Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
That's sickening. Umpires should be forced to adhere to a standard zone. None of this "well, this guy calls it low, and this guy has a tight zone, and that pitch is a strike if you're a veteran pitcher but not if you're a rookie "crap. Standard zone for everyone, with reasonable deviation due to human error.
Posted
i really hope I'm still alive when there are robot umpires

 

Seriously. I don't get when even people that believe there should be instant replay in baseball always add, "But NOT for balls and strikes!"

 

I would rather an ump have someone in his ear telling him what the K-zone said over any other replay they have in baseball. I think strike zones that differ between half-innings affect way more games than anything else. Are these people that don't want balls and strikes to be included thinking it will be some sort of challenge from the player? Just let K-zone call it. Let the ump stand there and he can give us the result.

Posted
i really hope I'm still alive when there are robot umpires

 

Seriously. I don't get when even people that believe there should be instant replay in baseball always add, "But NOT for balls and strikes!"

 

I would rather an ump have someone in his ear telling him what the K-zone said over any other replay they have in baseball. I think strike zones that differ between half-innings affect way more games than anything else. Are these people that don't want balls and strikes to be included thinking it will be some sort of challenge from the player? Just let K-zone call it. Let the ump stand there and he can give us the result.

 

This.

 

I don't buy any of this "it's part of the game" garbage. The strike zone should be the strike zone, no matter the umpire, the pitcher on the mound, the umpire's mood, or any other factor.

Posted
this is why we don't have jobs in america

 

So then you're in favor of wildly fluctuating strike zones?

 

Sure. It's just a game, and having different umpire interpretations of a strike zone makes it more interesting

Posted
this is why we don't have jobs in america

 

So then you're in favor of wildly fluctuating strike zones?

 

Sure. It's just a game, and having different umpire interpretations of a strike zone makes it more interesting

 

I don't think that is true at all.

Posted
this is why we don't have jobs in america

 

So then you're in favor of wildly fluctuating strike zones?

 

Sure. It's just a game, and having different umpire interpretations of a strike zone makes it more interesting

 

I don't think that is true at all.

 

Nor do I. I'd hate it just as much if certain umpires called runners who were out at first by a half step as safe, or vice-versa. Things like that don't make the game more interesting. The rules are not a "guideline."

Posted

bad umpiring is not a significant issue that's crippling the game. not even close. for the most part they do a fine job.

 

replacing the home plate umpire with a robot is just weird.

Posted
bad umpiring is not a significant issue that's crippling the game. not even close. for the most part they do a fine job.

 

replacing the home plate umpire with a robot is just weird.

 

The lack of crippling of the game is hardly a defense of something that is still done poorly.

Posted

jesus you people are making me feel like bill plaschke.

 

is it really that weird to want to have humans officiating a sport played by other humans?

Posted
jesus you people are making me feel like bill plaschke.

 

is it really that weird to want to have humans officiating a sport played by other humans?

 

more wrong that weird. we can significantly improve umpiring with relative ease. why wouldn't we do it?

Posted
jesus you people are making me feel like bill plaschke.

 

is it really that weird to want to have humans officiating a sport played by other humans?

 

I think it's weird to find the poor job they do charming or accept it as something that has to be a part of the game.

Posted
jesus you people are making me feel like bill plaschke.

 

is it really that weird to want to have humans officiating a sport played by other humans?

 

I think it's weird to find the poor job they do charming or accept it as something that has to be a part of the game.

 

Pretty much this. I'm not for "robot umpires" necessarily, but I AM 100% in favor of consistency and weeding out the worst of the worst, which does not happen.

Posted
bad umpiring is not a significant issue that's crippling the game. not even close. for the most part they do a fine job.

 

replacing the home plate umpire with a robot is just weird.

 

The lack of crippling of the game is hardly a defense of something that is still done poorly.

It's not done poorly. This sequence is clearly an outlier.

 

The sort of accuracy and consistency people are craving is already being achieved by the human umps. They're not infallible, but they're right 99.9% of the time. Things like video replays and timing equipment (in other sports) aren't infallable either. There's a failure rate with technology too.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
im with rocket and *gulp* dave, i want fat old men out there. Though it would be cool if they had a cold, inhuman robot boss, maybe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...