Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I know Guzman has only had two starts, but they were against two of the worst teams in baseball. He looked unimpressive (if not downright bad) in both of them. And it's not like the lineups (outside of Miguel Cabrera and Jason Bay) were all that tough.

 

I like the kid. He's got electirc stuff, but he can't control it. I think he'll be an effective starter one day, but today is not that day. He needs more time, period.

Recommended Posts

Posted
I know Guzman has only had two starts, but they were against two of the worst teams in baseball. He looked unimpressive (if not downright bad) in both of them. And it's not like the lineups (outside of Miguel Cabrera and Jason Bay) were all that tough.

 

I like the kid. He's got electirc stuff, but he can't control it. I think he'll be an effective starter one day, but today is not that day. He needs more time, period.

 

Lots of good pitchers looked like Guzman did in their debut (at times fantastic, at times out of control, but not in over his head).

Old-Timey Member
Posted

He's had two bad starts, that doesn't mean he's not ready for this level necessarily. It means that he has had two bad starts - nothing more.

 

Now if it's a month from now and he hasn't had a good start yet, then we can talk.

Posted
I know Guzman has only had two starts, but they were against two of the worst teams in baseball. He looked unimpressive (if not downright bad) in both of them. And it's not like the lineups (outside of Miguel Cabrera and Jason Bay) were all that tough.

 

I like the kid. He's got electirc stuff, but he can't control it. I think he'll be an effective starter one day, but today is not that day. He needs more time, period.

 

Lots of good pitchers looked like Guzman did in their debut (at times fantastic, at times out of control, but not in over his head).

 

While I agree with you, I never felt Gooz was ready given how he was pitching at Iowa. He's still rusty from throwing so few innings the past few seasons and recovering from the injuries.

Posted
yet another example of the closer a guy gets to Wrigley Field, the more he refuses to throw strikes?

 

Most pitchers' control gets worse as the pitch at higher levels, with better, more patient hitters at the higher level. This is especially so when they first reach a higher level.

 

I think it's more a case of a guy who's still working his way back from injuries.

Posted

Maddux got 5 starts in '86. He put up a 5.52 ERA with a 1.774 WHIP.

 

Guzman's a little worse after his first 2 starts...5.91 ERA and a 1.96 WHIP. He's given up 7 BBs and 2 HBP in 10.2 innings. His control in the minors has never been that bad. He has so far shown an ability to strike out more than a guy an inning, even with the control problems. I'm attributing this to a case of nerves (that's built up over 3 years thanks to injuries) for the time being. I like the idea of reevaluating when Wood comes up, see if he settles down after his 2nd or 3rd start.

Guest
Guests
Posted
After two starts, Marshall had all of 9 IP with a 7.71 ERA. I think it's a bit early to make any decisions about Guzman.
Old-Timey Member
Posted (edited)
Maddux got 5 starts in '86. He put up a 5.52 ERA with a 1.774 WHIP.

 

Guzman's a little worse after his first 2 starts...5.91 ERA and a 1.96 WHIP. He's given up 7 BBs and 2 HBP in 10.2 innings. His control in the minors has never been that bad. He has so far shown an ability to strike out more than a guy an inning, even with the control problems. I'm attributing this to a case of nerves (that's built up over 3 years thanks to injuries) for the time being. I like the idea of reevaluating when Wood comes up, see if he settles down after his 2nd or 3rd start.

I don't think it's necessarily nerves. He just hasn't regained his control yet, which wasn't that much better in Iowa. He may not have walked as many batters, but it resulted in a lot of deep counts and long ABs. Of course, he was having the same problem in the AFL.

 

Guzman with the Cubs:

87 pitches, 52 strikes

104 pitches (yeow), 70 strikes

 

total:

191 - 122 strikes, 69 balls

 

Guzman at AAA:

85 pitches, 54 strikes

103 pitches (yeow again), 63 strikes

95 pitches, 56 strikes

 

total:

283 - 173 strikes, 110 balls

 

And here are Hill's numbers, just for the heck of it:

 

Hill at AAA:

79 pitches, 54 strikes

91 pitches, 60 strikes

98 pitches, 61 strikes

98 pitches, 63 strikes

 

total:

366 - 238 strikes, 128 balls

Edited by Jon
Posted
I know Guzman has only had two starts, but they were against two of the worst teams in baseball. He looked unimpressive (if not downright bad) in both of them. And it's not like the lineups (outside of Miguel Cabrera and Jason Bay) were all that tough.

 

I like the kid. He's got electirc stuff, but he can't control it. I think he'll be an effective starter one day, but today is not that day. He needs more time, period.

 

Lots of good pitchers looked like Guzman did in their debut (at times fantastic, at times out of control, but not in over his head).

 

While I agree with you, I never felt Gooz was ready given how he was pitching at Iowa. He's still rusty from throwing so few innings the past few seasons and recovering from the injuries.

 

Ready is a relative term. Few pitchers are ready when they are brought up. They struggle early and develop.

He's 24 years old, he's got 300+ professional innings under his belt. He might be rusty and he might not be ready to start 32 games in the bigs, but he's as ready as any prospect to get some time starting. And he's only doing it for emergency purposes.

Posted

aardsma wasant ready for the big leagues, Guzman has the stuff, he just needs rothschild to convince him to use it

 

 

BTW if first impressions were everything, Ryne Sandberg would not be in the HOF after his 1-32 start

Posted
It isn't like he got absolutely shelled, he just had some control problems. Luckily he was missing out of the zone as opposed to over the plate. I think you can attribute his bad outings to big league jitters, and they'll go away. He's shown flashes of awesome stuff, and I think he can deliver, just give him time to grow into his role.
Posted
aardsma wasant ready for the big leagues, Guzman has the stuff, he just needs rothschild to convince him to use it

 

 

BTW if first impressions were everything, Ryne Sandberg would not be in the HOF after his 1-32 start

 

Aardsma has good stuff.

Verified Member
Posted
Christ, I'm just happy Guzman hasn't had a leg fall off or something. I'll take my chances with him as long as he simply can still pitch...
Posted
When (if?) Wood and Prior return, should the Cubs return Guzman to Iowa or keep him in long relief, like they did with Zambrano early in his career?
Posted
Maddux got 5 starts in '86. He put up a 5.52 ERA with a 1.774 WHIP.

 

Guzman's a little worse after his first 2 starts...5.91 ERA and a 1.96 WHIP. He's given up 7 BBs and 2 HBP in 10.2 innings. His control in the minors has never been that bad. He has so far shown an ability to strike out more than a guy an inning, even with the control problems. I'm attributing this to a case of nerves (that's built up over 3 years thanks to injuries) for the time being. I like the idea of reevaluating when Wood comes up, see if he settles down after his 2nd or 3rd start.

I don't think it's necessarily nerves. He just hasn't regained his control yet, which wasn't that much better in Iowa. He may not have walked as many batters, but it resulted in a lot of deep counts and long ABs. Of course, he was having the same problem in the AFL.

 

Guzman with the Cubs:

87 pitches, 52 strikes

104 pitches (yeow), 70 strikes

 

total:

191 - 122 strikes, 69 balls

 

Guzman at AAA:

85 pitches, 54 strikes

103 pitches (yeow again), 63 strikes

95 pitches, 56 strikes

 

total:

283 - 173 strikes, 110 balls

 

And here are Hill's numbers, just for the heck of it:

 

Hill at AAA:

79 pitches, 54 strikes

91 pitches, 60 strikes

98 pitches, 61 strikes

98 pitches, 63 strikes

 

total:

366 - 238 strikes, 128 balls

 

That's about a 64% ratio of strikes to pitches thrown for Guzman, while Hill is at 65%. That's really not that bad of control on either part. I don't Guzman's problem is control, he can throw his share of strikes. He's thinking too much. When he gets ahead of someone, he starts picking the corners and missing. There are some momentary bouts of wildness, but overall, it appeared to me like he's trying to hard to make the perfect pitch with 3 strikes and he ends up running up his pitch totals and even giving a few walks away. Either that, or he's doing the same thing if he gets behind 1-0 or 2-0 in the count. I can't read his mind of course, but I think he's trying to hard to pitch like a finesse pitcher rather than pitching like a power pitcher with nasty stuff like we know he can.

Posted
When (if?) Wood and Prior return, should the Cubs return Guzman to Iowa or keep him in long relief, like they did with Zambrano early in his career?
I hope they send him back to Iowa to start. As much time as he missed the past few years, I think he needs regular action, not pitching out of the bullpen.
Old-Timey Member
Posted
Christ, I'm just happy Guzman hasn't had a leg fall off or something. I'll take my chances with him as long as he simply can still pitch...

 

Haha. Sad but true. It really has come to that, at least until we get Woody & Prior back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...