Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
i would rather do this:

 

1. Schwarber - CF

2. Schwarber - SS

3. Schwarber - 1b

4. Schwarber - LF

5. Schwarber - C

6. Schwarber - 3b

7. Schwarber - RF

8. Schwarber - 2b

 

Schwarber

Schwarber

Schwarber

Schwarber

Schwarber /Schwarber

 

With cloning technology, it can happen.

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Is Schwarber better than Bryant? Not sayin' just sayin'...
.... I know I shouldn't read too much into these stats at low levels for a college bat who just finished his college season, buuut, those are some pretty good stats …..

 

Schwarber is 13 months older than Almora. Funny how Schwarber is perceived as so old that whatever good he does is to be expected and nothing to be excited about; while Almora is considered to be so young that whatever struggles he has are only to be expected and nothing to be worried about.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Bryant starting 2015 with the Cubs. Why won't it happen and who can I direct my rage at?

 

The CBA.

Posted
Is Schwarber better than Bryant? Not sayin' just sayin'...
.... I know I shouldn't read too much into these stats at low levels for a college bat who just finished his college season, buuut, those are some pretty good stats …..

 

Schwarber is 13 months older than Almora. Funny how Schwarber is perceived as so old that whatever good he does is to be expected and nothing to be excited about; while Almora is considered to be so young that whatever struggles he has are only to be expected and nothing to be worried about.

 

While I agree that what Schwarber is doing is ridiculous and deserves massive credit, I disagree with this exact analogy. Schwarber is a year older and a level under. Being 20 and struggling in High A (not to mention he's showing signs of life) is fairly common. If he were a year older struggling, I'd be worried. As it is, I'm honestly not.

Posted
So Keith Law, can I be excited about Schwarber yet?

 

Jason Parks says no. A 1.700 OPS is pretty typical for a college bat in A ball.

https://twitter.com/professorparks/status/483072074932424704

I'm new to twitter. And when I mean new I mean I created some stupid profile 2 weeks ago. But I tweeted for the first time tonight and that tweet was to Jason Parks relaying this same info.

 

He re-tweeted (Daniel Wiseman, wisemand21) and I'm not sure if he's admitting his error or mocking me or what...

Posted
So Keith Law, can I be excited about Schwarber yet?

 

Jason Parks says no. A 1.700 OPS is pretty typical for a college bat in A ball.

https://twitter.com/professorparks/status/483072074932424704

I'm new to twitter. And when I mean new I mean I created some stupid profile 2 weeks ago. But I tweeted for the first time tonight and that tweet was to Jason Parks relaying this same info.

 

He re-tweeted (Daniel Wiseman, wisemand21) and I'm not sure if he's admitting his error or mocking me or what...

 

Unfortunately, he's mocking you. Because evidently all college guys do this and we're stupid for not knowing it.

Posted
While I agree that what Schwarber is doing is ridiculous and deserves massive credit, I disagree with this exact analogy. Schwarber is a year older and a level under. Being 20 and struggling in High A (not to mention he's showing signs of life) is fairly common. If he were a year older struggling, I'd be worried. As it is, I'm honestly not.

 

"fairly common" isn't a word I want attached to our recent No. 6 overall pick. Being not good enough for the majors is fairly common. It's kinda important that out best prospects be fairly uncommon.

Posted
So Keith Law, can I be excited about Schwarber yet?

 

Jason Parks says no. A 1.700 OPS is pretty typical for a college bat in A ball.

https://twitter.com/professorparks/status/483072074932424704

I'm new to twitter. And when I mean new I mean I created some stupid profile 2 weeks ago. But I tweeted for the first time tonight and that tweet was to Jason Parks relaying this same info.

 

He re-tweeted (Daniel Wiseman, wisemand21) and I'm not sure if he's admitting his error or mocking me or what...

 

Unfortunately, he's mocking you. Because evidently all college guys do this and we're stupid for not knowing it.

my reply

ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 Maybe you haven't looked at his stats all that closely. I know you're used to doing that in the offseason.
Posted
While I agree that what Schwarber is doing is ridiculous and deserves massive credit, I disagree with this exact analogy. Schwarber is a year older and a level under. Being 20 and struggling in High A (not to mention he's showing signs of life) is fairly common. If he were a year older struggling, I'd be worried. As it is, I'm honestly not.

 

"fairly common" isn't a word I want attached to our recent No. 6 overall pick. Being not good enough for the majors is fairly common. It's kinda important that out best prospects be fairly uncommon.

 

Won't argue I certainly expected more at this point in the season, but he's certainly got time to turn it around and is showing signs of doing it.

Posted
So Keith Law, can I be excited about Schwarber yet?

 

Jason Parks says no. A 1.700 OPS is pretty typical for a college bat in A ball.

https://twitter.com/professorparks/status/483072074932424704

I'm new to twitter. And when I mean new I mean I created some stupid profile 2 weeks ago. But I tweeted for the first time tonight and that tweet was to Jason Parks relaying this same info.

 

He re-tweeted (Daniel Wiseman, wisemand21) and I'm not sure if he's admitting his error or mocking me or what...

 

Unfortunately, he's mocking you. Because evidently all college guys do this and we're stupid for not knowing it.

my reply

ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 Maybe you haven't looked at his stats all that closely. I know you're used to doing that in the offseason.

 

Perfect.

Posted

Daniel Wiseman ‏@DanielWiseman21 36m

@ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 Maybe you haven't looked at his stats all that closely. I know you're used to doing that in the offseason.

Details Reply Delete Favorite More

 

 

Jason Parks ‏@ProfessorParks 31m

@DanielWiseman21 @SteveJB54 Good try

Details Reply Retweet Favorite More

 

 

Daniel Wiseman ‏@DanielWiseman21 20m

@ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 (what every minor league pitcher tells themselves after facing the Schwarbs)

Details Reply Delete Favorite More

 

 

Daniel Wiseman ‏@DanielWiseman21 15m

@ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 If ONLY I wasn't an "advanced college bat" Kyle tells himself while trying to sleep. Maybe then I'd be a prospect

Guest
Guests
Posted
So Keith Law, can I be excited about Schwarber yet?

 

Jason Parks says no. A 1.700 OPS is pretty typical for a college bat in A ball.

https://twitter.com/professorparks/status/483072074932424704

I'm new to twitter. And when I mean new I mean I created some stupid profile 2 weeks ago. But I tweeted for the first time tonight and that tweet was to Jason Parks relaying this same info.

 

He re-tweeted (Daniel Wiseman, wisemand21) and I'm not sure if he's admitting his error or mocking me or what...

 

Unfortunately, he's mocking you. Because evidently all college guys do this and we're stupid for not knowing it.

my reply

ProfessorParks @SteveJB54 Maybe you haven't looked at his stats all that closely. I know you're used to doing that in the offseason.

Then he'll block you when you out snark him.

Guest
Guests
Posted

Is Sulley Rob Stark @kinginthenorth? Lol.

 

Also I take back whatever I said about him. He can play wherever he wants.

Posted

Parks loves me (or hates me). He retweeted my "if only i wasn't an advanced college bat" tweet. I now have more re-tweets than tweets.

 

I think I am going to love [expletive] with people on twitter.

Guest
Guests
Posted
It's ok because parks said he's a legit prospect. Like he has to be differentiated from Wes Darvill or something.
Posted
It's ok because parks said he's a legit prospect. Like he has to be differentiated from Wes Darvill or something.

The important thing for Parks to stress is that even if an "advanced college bat" hit a home run every time in A ball it wouldn't be a big deal. It should rather be judged by how FAR they hit said home runs.

Guest
Guests
Posted
It's ok because parks said he's a legit prospect. Like he has to be differentiated from Wes Darvill or something.

The important thing for Parks to stress is that even if an "advanced college bat" hit a home run every time in A ball it wouldn't be a big deal. It should rather be judged by how FAR they hit said home runs.

Nothing so obvious. It's more esoteric nuance that he wants to lay claim to.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Sure would be nice to see Andrew McKirahan and Starling Peralta promoted to AA and Juan Paniagua bumped up to Daytona.
Verified Member
Posted
Schwarber again. He's got to be going to Daytona fairly soon. A couple weeks?

 

7 homers and 6 K's for Schwarber.

 

I don't expect him to be quite the monster Bryant is in the upper levels, but the low k rate will be a nice change.

 

the low k rate is pretty unheard of with that kind of power. i don't know how he's doing it.

 

He's just legit really strong so he doesn't have to have a huge swing like Baez & Bryant do to generate that type of power. Plus he's got a really mature hitting approach so he won't be taking home run hacks in a 0-2 count.

Posted
Is Schwarber better than Bryant? Not sayin' just sayin'...
.... I know I shouldn't read too much into these stats at low levels for a college bat who just finished his college season, buuut, those are some pretty good stats …..

 

Schwarber is 13 months older than Almora. Funny how Schwarber is perceived as so old that whatever good he does is to be expected and nothing to be excited about; while Almora is considered to be so young that whatever struggles he has are only to be expected and nothing to be worried about.

 

While I agree that what Schwarber is doing is ridiculous and deserves massive credit, I disagree with this exact analogy. Schwarber is a year older and a level under. Being 20 and struggling in High A (not to mention he's showing signs of life) is fairly common. If he were a year older struggling, I'd be worried. As it is, I'm honestly not.

 

I've read comments from somebody in the FO that suggest they're doing the same thing with Almora this year that they did with Castro last year. So I guess we just have to hope it has the same end result.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
I've read comments from somebody in the FO that suggest they're doing the same thing with Almora this year that they did with Castro last year. So I guess we just have to hope it has the same end result.

Screw around with his hitting approach and watch him struggle all year? I was more under the impression that they basically told Starlin to be Starlin this season and he's gone back to the player we knew and loved.

Posted
I've read comments from somebody in the FO that suggest they're doing the same thing with Almora this year that they did with Castro last year. So I guess we just have to hope it has the same end result.

Screw around with his hitting approach and watch him struggle all year? I was more under the impression that they basically told Starlin to be Starlin this season and he's gone back to the player we knew and loved.

 

Yeah, but they're taking credit for it, as if their screwing around caused him to end up roughly where his career trajectory was taking him anyway.

 

"Just like Castro!" is going to be the go-to for any young player having a crappy season forever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...