Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

What so evil about Mabry?

 

Based on his stats, he's been a perfectly serviceable bench player, and he's filled that role on this team. Calling him one of "Dusty's toys" a la Rusch or Neifi is simply incorrect.

  • Replies 264
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
New Trier is more White Sox fans than Cubs fans. When I pass by White Sox fans, they start going, "WHITE SOOOOOX!!" They do it to others too. They are rude, dumb, and obnoxious people. I hate their fans so much, I want to punch them in the face. Go ahead, I know you're going to say, I wouldn't make a trade w/ them unless they were getting fleeced. I don't care. This thread was meant for people who want to see the White Sox lose. Not a thread where I could spew my anti-White Sox venom.

 

Let's let it sink in.

 

And that last sentence in what I quoted makes zero sense given what we've seen time and time again when someone seemingly dares to even think of mentioning the White Sox on this board.

 

And having Mabry in your sig, under the reasoning you gave us, is ridiculous. Career-wise, Mabry has been a very solid bench player. He only got additional playing time when Lee was injured...other than that, we've seen him about as much as you'd expect to see a pinch hitter or guy subbing for someone hurt/have a day off. Pagan is infinitely more deserving to be up there with the time he's robbed Murton of thus far, thought neither he nor Mabry are even close to Neifi/Rusch-esque levels.

 

If you have ever read Moneyball, you have more than enough reason to hate John Mabry.

 

The guy is a dick.

 

You hate people because of Moneyball?

 

Works for Joe Morgan.

Posted
What so evil about Mabry?

 

Based on his stats, he's been a perfectly serviceable bench player, and he's filled that role on this team. Calling him one of "Dusty's toys" a la Rusch or Neifi is simply incorrect.

You want to make me a sig of what "Dusty's Toys" should be?? B/c I don't know how. I got it on another forum. If you want to make me one w/ Neifi, Rusch, Bynum, Pagan, and Nevin, go ahead.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Detroit and the Sox both lose tonight. Sox now 7.5 behind Detroit and only 1/2 ahead of the Yanks (1 ahead of Minnesota) for the wild card.

 

Gotta believe Kenny is frantically making calls.

Posted
Detroit and the Sox both lose tonight. Sox now 7.5 behind Detroit and only 1/2 ahead of the Yanks (1 ahead of Minnesota) for the wild card.

 

Gotta believe Kenny is frantically making calls.

 

Ever since Detroit started off hot and the White Sox had firm control of the Wild Card, I have maintained that both the Red Sox and Yankees would make the playoffs this year. The part of my prediction that is looking like it will end up incorrect is that I thought Detroit would slip and miss the playoffs while the White Sox win the AL Central.

 

But I do see two teams from the AL East getting in, or at least the Yankees. The Yankees are like the Braves, they've made the playoffs/won their division so many years in a row that I'm not going to count them out.

Posted
What so evil about Mabry?

 

Based on his stats, he's been a perfectly serviceable bench player, and he's filled that role on this team. Calling him one of "Dusty's toys" a la Rusch or Neifi is simply incorrect.

You want to make me a sig of what "Dusty's Toys" should be?? B/c I don't know how. I got it on another forum. If you want to make me one w/ Neifi, Rusch, Bynum, Pagan, and Nevin, go ahead.

 

Nevin shouldn't be in there, either.

Posted
What so evil about Mabry?

 

Based on his stats, he's been a perfectly serviceable bench player, and he's filled that role on this team. Calling him one of "Dusty's toys" a la Rusch or Neifi is simply incorrect.

You want to make me a sig of what "Dusty's Toys" should be?? B/c I don't know how. I got it on another forum. If you want to make me one w/ Neifi, Rusch, Bynum, Pagan, and Nevin, go ahead.

 

Nevin's 859 OPS since he joined the club is #2 on the team behind only Barrett.

Posted

 

By the way, way to roll into Iguchi, Marcus Thames.

 

I've been clicking back and forth between watching Mr. Can't Keep His Pitch Count Below 100 In Five Innings and the Indians-Tigers game. the ESPN guys were just talking about that play (Stone and Phillips I think) and about how Ozzie said it was a good clean play.

 

I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

Posted
Why is CubsBullsBears dislike for the White Sox so off-putting?

It's omnipresence?

Wouldn't it be easier to ignore than to goad then?

 

I agree. The guy hates the sox. a lot of us do. He started a thread for it. He's clearly not going to change. Let him have his thread. If it bothers people so much, ignore it. he's not breaking any rules.

Posted

 

By the way, way to roll into Iguchi, Marcus Thames.

 

I've been clicking back and forth between watching Mr. Can't Keep His Pitch Count Below 100 In Five Innings and the Indians-Tigers game. the ESPN guys were just talking about that play (Stone and Phillips I think) and about how Ozzie said it was a good clean play.

 

I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

Looked like a clean play to me. He was well within reach of the bag, didn't go in with his cleats, and no elbows were thrown.

Posted
I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

The other problem is, Ozzie is an idiot. He's a PR nightmare, and has never met a microphone he wouldn't talk to.

 

:?:

Posted
I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

The other problem is, Ozzie is an idiot. He's a PR nightmare, and has never met a microphone he wouldn't talk to.

 

:?:

Thank you.

 

Ozzie said it was clean? Ozzie thinks anything short of shivving the pitcher in the ribs is clean. He has talked openly about supporting "old time" cheating like spitting on the ball and other things.

 

WHICH IS TOTALLY AWESOME COS I AGREE WITH EVERY WORD

 

HEY THIS IS JI

 

JIM THOME

Posted
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gifhttp://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b102/TheG-Mantwinsrule/sweep.gif
Posted
I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

The other problem is, Ozzie is an idiot. He's a PR nightmare, and has never met a microphone he wouldn't talk to.

 

:?:

 

the explanation is really simple. he makes these caveats, yet argues how 'right' Ozzie is or how Ozzie is 'just stating the facts' or 'just telling it how it is'

 

in other words, he tries for best of both worlds. condemning Ozzie for the things Ozzie says, while at the same time argreeing with every word that comes out of Ozzie's mouth, no matter how absurd. the irony is he says Ozzie is an idiot, but if recollection of this forum is correct, he agrees with just about everything Ozzie says, even while condemning him for it.

Posted
I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

The other problem is, Ozzie is an idiot. He's a PR nightmare, and has never met a microphone he wouldn't talk to.

 

:?:

 

the explanation is really simple. he makes these caveats, yet argues how 'right' Ozzie is or how Ozzie is 'just stating the facts' or 'just telling it how it is'

 

in other words, he tries for best of both worlds. condemning Ozzie for the things Ozzie says, while at the same time argreeing with every word that comes out of Ozzie's mouth, no matter how absurd. the irony is he says Ozzie is an idiot, but if recollection of this forum is correct, he agrees with just about everything Ozzie says, even while condemning him for it.

If what you say is true, I just may be the smartest man alive. Condemning him, while, at the same time, agreeing with him. Agreeing, while condemning, BRILLIANT.

Posted
I am wondering how you reconcile your unwaivering support for just about everthing Ozzie says and your claim that Thames play was dirty.

 

The other problem is, Ozzie is an idiot. He's a PR nightmare, and has never met a microphone he wouldn't talk to.

 

:?:

 

the explanation is really simple. he makes these caveats, yet argues how 'right' Ozzie is or how Ozzie is 'just stating the facts' or 'just telling it how it is'

 

in other words, he tries for best of both worlds. condemning Ozzie for the things Ozzie says, while at the same time argreeing with every word that comes out of Ozzie's mouth, no matter how absurd. the irony is he says Ozzie is an idiot, but if recollection of this forum is correct, he agrees with just about everything Ozzie says, even while condemning him for it.

 

Yeah, this is pretty absurd and farfetched.

Posted
Let's shift the focus.

 

Point: The Sox have way too much talent to continue like this.

 

Counterpoint: Their schedule is INSANE.

 

Baltimore and KC isn't that insane. Luckily for the Sox, that could be right what the doctor ordered.

Posted
Ooh, can I start the official go Twins thread, or do I have to hate the Sox more than I care about everything important in life?

 

I was just going to say that the way the standings look now, a "Go Twins" thread seems more appropriate. Then again, the goings on of the AL Central have little to no effect on my everyday life, so why bother?

Posted
If we ever start a Go Royals thread, then you know the universe is about to end.

 

I've thought about it...but that was more for the Cubs' draft sake then anything else.

Posted
If we ever start a Go Royals thread, then you know the universe is about to end.

 

I've thought about it...but that was more for the Cubs' draft sake then anything else.

 

I've seen this mentioned a few times. Did they eliminate the alternating leagues get the #1 pick rule?

Posted
How about change this to GO TIGERS/TWINS/YANKEES/RED SOX!! And if the Blue Jays make a serious run, add them in too.

 

Sounds good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...