Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

Posted
Suppan is wayyy better than Lilly and wayyy more durable.

 

Nope.

 

Career numbers:

 

Lilly: 8.73 H/9, 1.38 HR/9, 3.67 BB/9, 7.68 K/9, 2.09 K/BB, 1.38 WHIP

 

Suppan: 9.79 H/9, 1.19 HR/9, 2.95 BB/9, 5.06 K/9, 1.72 K/BB, 1.42 WHIP

 

 

Factor in that Lilly pitched in the AL East for most of his career and in Toronto, a notorious bandbox (inflates HR numbers)...Lilly is the better pitcher. Suppan is more durable though, I'll give you that.

Posted
Sheets, Capuano, Suppan, Bush are not bad 4/5 starters. With the young talent they have on the team they think they have a chance at winning the division, which they do.
Posted
Sheets, Capuano, Suppan, Bush are not bad 4/5 starters. With the young talent they have on the team they think they have a chance at winning the division, which they do.

 

Sheets is just like Mary, when he's healthy, I think he's a number 1.

Posted
Sheets, Capuano, Suppan, Bush are not bad 4/5 starters. With the young talent they have on the team they think they have a chance at winning the division, which they do.

 

Sheets is just like Mary, when he's healthy, I think he's a number 1.

 

That particular post confused me as well-I think he meant though that those 4 are not bad for being 4/5ths of a teams starting rotation, not that each of them are 4 or 5 starter quality.

Posted
Sheets, Capuano, Suppan, Bush are not bad 4/5 starters. With the young talent they have on the team they think they have a chance at winning the division, which they do.

 

Sheets is just like Mary, when he's healthy, I think he's a number 1.

 

That particular post confused me as well-I think he meant though that those 4 are not bad for being 4/5ths of a teams starting rotation, not that each of them are 4 or 5 starter quality.

 

Re-read. Got it. RTI=[expletive].

Posted
Sheets, Capuano, Suppan, Bush are not bad 4/5 starters. With the young talent they have on the team they think they have a chance at winning the division, which they do.

 

Sheets is just like Mary, when he's healthy, I think he's a number 1.

 

That particular post confused me as well-I think he meant though that those 4 are not bad for being 4/5ths of a teams starting rotation, not that each of them are 4 or 5 starter quality.

 

Yeah, Sheets healthy is a #1. Capuano is a legit 2. Bush was very unlucky and could easily be a great #3. He had a sub 1.14 WHIP (7th in baseball just behind Brandon Webb). Better K and walk rate than Webb, with the major difference being that Bush is much more of a fly ball pitcher. He was excellent at home this year and bad on the road. If he evens that out as I expect, he could easily have an ERA around the 4.0 mark.

 

I don't like Suppan much, but the Brewers could have the best rotation in the NL if they sign a guy that can eat 200+ innings at a league average level.

Posted
Ronnie Woo Woo wrote:

I heard their offer is the same as the Cubs/Lilly deal. 4/40.

 

 

He is every bit as good as Lily

 

Suppan is wayyy better than Lilly and wayyy more durable.

 

 

ummm....No.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...