Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I read this in John Heymans article on SI talking about Bonds and this was mentioned in it:

 

On a more mundane level, Bonds has been slowed some by knee problems this year, and some think he'd be better off switching to the DH position. But Borris was quick to point out that Bonds finished fifth in range factor out of 11 qualifying left fielders in the National League, behind only Alfonso Soriano, Dave Roberts, Jason Bay and Matt Murton, and that Bonds' fielding stats resemble the 1994 season, when he won one of his eight Gold Glove awards. This season he has 188 putouts in 115 starts, compared to 198 putouts in 112 starts in 1994, six assists compared to 10, and three errors, same as in '94.

 

This is interesting, many people think that Murton is not good defensively and cannot cover much ground. Turns out he's better than I thought. Just another reason to make him a starter in '07.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I read this in John Heymans article on SI talking about Bonds and this was mentioned in it:

 

On a more mundane level, Bonds has been slowed some by knee problems this year, and some think he'd be better off switching to the DH position. But Borris was quick to point out that Bonds finished fifth in range factor out of 11 qualifying left fielders in the National League, behind only Alfonso Soriano, Dave Roberts, Jason Bay and Matt Murton, and that Bonds' fielding stats resemble the 1994 season, when he won one of his eight Gold Glove awards. This season he has 188 putouts in 115 starts, compared to 198 putouts in 112 starts in 1994, six assists compared to 10, and three errors, same as in '94.

 

This is interesting, many people think that Murton is not good defensively and cannot cover much ground. Turns out he's better than I thought. Just another reason to make him a starter in '07.

 

let's not get too excited about range factor

Posted

isn't the main knock on range factor that it is based on plays/outs and therefore doesn't account for Ks and flyball v. groundball pitchers?

 

well the Cubs staff leans groundball over flyball, and once again they lead the league in Ks, thus Murton had far less opportunity to build those RF stats, yet still managed to be top 5.

 

what do the defensive metrics say? I view Murton's defense to be firmly in the catagory of nonconcerns.

Posted
stat guys always point to stats, except when the stats don't support their bias.

 

Or they just point to the stats that tell you the whole story.

Guest
Guests
Posted
stat guys always point to stats, except when the stats don't support their bias.

Out of curiosity, which stat person are you attempting to impugn?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
general statement about moneyball guys.

 

Interesting point. :roll:

 

By the way, moneyball isn't about stats. It's about identifying weaknesses in the market and exploiting them. It's more about the economics of baseball. But I'm sure you already knew that; otherwise you'd just look silly talking about things you don't know.

 

You'd be better off using the term sabermetrician.

Posted
general statement about moneyball guys.

 

You probably should have started a rant thread instead of pulling a drive-by in this one.

Posted
stat guys always point to stats, except when the stats don't support their bias.

Find me a guy who is a hardcore defensive stat guy. If such a person exists I haven't met him/her.

Posted
general statement about moneyball guys.

 

You've been here a long time -- certainly long enough to know that you shouldn't make generalizations like this.

Posted
stat guys always point to stats, except when the stats don't support their bias.

Find me a guy who is a hardcore defensive stat guy. If such a person exists I haven't met him/her.

 

Mitchel Lichtman of UZR is. But he's a douchebag.

Posted
Yet another reason why defensive stats are virtuously worthless.

 

The idea of being (or calling someone) virtuously worthless makes me laugh.

Posted
Yet another reason why defensive stats are virtuously worthless.

 

The idea of being (or calling someone) virtuously worthless makes me laugh.

 

Mizzou is the Norm Crosby of NSBB, no?

Posted
general statement about moneyball guys.

 

Interesting point. :roll:

 

By the way, moneyball isn't about stats. It's about identifying weaknesses in the market and exploiting them. It's more about the economics of baseball. But I'm sure you already knew that; otherwise you'd just look silly talking about things you don't know.

 

You'd be better off using the term sabermetrician.

You're right about Moneyball, but there's a lot of people that fail to realize this. A lot of people just read Moneyball and, as a result, cling to OBP. What they fail to realize is that their Hero incorporated a lot of the things they criticize (defense, productive outs) into his philosophy a few years ago because he felt they were undervalued.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...