really aren't that high. If worse came to worse and Russell suffered a nagging injury a defensive minded shortstop could always be acquired, slotted into the nine hole, and the offensive downgrade likely wouldn't be enough to take down the potency of the lineup.

 

But when you look at the rotation two pitchers are on the wrong side of 30, one blew by his single season innings total in 2015, and another two years in a row has fallen apart in the second half, I see the likelihood for the need to acquire another starting pitcher near the deadline to be rather high.

Posted
What if Tampa offered Jake O and Kiermaier for Javy and Soler? Do you do that deal?

So fast before Tampa can try and take the offer off of the table.

Posted (edited)
What if Tampa offered Jake O and Kiermaier for Javy and Soler? Do you do that deal?

So fast before Tampa can try and take the offer off of the table.

 

My love of dong heavy offense disagrees with that, though I acknowledge Kiermaier's presence as the best defensive CF'er in baseball and how valuable that would be allowing Heyward to stay in RF where he is the best defensive RF in baseball.

 

With how defensive metrics aren't particularly exact, I wonder how much of Kiermaiers WAR value is skewed from flawed metrics?

 

He was a 7.3 rWAR and 5.5 fWAR player last year. And it was pretty much all defensive value. Is it worth having a light hitting ultra elite defensive outfielder over an average fielding and above average hitting outfielder?

 

EDIT: He was 7.3 rWAR, not 7.7

Edited by The Logan
Posted
What if Tampa offered Jake O and Kiermaier for Javy and Soler? Do you do that deal?

So fast before Tampa can try and take the offer off of the table.

 

My love of dong heavy offense disagrees with that, though I acknowledge Kiermaier's presence as the best defensive CF'er in baseball and how valuable that would be allowing Heyward to stay in RF where he is the best defensive RF in baseball.

 

With how defensive metrics aren't particularly exact, I wonder how much of Kiermaiers WAR value is skewed from flawed metrics?

 

He was a 7.7 rWAR and 5.5 fWAR player last year. And it was pretty much all defensive value. Is it worth having a light hitting ultra elite defensive outfielder over an average fielding and above average hitting outfielder?

And...How much does 81 games at Wrigley factor into the answer?

Posted
Somewhere like Coors or Petco I could see that as a reasonable approach, but as small as Wrigley is, I don't think that's the way to go.
Posted

Javy is too valuable to us as a utility guy/backup this year. We need him more than we need to use him in a deal for a SP. We can win a WS with this team as it currently is, and if by mid season Theo wants to upgrade the rotation or CF I think he'll be able to accomplish it without using Javy.

 

I mean, we all know Javy's warts, so does every other GM out there. There may some teams that dont want him and would prefer a grouping from the likes of Torres/Jiminez/McKinney/Happ/Almora, etc

Posted
yeah, i guess you'd have to take Kiermaier but damn it it'd go against every fiber of my being. i want maximum dongs.
Posted
What if Tampa offered Jake O and Kiermaier for Javy and Soler? Do you do that deal?

So fast before Tampa can try and take the offer off of the table.

 

My love of dong heavy offense disagrees with that, though I acknowledge Kiermaier's presence as the best defensive CF'er in baseball and how valuable that would be allowing Heyward to stay in RF where he is the best defensive RF in baseball.

 

With how defensive metrics aren't particularly exact, I wonder how much of Kiermaiers WAR value is skewed from flawed metrics?

 

He was a 7.3 rWAR and 5.5 fWAR player last year. And it was pretty much all defensive value. Is it worth having a light hitting ultra elite defensive outfielder over an average fielding and above average hitting outfielder?

 

EDIT: He was 7.3 rWAR, not 7.7

he had crazy statcast readings; (going off memory) he led baseball in OF throws over 100 MPH and had something like the 3rd fastest average max speed, right up there with some absolute burners who you'd expect in such lists

 

i don't mean to argue that i wholeheartedly agree he's worth 3 wins or whatever from catching baseballs, but between his incredible physical tools and reading a (great) piece like this that illustrates his dedication and talent you get the idea he's indisputably very valuable

 

all that being said, he's probably a bad fit for Wrigley imo

Posted

While I understand the appeal in Baez off the bench, I think the upside isn't as high as people think. Lets say Addison Russell's tweaks his hamstring in early May, requiring a DL stint, giving Baez the Shortstop job. The idea of a 23 year old extremely aggressive hitter excelling in a starting role, after being on the bench for an extended period of time, is fairly unrealistic in my mind.

 

Plus there's there's the mental makeup of Baez to consider. How will a 23 year old with incredible physical tools, who has excelled in the Minors, react to sporadic playing time? Will he pout? Will he be able to get into a rhythm while only hitting once per game?

 

I could easily see Baez not adjusting well to a part time role. This would hurt not only his stats, but his trade value, should a Starting Pitcher be needed come July.

Posted
While I understand the appeal in Baez off the bench, I think the upside isn't as high as people think. Lets say Addison Russell's tweaks his hamstring in early May, requiring a DL stint, giving Baez the Shortstop job. The idea of a 23 year old extremely aggressive hitter excelling in a starting role, after being on the bench for an extended period of time, is fairly unrealistic in my mind.

 

Plus there's there's the mental makeup of Baez to consider. How will a 23 year old with incredible physical tools, who has excelled in the Minors, react to sporadic playing time? Will he pout? Will he be able to get into a rhythm while only hitting once per game?

 

I could easily see Baez not adjusting well to a part time role. This would hurt not only his stats, but his trade value, should a Starting Pitcher be needed come July.

 

While you could argue that Baez's stats only looked decent because of BABIP, he seemed to react fine to sporadic playing time in September and in the playoffs last year.

Posted

I don't see sporadic playing time. He'!l get into most every game as a PH/defensive replacement that he isn't already starting in. And he'll start a ton too. With the versatility we've got, he'll be starting plenty while Soler/Schwarber/Zobrist/Russell get days off. Not to mention, he becomes a full time player if anyone goes on the DL.

 

My prediction is 477 AB's with a .261/.300/.454 line. 16 HR with a 31.1% K rate.

Posted
I don't see sporadic playing time. He'!l get into most every game as a PH/defensive replacement that he isn't already starting in. And he'll start a ton too. With the versatility we've got, he'll be starting plenty while Soler/Schwarber/Zobrist/Russell get days off. Not to mention, he becomes a full time player if anyone goes on the DL.

 

My prediction is 477 AB's with a .261/.300/.454 line. 16 HR with a 31.1% K rate.

 

I still don't see that many AB's unless someone is seriously injured. A PH usually gets 1 AB, while a defensive replacement may not get any. I still question how often Baez will start in the OF and I don't believe Joe is going to bench Zobrist too often in favor of Baez.

Posted
Not the point. Zobrist doesn't HAVE to play 2B. He can play LF/RF with Javy taking 2B on days Soler or Schwarber are rested. There'll be plenty of AB's for Javy, as long as he can handle them.
Posted

I don't think lack of AB's will be a huge issue. With the way the roster is currently constructed, he'll probably essentially be platooning with Schwarber. Also with Zobrist's age/knee issues and Russell's hammy history, he'll see time in those spots as well.

 

As far as predictions go, I lean more toward Kyle on this one. I just think MLB pitchers will eat him alive until we can't afford to carry him on the roster anymore. I obviously hope I'm wrong. The dude is super fun to watch with that ridiculous swing and his flashiness on defense (I still think his overall ability on defense is overrated). But I just don't think that approach is good enough to sustain any real success.

 

I like Adam Warren and I expect Zobrist to be really solid for at least a few years, so I'm not upset by that trade, but I expect Starlin to outperform Javy by a lot in 2016.

Posted
I like the Steamer projection: .252/.302/.457 across 335 PA
Posted
Not the point. Zobrist doesn't HAVE to play 2B. He can play LF/RF with Javy taking 2B on days Soler or Schwarber are rested. There'll be plenty of AB's for Javy, as long as he can handle them.

I've gotta think that Coghlan will be soaking up a good portion of the Soler/Schwarber off days, though

Posted
Not the point. Zobrist doesn't HAVE to play 2B. He can play LF/RF with Javy taking 2B on days Soler or Schwarber are rested. There'll be plenty of AB's for Javy, as long as he can handle them.

I've gotta think that Coghlan will be soaking up a good portion of the Soler/Schwarber off days, though

 

I would agree, but I think he'll be dealt before Opening Day, likely for bullpen help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...