Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted
1998 - Sammy Sosa

That one was bad, but it wasn't monumentally bad. Not nearly as ridiculous as Rollins winning it this year, IMO.

 

Sosa was 7th in VORP that year and a whopping 36 runs worse than McGwire.

 

Cubs made the playoffs, Cardinals didnt? Just trying to look at it how the voters did. Obviously statistically his OBP, SLG, VORP, OPS+ were worse than Big Macs.

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
even in his down year pujols should have gotten a lot more mvp consideration. his 12.7 warp3 is better than everyone mentioned except for david wright, who equals pujols's 12.7 warp3.
Posted

Not that I'm saying Rollins deserves it, but 28 Win Shares (with the leader at 34) and a 11.5 WARP3 (higher than H. Ramirez) are pretty darn strong.

 

David Wright probably deserved it, but had no realistic shot after the Mets collapse. It's not fair, but it'll always be that way.

Posted
1998 - Sammy Sosa

That one was bad, but it wasn't monumentally bad. Not nearly as ridiculous as Rollins winning it this year, IMO.

 

Sosa was 7th in VORP that year and a whopping 36 runs worse than McGwire.

 

Cubs made the playoffs, Cardinals didnt? Just trying to look at it how the voters did. Obviously statistically his OBP, SLG, VORP, OPS+ were worse than Big Macs.

 

IIRC, that was the prevailing "wisdom." Sammy had "carried" the Cubs to the playoffs and Big Mac didn't make it.

 

Honestly, we can quote great stats all day long but I'm pretty sure very, very few of the voters look at anything beyond the basics.

Posted
Honestly, we can quote great stats all day long but I'm pretty sure very, very few of the voters look at anything beyond the basics.

 

Divining what the voters looked at wasn't the point of posting the stats. If I wanted to understand the voters' thought processes, I could try reading tea leaves or casting bones.

Posted
This discussion goes back to a point I've been trying to make for years. Since some writers go by the definition of MVP meaning most valuable to the team, while others go by the definition of best player in the league, there ought to be two seperate awards. MVP would be the player most valuable to their team picked from players on teams finishing 1st or 2nd in their division. Player of the Year would be the best player picked from any team. As you can see by my screen name, I was a big fan of Ernie Banks who was MVP in 1958 and 1959 for last place teams. How valuable could he have been since the team finished last? He should have been named Player of the Year.
Posted

why should a player be punished because his teammates suck?

 

the mvp is a useless award if there's a separate "player of the year" award.

Posted
even in his down year pujols should have gotten a lot more mvp consideration. his 12.7 warp3 is better than everyone mentioned except for david wright, who equals pujols's 12.7 warp3.

 

dont worry i had number two.

Posted

Ouch, in 1989, Dawson had a 4.6 WARP...the WARP of the other vote getters:

 

Raines: 9.7

Gwynn: 11.4

Eric Davis: 11.4

Schmidt: 10.3

Ozzie Smith: 10.3

Jack Clark: 7.4

Will Clark: 7.5

Murphy: 11.1

Strawberry: 8.9

Posted
10th place finish for hanley ramirez, and no votes above 5th place.... booooooooooo

 

To be fair, according to the Fielding Bible, Hanley was the second-worst defensive infielder in MLB last year, behind only the historically bad Ryan Braun. Hanley was worse than Derek Jeter.

 

Rollins was probably worth slightly more than Hanley because he was an above-average defensive shortstop and Hanley was a wretched one. According to BP's stats, for example, Rollins was probably worth half a win more.

 

But he was still not a good choice.

Posted
Bill Plaschke and Jay Mariotti are members of the BBWAA.

 

Just sayin.

 

Bill Plaschke pretty much invented the love letter to crappy baseball players. That's all I need to know.

Posted
1998 - Sammy Sosa

That one was bad, but it wasn't monumentally bad. Not nearly as ridiculous as Rollins winning it this year, IMO.

 

Sosa was 7th in VORP that year and a whopping 36 runs worse than McGwire.

 

Cubs made the playoffs, Cardinals didnt? Just trying to look at it how the voters did. Obviously statistically his OBP, SLG, VORP, OPS+ were worse than Big Macs.

 

Is that any different than Rollins winning it over Cabrera, Ramirez and Wright?

Posted

Curtis Granderson does everything (except play SS) better than Jimmy Rollins, and I didn't hear anyone jonesing for him in the AL.

 

Higher AVG, higher OBP, higher SLG, more walks (despite over 100 fewer PA's), just as many doubles, more triples, 17 fewer runs (again, over 100 fewer PA's), etc. etc.

Posted (edited)
Curtis Granderson does everything (except play SS) better than Jimmy Rollins, and I didn't hear anyone jonesing for him in the AL.

The NL didn't have as clear a winner as the AL.

Edited by haltz
Posted
The NL didn't have as clear a winner as the AL.

I know, but Matt Holliday should've been clear enough.

 

I'd give it to Wright easily before Holliday.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...