Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Example on why Hendry should be fired


Alright, so the game is still going on, but if the Cubs lose today here are two reasons why this franchise has done poorly this year and have not had as much success as people would think:

 

9th inning, runner on third, one out. All the Cubs need is a healthy fly ball. Only a pop up or strike out really does not get the job done with the infield in. Soriano hits a soft fly ball to center, too shallow for Fukudome to score. The next batter, Tyler Colvin, struck out to end the inning. But that inning solely rests on Soriano not putting that ball in the air deep enough. He's paid $17 million a year and he can't hit a fly ball.

 

10th inning, runners on first and third, one out. Again, fly ball to any three spots, and the game is over and the Cubs win. Fukudome strikes out against Brandon Lyon. Fukudome paid $10 million a year. No fly ball for the game-winning RBI. The next batter, Geovany Soto, flies out to left field to end the inning.

 

These two outfielders, among other players, have failed to produce in these situations. Not just this year, but throughout their entire years with the Cubs. Yes, they have had game-winning hits, but these are things that triumph those.

 

Hendry overpaying for players that can't even hit healthy fly balls. What a shame. Unbelievable. Tom Ricketts, I hope you know what you're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hendry should be fired because the team has lost too many games during his 8 year run.

 

The problem with situations that "only require a deep fly ball to score" is it's not just as simple as wanting to hit a deep fly ball.

 

I understand what you're saying, and I too acknowledge the fact that the team has lost too many games under Hendry's tenure. But specifically under Piniella, it's situations like these why the Cubs lose. Look at all the one-run games this team has lost. If the Astros win 2-1 today, you have to point to those two at-bats at being turning points in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, what exactly do you think was wrong with Soriano's approach when he flew out? "I want to hit this in the air, but not too deep?"

 

His approach should be driving the ball center, right-center to end the game. Bottom line.

 

He flew out to center field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old-Timey Member
I mean, what exactly do you think was wrong with Soriano's approach when he flew out? "I want to hit this in the air, but not too deep?"

 

His approach should be driving the ball center, right-center to end the game. Bottom line.

 

He flew out to center field.

 

BUT DID HE DRIVE THE BALL?!?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, what exactly do you think was wrong with Soriano's approach when he flew out? "I want to hit this in the air, but not too deep?"

 

His approach should be driving the ball center, right-center to end the game. Bottom line.

 

His approach should be trying to hit the ball the way he has all year, hope for a hit, but take a flyout. When you change your approach, all you do is screw yourself up. You can't just hit a long fly ball on demand against ML pitchers, they're kinda good too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever, you guys just don't get it. Really poor baseball IQ's on this board. Very poor.

 

Shut up. You sound like an idiot with statements like this. We all know the sacrifice fly would have been nice. But it's absurd to say the GM should be fired because two outfielders did not hit sac flies. It's baseball, guys cannot hit the ball on command.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever, you guys just don't get it. Really poor baseball IQ's on this board. Very poor.

 

Shut up. You sound like an idiot with statements like this. We all know the sacrifice fly would have been nice. But it's absurd to say the GM should be fired because two outfielders did not hit sac flies. It's baseball, guys cannot hit the ball on command.

 

On command? When did I ever say that!? Look, it's 2-1 now in the 12th and the inning still isn't over. Those two guys didn't get the job done, end of story. I can hit a pop up too for $17 million. This is only part of the reason why Hendry should be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ridiculous that the Cubs couldn't score the runner from 2nd in that inning. All you need is a single. His approach should've been to hit the ball where the fielders weren't, but instead he's out there flying out to the warning track.

 

To be fair, the fielders weren't at the warning track when he swung.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever, you guys just don't get it. Really poor baseball IQ's on this board. Very poor.

 

Shut up. You sound like an idiot with statements like this. We all know the sacrifice fly would have been nice. But it's absurd to say the GM should be fired because two outfielders did not hit sac flies. It's baseball, guys cannot hit the ball on command.

 

On command? When did I ever say that!? Look, it's 2-1 now in the 12th and the inning still isn't over. Those two guys didn't get the job done, end of story. I can hit a pop up too for $17 million. This is only part of the reason why Hendry should be fired.

 

You are blaming Soriano for hitting a fly to short center field instead of deep right center field. That's insisting a guy should be able to hit the ball on command and place it perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever, you guys just don't get it. Really poor baseball IQ's on this board. Very poor.

 

Shut up. You sound like an idiot with statements like this. We all know the sacrifice fly would have been nice. But it's absurd to say the GM should be fired because two outfielders did not hit sac flies. It's baseball, guys cannot hit the ball on command.

 

On command? When did I ever say that!? Look, it's 2-1 now in the 12th and the inning still isn't over. Those two guys didn't get the job done, end of story. I can hit a pop up too for $17 million. This is only part of the reason why Hendry should be fired.

 

I'm willing to bet you couldn't hit a pop up off of Matt Lindstrom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever, you guys just don't get it. Really poor baseball IQ's on this board. Very poor.

 

Shut up. You sound like an idiot with statements like this. We all know the sacrifice fly would have been nice. But it's absurd to say the GM should be fired because two outfielders did not hit sac flies. It's baseball, guys cannot hit the ball on command.

 

On command? When did I ever say that!? Look, it's 2-1 now in the 12th and the inning still isn't over. Those two guys didn't get the job done, end of story. I can hit a pop up too for $17 million. This is only part of the reason why Hendry should be fired.

 

 

No you couldn't.

 

And the whole premise of this thread is that Hendry should be hired because Soriano couldn't hit a Sac Fly, how is that not doing it on demand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Hendry signed Soriano to be a designated sac flier. In fact, I bet when Hendry signed Soriano he would have promised Soriano didn't have to hit any sac flies if he put up a +.900 ops every year of his contract.

 

Hendry should be fired but there are about 4,000,000,000,000 better reasons than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...