Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I'm not talking about players in general though, I'm talking about one player. So yes, when you have one player who's been at the same level for four years, it's a perfectly fine sample size.

 

You don't need to look at 100 years worth of data to find something out about one guy.

 

There you go, Jacque.

 

Edit: Jacque? Wow, not sure where that came from.

 

 

This is completely your opinion and miles and miles away from being fact.

  • Replies 731
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
hill has only thrown 74 pitches and really settled in the last 3 innings... stupid lou

Agreed, there's no reason to take him out right now unless he asked to be removed.

Posted
The day is done for Hill.

 

I'd have let him go one more, but that's just me.

 

I would have to, but I can understand Lou's thinking here.

 

You're gonna have to explain it to me.

 

Keep him fresh for the playoffs?? Dunno.

Posted
Remember his last start when it was obvious something was bothering his leg. Maybe this has something to do with that and they are just being cautious.
Posted
The day is done for Hill.

 

I'd have let him go one more, but that's just me.

 

I would have to, but I can understand Lou's thinking here.

 

You're gonna have to explain it to me.

 

He's got a runner on base, so he wants to use a hitter to try to pile some more on. Furthermore, it's down the stretch. He can use Marmol, Wood, Howry, and Dempster to end the game.

 

I would have conserved the pen, but I know what Lou is wanting to do here.

Posted

I'm not talking about players in general though, I'm talking about one player. So yes, when you have one player who's been at the same level for four years, it's a perfectly fine sample size.

 

You don't need to look at 100 years worth of data to find something out about one guy.

 

There you go, Jacque.

 

Edit: Jacque? Wow, not sure where that came from.

 

 

This is completely your opinion and miles and miles away from being fact.

How? If you know that Ramirez was good with RISP in 2004, good with RISP in 2005, good with RISP in 2006, and good with RISP in 2007, you're telling me that you can't logically conclude that he'll be good with RISP in 2008?

Posted
The ump looks like Soda Popinski throwing a left hook when he rings up a batter.

 

Awesome comparison. :lol:

 

I love that game.

Posted

I'm not talking about players in general though, I'm talking about one player. So yes, when you have one player who's been at the same level for four years, it's a perfectly fine sample size.

 

You don't need to look at 100 years worth of data to find something out about one guy.

 

There you go, Jacque.

 

Edit: Jacque? Wow, not sure where that came from.

 

 

This is completely your opinion and miles and miles away from being fact.

How? If you know that Ramirez was good with RISP in 2004, good with RISP in 2005, good with RISP in 2006, and good with RISP in 2007, you're telling me that you can't logically conclude that he'll be good with RISP in 2008?

 

While I do agree with that statement (we can't logically conclude that at all), what I'm really telling you is that you can't just arbitrarily conclude what a good sample size is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...