Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Guest
Guests
Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

If the Cubs agreed with that evaluation of his ceiling, they would have taken the rumored AA reliever. Whitley, I think it was?

 

Plus, most are saying his change is a plus pitch.

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Apparently Cashman didn't want to make the Soriano trade, but was pressured into it by ownership. If I were him I would be planning my exit from New York and looking for another job with less owner interference.

 

Cashman would not directly confirm what he advised Hal Steinbrenner, but told The Post: “I would say we are in a desperate time. Ownership wants to go for it. I didn’t want to give up a young arm [Corey Black]. But I understand the desperate need we have for offense. And Soriano will help us. The bottom line is this guy makes us better. Did ownership want him? Absolutely, yes. Does he make us better? Absolutely, yes. This is what Hal wants, and this is why we are doing it.”

 

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/yankees/sori_no_mzJu6LVyJb31fpQ5RVHqOM

Posted
Apparently Cashman didn't want to make the Soriano trade, but was pressured into it by ownership. If I were him I would be planning my exit from New York and looking for another job with less owner interference.

 

Cashman would not directly confirm what he advised Hal Steinbrenner, but told The Post: “I would say we are in a desperate time. Ownership wants to go for it. I didn’t want to give up a young arm [Corey Black]. But I understand the desperate need we have for offense. And Soriano will help us. The bottom line is this guy makes us better. Did ownership want him? Absolutely, yes. Does he make us better? Absolutely, yes. This is what Hal wants, and this is why we are doing it.”

 

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/yankees/sori_no_mzJu6LVyJb31fpQ5RVHqOM

 

 

Deja vu

Guest
Guests
Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

If the Cubs agreed with that evaluation of his ceiling, they would have taken the rumored AA reliever. Whitley, I think it was?

 

Plus, most are saying his change is a plus pitch.

 

I'm guessing the Cubs either disagree with that evaluation or still prefer Black to other options.

Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

If the Cubs agreed with that evaluation of his ceiling, they would have taken the rumored AA reliever. Whitley, I think it was?

 

Plus, most are saying his change is a plus pitch.

 

I'm guessing the Cubs either disagree with that evaluation or still prefer Black to other options.

 

It sounds like Parks was just stating what he knew of him personally form seeing him pitch, and it sounds like he's inferring he hasn't seen a lot of him so he's just going off of what he knows.

Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

If the Cubs agreed with that evaluation of his ceiling, they would have taken the rumored AA reliever. Whitley, I think it was?

 

Plus, most are saying his change is a plus pitch.

 

I'm guessing the Cubs either disagree with that evaluation or still prefer Black to other options.

 

It sounds like Parks was just stating what he knew of him personally form seeing him pitch, and it sounds like he's inferring he hasn't seen a lot of him so he's just going off of what he knows.

 

It's a pretty reasonable stance. Smallish frame with a big fastball and spotty control. Those guys usually end up in the pen.

Posted
Most of us here would probably agree that a team bullpen is the most variable element to a team. To avoid the Hendry strategy of signing the FA reliever with the best ERA in 60 innings, we are collecting bullpen arms for the time when it matters. You need 5 or 6 guys, what do we have, 15 intriguing arms in A?
Community Moderator
Posted
Corey Black ‏@CblackCHC 1h

For my physical done. Took all of five minutes for the doc to sign off. Ready to throw for the cubs

Retweeted by Paul Sullivan

 

Did he change his twitter handle?

Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

How is it possible for a guy to have a "high-effort delivery" and still hit 95 "with ease"? Those terms seem to be contradictory.

Posted
Corey Black ‏@CblackCHC 1h

For my physical done. Took all of five minutes for the doc to sign off. Ready to throw for the cubs

Retweeted by Paul Sullivan

 

Did he change his twitter handle?

 

It would appear so.

Community Moderator
Posted
Corey Black ‏@CblackCHC 1h

For my physical done. Took all of five minutes for the doc to sign off. Ready to throw for the cubs

Retweeted by Paul Sullivan

 

Did he change his twitter handle?

 

It would appear so.

 

Heh, dumb question in retrospect. Would've been a pretty awkward run with the Yanks if that's not a change.

Posted
Jason Parks[/url]"]He's a short RHP with a high-effort delivery and a very good FB. I've seen him work 95-plus with ease, showing good late life on the ball. It's a 7 pitch. He's a reliever all the way. I've seen him drop a decent CH before, and I know he had both a CB and SL. He could be a seventh-inning type, but it's a limited ceiling.

 

How is it possible for a guy to have a "high-effort delivery" and still hit 95 "with ease"? Those terms seem to be contradictory.

 

I wouldn't think so. I'd assume the high-effort delivery refers to how loose and how much body/strength he has to put into it, and the ease is more about consistency of hitting that velocity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...