Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Old-Timey Member
Posted
i've missed the last half of the game. do my eyes deceive me or have the cubs been 0-3 the last three innings w/ the 'get the leadoff guy on and then bunt him over strategy'? i mean, seriously, how many times does it have to NOT work before you quit trying it?????? unreal!!!!!!!

 

I WON'T BELIEVE THE DATA UNTIL I SEE IT WITH MY OWN EYES

  • Replies 897
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I still love the Cubs.

 

But damn it, this is ridicilous.

 

How do you have your #3 hitter bunting with the guy on deck sitting at 0-4.

 

somaanambeeech.

Posted
JJ actually looks like he has a clue, not.

 

I wonder if anyone has told him he is opening his front side way to early.

 

I haven't heard a lot about Cubs coaching affecting any player's hitting.

 

Jon posted this in yesterday's game thread, though:

 

This will make someone on the board happy:
Cubs.com[/url]"]The reason for his resurgence? Zambrano has found a better, higher arm slot. He sat down with Rothschild and looked at video from a start last July against St. Louis' Chris Carpenter and discovered the difference.

 

"There was a big difference with my body," he said. "My outing against [Milwaukee], I was throwing with my arm only and wasn't using my body. When I'm using my legs and my body, everything's different because I can drive the ball where I want."

 

Rothschild lives!

 

The sad thing is JC and a few others had recognized this a while ago.

Posted (edited)

BOTTOM OF THE TENTH INNING

 

Bowen homered to right field

 

1 runs, 1 hits, 0 errors, 0 men left on base

 

              1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0      R H E
CUBS          0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0      1 9 0 
San Diego     0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1      2 7 0 

 

W: Cassidy (3-0)

S: none

L: Howry (2-1)

 

T: 3:17

A: 37,745

 

Home runs: CUBS: Ramirez (5), San Diego: Bowen (1)

 

pitcher     IP  H  R ER BB  K HR PIT
Marshall   6.0  3  1  1  3  6  0  90 
Novoa      1.3  1  0  0  0  0  0  23 
Eyre       0.7  1  0  0  0  1  0  17 
Howry      1.0  2  1  1  0  0  1  09 

Edited by Fred Hornkohl
Posted
This team has got worse every year for the past 3 now.

 

I cannot understand for the life of me how most of our management is still employed.

 

still employed WITH A DAMN EXTENSION

Old-Timey Member
Posted
JJ actually looks like he has a clue, not.

 

I wonder if anyone has told him he is opening his front side way to early.

 

I haven't heard a lot about Cubs coaching affecting any player's hitting.

 

Jon posted this in yesterday's game thread, though:

 

This will make someone on the board happy:
Cubs.com[/url]"]The reason for his resurgence? Zambrano has found a better, higher arm slot. He sat down with Rothschild and looked at video from a start last July against St. Louis' Chris Carpenter and discovered the difference.

 

"There was a big difference with my body," he said. "My outing against [Milwaukee], I was throwing with my arm only and wasn't using my body. When I'm using my legs and my body, everything's different because I can drive the ball where I want."

 

Rothschild lives!

 

The sad thing is JC and a few others had recognized this a while ago.

 

I'm just grateful someone out there finally recognized it, given the other blatant oversights.

Posted

 

actually, it does. of course, you still have to get a hit.

 

Do you have numbers for that?

 

BP did a study that showed pretty conclusively that the only good times to sac bunt when playing for one run are 1) when there are no outs and a runner on second and 2) when the pitcher (or someone who hits just as poorly as a pitcher - Neifi Perez for example) is batting.

 

does the bp "study" conclude a that runner usually scores from 1st on a single?

Old-Timey Member
Posted
And Marshall's streak ends right after Maddux's, though not due to any fault of Marshall's, obviously.
Posted
I can't even watch this team right now. The pitching has been excellent the last couple of games and I felt no threat of the Cubs scoring. I don't mean winning, I mean actually forcing a run across the plate. I can't imagine how frustrated everyone in that clubhouse must feel.
Old-Timey Member
Posted

 

actually, it does. of course, you still have to get a hit.

 

Do you have numbers for that?

 

BP did a study that showed pretty conclusively that the only good times to sac bunt when playing for one run are 1) when there are no outs and a runner on second and 2) when the pitcher (or someone who hits just as poorly as a pitcher - Neifi Perez for example) is batting.

 

does the bp "study" conclude a that runner usually scores from 1st on a single?

 

no

Posted

 

How do you have your #3 hitter bunting with the guy on deck sitting at 0-4.

 

somaanambeeech.

 

Completely absurd managing given the horrible slump our offense is in. Pretty dumb to waste an out at that moment, especially as you point, with a guy on deck who is 0-4 and pretty much sucks

Posted

 

actually, it does. of course, you still have to get a hit.

 

Do you have numbers for that?

 

BP did a study that showed pretty conclusively that the only good times to sac bunt when playing for one run are 1) when there are no outs and a runner on second and 2) when the pitcher (or someone who hits just as poorly as a pitcher - Neifi Perez for example) is batting.

 

does the bp "study" conclude a that runner usually scores from 1st on a single?

 

What are you talking about?

Posted

 

How do you have your #3 hitter bunting with the guy on deck sitting at 0-4.

 

somaanambeeech.

 

Completely absurd managing given the horrible slump our offense is in. Pretty dumb to waste an out at that moment, especially as you point, with a guy on deck who is 0-4 and pretty much sucks

 

Dust for brains continues to prove the fans right

Posted

 

actually, it does. of course, you still have to get a hit.

 

Do you have numbers for that?

 

BP did a study that showed pretty conclusively that the only good times to sac bunt when playing for one run are 1) when there are no outs and a runner on second and 2) when the pitcher (or someone who hits just as poorly as a pitcher - Neifi Perez for example) is batting.

 

Same study shows that bunting a runner to second with not outs increases your chances to score one run slightly. You generally don't want to do it because it significantly decreses your chances to score more than one.

 

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2851

 

Numbers in this study show pretty conclusively that it's a very good idea to bunt when playing for one run with a runner on second an no outs. It's usually a bad idea to sac bunt with a runner on first with no outs, even when playing for one run.

 

If you've got a different study that shows bunting a runner from 1st to 2nd raises probability of scoring one run, I'd genuinely like to see it. It's something that interests me.

Posted
There is no way that Hendry gives up three pitchers for Pierre only to bench him in early May. The pitching decisions (except for Rusch) have worked out for the most part. Almost all the blame belongs to the outfield acquisitions.
Posted
start the pie countdown

 

cedeno

walker

lee

aram

jones

murton

pie

barret

 

He's not ready. I'd rather see him work on his plate discipline, power and baserunning at AAA than come up with holes in his game and struggle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...