Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Guest
Guests
Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

This, no way should that be called.

Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

 

I think saying a little obstructed is underselling it. His left arm was being held down as he grabbed for the ball to heave. It's not like Brown had a great look from 45 feet when Mack fouled him.

Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

This, no way should that be called.

 

The problem is that the first foul wasn't much of a foul, either. In the final equation, I don't have a problem with the end of the game because one dumb foul negated the other. The end result was Butler up by one, which was the scenario at the start of the sequence.

 

I don't think Pitt was wronged at all.

Guest
Guests
Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

 

I think saying a little obstructed is underselling it. His left arm was being held down as he grabbed for the ball to heave. It's not like Brown had a great look from 45 feet when Mack fouled him.

 

If Mack didn't hip check him then Brown would've been able to get to the 3 point line with his momentum and the time remaining. I'm not even sure they blow the whistle on the second one at all if Howard didn't flop like a dead fish.

Posted
Is there really a significant number of people who think those fouls shouldn't have been called in the Pitt/Butler game? Or is this just a media-generated story?

 

 

They looked like pretty obvious fouls to me -- the kind that can't be ignored, even in the final seconds.

 

I'm kinda of the mind that the refs probably should have swallowed the whistle on the second one. I think you have to understand the consequences of your actions, and essentially giving the game to Butler because Howard was a little obstructed in an attempt to wheel and throw the ball 85 feet doesn't seem very just to me.

 

I think saying a little obstructed is underselling it. His left arm was being held down as he grabbed for the ball to heave. It's not like Brown had a great look from 45 feet when Mack fouled him.

 

If Mack didn't hip check him then Brown would've been able to get to the 3 point line with his momentum and the time remaining. I'm not even sure they blow the whistle on the second one at all if Howard didn't flop like a dead fish.

 

Howard was clearly fouled. He flopped a bit, but it was absolutely a foul.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...