Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
lol yeah statistics before and after the game in question are completely worthless to the discussion.

They are. Nobody's arguing that the outing didn't wind up adversely impacting Harang.

 

The issues are, a) was this reasonably foreseeable, and b) were there better options available.

 

The answer to a) is, basically no.

 

The answer to b) is, using the next day's starter is the only real viable one IMO, and even then it's a highly debatable point.

 

oh i see, it was not reasonably foreseeable to think that having a guy throw 62 pitches on two days' rest after throwing 100+ pitches in his last outing might be rendered injured or less effective in subsequent starts.

The added risk of injury was trivial relative to any other start.

 

It was clear that Harang's workload would need to be curtailed in his next start, and it was.

 

Lingering issues months later were not reasonably foreseeable.

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
It was clear that Harang's workload would need to be curtailed in his next start, and it was.

 

because he got drilled by the [expletive] pirates, not because dusty was being responsible.

 

As he pitched on 3 days rest from his relief appearance

Posted

Whether Harang's career was ruined by Dusty Baker, that's not the point. Who the hell knows why Harang sucked, he simply sucked. Maybe it was building over the years, maybe he was over his head in 2007, maybe he's just not that good.

 

The point is that Dusty Baker has no ability to manage outside of the moment that he is in. It's why he pulled Russ Ortiz in Game 7 of the World Series, it's why Harang threw 340 pitches in 11 days, and it's why Mark Guthrie was on the mound in the 10th inning in Game 1 of the NLCS. Dusty Baker cannot manage complex tasks and think critically. It's not an accusation, it's a fact.

Posted
It was clear that Harang's workload would need to be curtailed in his next start, and it was.

 

because he got drilled by the [expletive] pirates, not because dusty was being responsible.

 

Yeah, you really think Dusty would have taken Harang out after 73 pitches if he had only allowed a run on four hits through six innings?

Posted
It was clear that Harang's workload would need to be curtailed in his next start, and it was.

 

because he got drilled by the [expletive] pirates, not because dusty was being responsible.

 

Yeah, you really think Dusty would have taken Harang out after 73 pitches if he had only allowed a run on four hits through six innings?

 

[expletive] no. What kind of message would that send?

Posted
Was Reuben Quevedo 'ruined' by Dusty or Baylor? Maybe he should be in the support group, I can't remember...

 

I thought he was ruined by Little Debbie.

Posted
Was Reuben Quevedo 'ruined' by Dusty or Baylor? Maybe he should be in the support group, I can't remember...
His only season with the Cubs was 2000, Baylor's first season as manager.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...