Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Guest
Guests
Posted
That's [expletive]. That ball was off Odom because Rondo hit his arm. No reason they should overturn that.

 

Yeah they should. They didn't call a foul and the ball went out off Odom. (And yes I know it was a foul)

 

Either you keep it Lakers ball or you call the foul on Rondo. The whole point of replay is to get it right (not that they did it there or on the Garnett play in Game 2). If you can change who has the ball, you should be able to rule it was a foul after the review in that scenario since it was one because it should be Laker ball with either them taking it out or Odom at the foul line.

 

You really can't be serious advocating calling the foul on the review. They were reviewing who the ball went off of, the foul is completely irrelevant. I mean when the NFL reviews a play should they be able to call a penalty for holding, or facemasking, or whatever if they see it? That's ignorant.

 

Call the foul only if it affects the result of the play. If Rondo hacks Odom and the ball is off Rondo, don't worry about the foul.

 

But it should have been Laker ball there.

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Fouls are missed all the time in the NBA, you cant review a play for an out of bounds and notice you missed a foul and call the foul, thats absurd. It doesn't matter if it affects the play or not, its a review of who the ball went out of bound out of, not a review of who it went off of, and why it went off of him.
Posted
That's [expletive]. That ball was off Odom because Rondo hit his arm. No reason they should overturn that.

 

Yeah they should. They didn't call a foul and the ball went out off Odom. (And yes I know it was a foul)

 

Either you keep it Lakers ball or you call the foul on Rondo. The whole point of replay is to get it right (not that they did it there or on the Garnett play in Game 2). If you can change who has the ball, you should be able to rule it was a foul after the review in that scenario since it was one because it should be Laker ball with either them taking it out or Odom at the foul line.

 

You really can't be serious advocating calling the foul on the review. They were reviewing who the ball went off of, the foul is completely irrelevant. I mean when the NFL reviews a play should they be able to call a penalty for holding, or facemasking, or whatever if they see it? That's ignorant.

 

Call the foul only if it affects the result of the play. If Rondo hacks Odom and the ball is off Rondo, don't worry about the foul.

 

But it should have been Laker ball there.

 

i agree. i wouldn't call a foul though. i would just say that while the ball went off of one team, the player was interfered with and award the ball to the correct team.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
The Celtics need to calm down a little. They have the lead at home, no need to get up in Odom's face little Nate.

 

his "face" (armpit)

Posted
The Celtics need to calm down a little. They have the lead at home, no need to get up in Odom's face little Nate.

 

his "face" (armpit)

 

Haha ok good point.

Posted
This is really ballsy by Rivers. I don't necessarily agree, but it's certainly ballsy

 

Agreed. But I think PP needs to be out there right now, TA kinda looks lost now.

Guest
Guests
Posted

Lakers got murdered on the offensive glass tonight. Difference in the game.

 

Game 5 should be a good one - another must win for Boston.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Big Bay drooling was the most awesome thing ever.
Posted
Lakers got murdered on the offensive glass tonight. Difference in the game.

 

Game 5 should be a good one - another must win for Boston.

 

It's not really a "must" win.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Lakers got murdered on the offensive glass tonight. Difference in the game.

 

Game 5 should be a good one - another must win for Boston.

 

It's not really a "must" win.

 

Technically no, since it's not an elimination game, but there aren't more than a handful of people in the world outside of the Celtics locker room who realistically believe they can win both Games 6 and 7 in LA.

Posted
Lakers got murdered on the offensive glass tonight. Difference in the game.

 

Game 5 should be a good one - another must win for Boston.

 

It's not really a "must" win.

 

Technically no, since it's not an elimination game, but there aren't more than a handful of people in the world outside of the Celtics locker room who realistically believe they can win both Games 6 and 7 in LA.

 

If they win tomorrow, I certainly think Boston can split in LA and win the title. They've already split in LA earlier this series. Why can't they do it again?

Posted
Lakers got murdered on the offensive glass tonight. Difference in the game.

 

Game 5 should be a good one - another must win for Boston.

 

It's not really a "must" win.

 

Technically no, since it's not an elimination game, but there aren't more than a handful of people in the world outside of the Celtics locker room who realistically believe they can win both Games 6 and 7 in LA.

 

If they win tomorrow, I certainly think Boston can split in LA and win the title. They've already split in LA earlier this series. Why can't they do it again?

 

re-read the posts you're replying to.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Add Ron Artest to the All-Flop Lakers team with Fisher and Gasol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...