Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 386
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
if i were about to sign a contract worth over 100 million i'd probably refer to myself in the third person
I'd refer to myself as Captain Moneypants.
Posted

 

Moreover, I think a package of players like Kendrick, Weaver, and Morales would be doable. Zambrano is a legitimate ace and we've seen guys with significantly less talent get traded for obscene packages. You don't think Zambrano could command a package like Tabata/Hughes/Sanchez from the Yankees, Maybin/Miller/Jurrjens from the Tigers, Pelfrey/Milledge/Gomez from the Mets? Personally, I think teams would be happy to offer up those packages to get what essentially would be a guaranteed playoff ticket in Zambrano.

 

Personally, no I don't think we could get those packages. Its hard to tell though. Who was the last player of Z's stature to be traded the year before he became a FA? Beltran is all I can think of. He netted Mark Teahen, John Buck, Mike Wood, and cash. Not the plentiful bounty in the trade proposals above.

Posted
if i were about to sign a contract worth over 100 million i'd probably refer to myself in the third person
I'd refer to myself as Captain Moneypants.

 

I'd give myself a rank higher than Captain. General Motors ruined the title General, and plus I just got an electric bill for $254 (and I live in a freakin one bedroom), so General Electric, or anything with the word electric in it boils my blood. General Mills wins some of that back because food is good, but the damage is done.

 

Colonel Moneypants has a nice ring to it. Colonel Sanders makes good chicken and Colonel Angus is one of the like 3 funny sketches SNL has put out in the last 5 years.

 

You could go the Navy route, but if we are talking about Moneypants, I don't think Seaman or Rear Admiral would work well before it.

Posted

Plus Colonel Sanders was a really loyal to dark helmet.

 

I've got a solution. Sign Zambrano to 7 years $20 million per, but have absolutely NO no trade clause in it. If you've got some guys who step up pitching wise, then you can trade him in a couple of years to someone with a big wallet and alot of prospects. .

Posted

Here's an idea:

 

Signed Z to a 3-4 yr deal worth say...$14 mill per. It keeps the Cubs financially responsible, plus it give the org enough time to see Veal/Pawelek/Guzman/Hill/Gallagher/ blah, blah enough time to know if any of those young pitchers can step up. If half of them step up before 2010, move Z (who should only be like 29-30 in 2010), and have a cheaper rotation. By think both Lilly and Marquis would be in their last yr, or already gone, and Prior is coming off a 4 yr stretch that rivals on Johan Santana.

Posted
Cubs without Carlos would be horrible.
Not necessarily. If they got Weaver and Kendrick in return for him, they could be just as good, and possibly better.
Posted
Here's an idea:

 

Signed Z to a 3-4 yr deal worth say...$14 mill per. It keeps the Cubs financially responsible, plus it give the org enough time to see Veal/Pawelek/Guzman/Hill/Gallagher/ blah, blah enough time to know if any of those young pitchers can step up. If half of them step up before 2010, move Z (who should only be like 29-30 in 2010), and have a cheaper rotation. By think both Lilly and Marquis would be in their last yr, or already gone, and Prior is coming off a 4 yr stretch that rivals on Johan Santana.

But why would Z sign a 3 or 4 year deal for 14M per?
Posted
Here's an idea:

 

Signed Z to a 3-4 yr deal worth say...$14 mill per. It keeps the Cubs financially responsible, plus it give the org enough time to see Veal/Pawelek/Guzman/Hill/Gallagher/ blah, blah enough time to know if any of those young pitchers can step up. If half of them step up before 2010, move Z (who should only be like 29-30 in 2010), and have a cheaper rotation. By think both Lilly and Marquis would be in their last yr, or already gone, and Prior is coming off a 4 yr stretch that rivals on Johan Santana.

But why would Z sign a 3 or 4 year deal for 14M per?

 

That won't happen. With all of Z talk he wants Zito's contract.

Posted

I would not sign Z to a 5 plus year deal worth 18 mill per. I don't know if I'd sign any pitcher to that sort of deal, lest his name were Koufax, Drysdale, Gibson, Matthewson, Maddux, Clemens....you get the point.

 

I think Z for ARod (assuming he agrees to an extension) is a good deal for us, but that is just me.

Posted
I still think Z will be resigned. He obviously is playing hardball with the negotiations. He's on record as wanting a Zito type deal and he just wants to show he meant what he said. In the end Hendry will have to give Z what he wants. The Cubs are a team built to win within the next 2 years and if Z leaves the whole plan collapses. I'm sure Hendry knows that would cost him his job.
Posted

Here is where a healthy Mark Prior could help the Cubs, leverage wise.

 

If I were Hendry, I'd see what he's worth right now. If the Angels offer a package including Weaver, I'd deal him. If we're getting offers of prospects that aren't ML ready and/or don't include a pitcher, I'd offer him a 3 year $54m deal with zero NTC's. If he doesn't accept, I play the season out. If we're in the race, keep him. If we suck, he'll be worth a damn fortune at the deadline. Deal him. If we're muddling about in a mediocre division, and Prior is healthy and Gooz is ripping up AAA, I'd deal him.

 

I love Z, but this is going to be Hendry's tipping point as GM. If he plays this right we'll be in good shape. If he screws this up we're in deep trouble.

Posted
Here is where a healthy Mark Prior could help the Cubs, leverage wise.

 

If I were Hendry, I'd see what he's worth right now. If the Angels offer a package including Weaver, I'd deal him. If we're getting offers of prospects that aren't ML ready and/or don't include a pitcher, I'd offer him a 3 year $54m deal with zero NTC's. If he doesn't accept, I play the season out. If we're in the race, keep him. If we suck, he'll be worth a damn fortune at the deadline. Deal him. If we're muddling about in a mediocre division, and Prior is healthy and Gooz is ripping up AAA, I'd deal him.

 

I love Z, but this is going to be Hendry's tipping point as GM. If he plays this right we'll be in good shape. If he screws this up we're in deep trouble.

 

How does Hendry not screw this up? Either he trades Z and endures the backlash or pays near FA market value for a guy with legit injury concerns.

 

Why can't Z pull a Carpenter/Oswalt and give us a decent hometown discount? How about a little love for the fans and the org that turned you into what you are as a pitcher?

Posted
Here is where a healthy Mark Prior could help the Cubs, leverage wise.

 

If I were Hendry, I'd see what he's worth right now. If the Angels offer a package including Weaver, I'd deal him. If we're getting offers of prospects that aren't ML ready and/or don't include a pitcher, I'd offer him a 3 year $54m deal with zero NTC's. If he doesn't accept, I play the season out. If we're in the race, keep him. If we suck, he'll be worth a damn fortune at the deadline. Deal him. If we're muddling about in a mediocre division, and Prior is healthy and Gooz is ripping up AAA, I'd deal him.

 

I love Z, but this is going to be Hendry's tipping point as GM. If he plays this right we'll be in good shape. If he screws this up we're in deep trouble.

 

How does Hendry not screw this up? Either he trades Z and endures the backlash or pays near FA market value for a guy with legit injury concerns.

 

The backlash would be short lived if he dealt him for a package like Weaver and Aybar.

Posted
Hendry would have had a lot more leverage in a trade if Z had been shopped in the fall or better yet at last summer's deadline. It's mid-February now and the contenders have their major pieces in place for next season. At this point Z would be a last-minute type of addition. Obviously he would still be attractive but it would have been better for teams to have time to plan around Z.
Posted
Some interesting points in the discussion. It sure would be nice to see Prior come back completely to reduce the fears of Zambrano leaving. As for waiting until the trade deadline, I can't see the Cubs being out of contention by July in the weak NL Central. I do think Zambrano is playing hardball right now and he might settle for a slight home town discount. He certainly has nothing to lose by playing hardball right now. Just add this to the list of items on the "Hendry can't win" list. He's damned if he signs him and damned if he doesn't.
Posted

I could be wrong, but Carlos has stated that he wants to be a Cub for the rest of his career.

 

Jim Hendry failed on Carlos a year or two ago, when he SHOULD of offered him an extension of some sort for less money, instead of waiting until the final year of his contract.

 

This guy is getting paid pennys compared to the other pitches of his caliber. Give him his money and end it.

Posted
Here is where a healthy Mark Prior could help the Cubs, leverage wise.

 

If I were Hendry, I'd see what he's worth right now. If the Angels offer a package including Weaver, I'd deal him. If we're getting offers of prospects that aren't ML ready and/or don't include a pitcher, I'd offer him a 3 year $54m deal with zero NTC's. If he doesn't accept, I play the season out. If we're in the race, keep him. If we suck, he'll be worth a damn fortune at the deadline. Deal him. If we're muddling about in a mediocre division, and Prior is healthy and Gooz is ripping up AAA, I'd deal him.

 

I love Z, but this is going to be Hendry's tipping point as GM. If he plays this right we'll be in good shape. If he screws this up we're in deep trouble.

 

How does Hendry not screw this up? Either he trades Z and endures the backlash or pays near FA market value for a guy with legit injury concerns.

 

The backlash would be short lived if he dealt him for a package like Weaver and Aybar.

 

Hey, I'm all for it, but Hendry is going to get roasted in the short term. He might not have a job long enough to see that deal turn out in the Cubs' favor.

 

Dealing Z is the best long term move, IMO, but it seems as though the Cubs are in to win it now, not develop prospects.

Posted
jimbo will get this done.

 

He might be maxxed out already. Z wants the kind of money that other teams build their entire rosters on.

 

If Hendry loses Zambrano, the Grim Reaper cometh.

Posted

How does Hendry not screw this up? Either he trades Z and endures the backlash or pays near FA market value for a guy with legit injury concerns.

 

Or you let him become a FA and get top draft picks. You're clearly not going to trade him before the deadline at this point, when you've went all-in to win this year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...