Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
The NL since '98 has hit more HR's than the AL 13 times.

 

The NL had two more teams for most of that time. NL teams averaged more HRs than AL teams three times in that period. In 2001, 2007, 2008.

 

http://media.giphy.com/media/13py6c5BSnBkic/giphy.gif

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest
Guests
Posted
The NL since '98 has hit more HR's than the AL 13 times.

 

The NL had two more teams for most of that time. NL teams averaged more HRs than AL teams three times in that period. In 2001, 2007, 2008.

Nice - I knew goony's Bonds/Sosa reasoning wasn't enough to add up.

Posted
The NL since '98 has hit more HR's than the AL 13 times.

 

The NL had two more teams for most of that time. NL teams averaged more HRs than AL teams three times in that period. In 2001, 2007, 2008.

Nice - I knew goony's Bonds/Sosa reasoning wasn't enough to add up.

 

well, that wasn't really my reasoning as much as just the first thing I thought of when that note was made. My question was about SLG.

 

Every time I have looked it seems to me the AL has had a ~10 point advantage in SLG.

Guest
Guests
Posted
The NL since '98 has hit more HR's than the AL 13 times.

 

The NL had two more teams for most of that time. NL teams averaged more HRs than AL teams three times in that period. In 2001, 2007, 2008.

Nice - I knew goony's Bonds/Sosa reasoning wasn't enough to add up.

 

well, that wasn't really my reasoning as much as just the first thing I thought of when that note was made. My question was about SLG.

 

Every time I have looked it seems to me the AL has had a ~10 point advantage in SLG.

No, I know it wasn't you're defense or anything but rather your attempt to explain away the faulty reasoning, but it still fell short of being the nail in the coffin dismissal.

Guest
Guests
Posted
How much solidarity is there in the union about adding the DH? I would think NL pitchers would oppose it

Why, cuz they'll face one better batter?

Guest
Guests
Posted
How much solidarity is there in the union about adding the DH? I would think NL pitchers would oppose it

A lot.

Posted

There's no such thing as an "NL Pitcher."

 

"Man, there is NO WAY I will ever ever ever pitch in the AL; it's a lock that I will be pitching forever in the league I'm pitching in right now."

Posted
There's no such thing as an "NL Pitcher."

 

"Man, there is NO WAY I will ever ever ever pitch in the AL; it's a lock that I will be pitching forever in the league I'm pitching in right now."

 

His point might have been that some pitchers prefer pitching in the NL b/c they actually want to hit.

Posted
There's no such thing as an "NL Pitcher."

 

"Man, there is NO WAY I will ever ever ever pitch in the AL; it's a lock that I will be pitching forever in the league I'm pitching in right now."

 

His point might have been that some pitchers prefer pitching in the NL b/c they actually want to hit.

Or they prefer pitching in the NL because they prefer to face 8 hitters instead of 9.

Posted
There's no such thing as an "NL Pitcher."

 

"Man, there is NO WAY I will ever ever ever pitch in the AL; it's a lock that I will be pitching forever in the league I'm pitching in right now."

 

His point might have been that some pitchers prefer pitching in the NL b/c they actually want to hit.

 

Yes, I know;I sincerely doubt there are many MLB pitchers that are going to turn down better deals to pitch in the AL, regardless of what they prefer. Guys that go out of their way to actually do that over the course of their careers are likely very scattered outliers.

 

So, no, it's not likely going to be a union issue because of "NL pitchers."

Posted
i still think the dh should only take the at-bats of the starting pitcher, if only because it might cause maddon to leave electric ladyland in for greater than 80 pitches a game
Old-Timey Member
Posted
i still think the dh should only take the at-bats of the starting pitcher, if only because it might cause maddon to leave electric ladyland in for greater than 80 pitches a game

If the DH must be part of the game, this is an interesting compromise idea, though I doubt it would be enacted.

Posted

The DH is usually hitting in place of the pitcher, but not always.

 

Besides, let's say the player they're hitting in place off goes down with an injury in the second; they're supposed to now put in a pinch-hitter instead? If they're hitting for the pitcher, do they have to change the DH every time the pitcher changes?

Posted
The DH is usually hitting in place of the pitcher, but not always.

 

Besides, let's say the player they're hitting in place off goes down with an injury in the second; they're supposed to now put in a pinch-hitter instead? If they're hitting for the pitcher, do they have to change the DH every time the pitcher changes?

 

The DH has to be for the pitcher.

Posted

D'oh, that's right.

 

Can the pitcher be the DH?

 

But sticking with the rest, it seems kind of goofy to have to pinch hit for the DH if the starting pitcher exits the game early.

Posted
D'oh, that's right.

 

Can the pitcher be the DH?

 

But sticking with the rest, it seems kind of goofy to have to pinch hit for the DH if the starting pitcher exits the game early.

You don't have to pinch hit for the DH if you move him to a position.

Posted
half the posts in this thread are yours, including dropping the mic for a comment you didn't make, and you don't even know that the dh can only be for the pitcher?

 

Man, if you're thinking I know everything then prepare to be disappointed. A LOT.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
If Soler strained his hammy running out that double, I think that would be an iron-clad case for instituting the designated runner.
Posted
Plus it's not like teams wouldn't still have the option to use a rare freak like Zambrano who both wants to hit and can hit.

 

That strikes me as very unlikely. The NL DH is tantamount to the end of pitchers distinguishing themselves with the bat.

Posted
Plus it's not like teams wouldn't still have the option to use a rare freak like Zambrano who both wants to hit and can hit.

 

That strikes me as very unlikely. The NL DH is tantamount to the end of pitchers distinguishing themselves with the bat.

 

That's not much of a loss.

Posted
Plus it's not like teams wouldn't still have the option to use a rare freak like Zambrano who both wants to hit and can hit.

 

That strikes me as very unlikely. The NL DH is tantamount to the end of pitchers distinguishing themselves with the bat.

 

That's not much of a loss.

 

It's not surprising that you think so, but I think it contributed a lot to making Zambrano fun as a player.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...