Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 211
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted
now -33 run differential in 20 games... not great.

 

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters.

Posted
now -33 run differential in 20 games... not great.

 

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters.

 

Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games.

Posted
now -33 run differential in 20 games... not great.

 

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters.

 

Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games.

 

which is still ****ing terrible.

Posted
now -33 run differential in 20 games... not great.

 

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters.

 

Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games.

 

which is still ****ing terrible.

 

plus you have zambrano, who has missed time each of the last couple of years; cashner, who was in the bullpen much of last year and is unproven as a major league starter; dempster, who sometimes falls over railings... the bottom line is that starters sometimes get hurt, and the cubs chose to not have adequate backup options in case injuries happened.

Posted
now -33 run differential in 20 games... not great.

 

If I didn't know better, I'd start to suspect we aren't world beaters.

 

Obviously not world beaters, but when you have 2/5 of your rotation as non ML-starters the results are pretty predictable. Eliminate the 12-2 and the 11-2 blowouts started by Coleman and Russell and you have a -14 run differential in 18 games.

 

which is still ****ing terrible.

 

So far the Cubs have shown they're a team flirting with .500, which is pretty much what everybody expected. It's still early, but things might get a little better when Cashner and Wells return, the other starters show more consistency, and production from Pena, Soto, and Byrd picks up. Of course, there's a good chance that Castro and Barney come back down to earth to negate some of the positives.

Posted

Coleman this year:

 

7.43 ERA .339 BAA 2.03 WHIP

 

Believe it or not he has a worse WHIP than James Russell. Maybe Dolis or J. Jackson should be given a chance?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...