No offense to you, but this seems like lazy narrative. Easy to suggest the team is a move short so that when the season ends and they don’t win the WS (which 29 teams can all say) we can look back and agree they were short. This off season was not like last off season. Cubs actually didn’t hold money up. They spent and put a very good team on the field. Maybe they could have added a lock down pen arm, but historically they don’t really do that. I don’t think the FO believes that is what they need to do. Last year they absolutely were short a move they should have made. They had the money and the need. This year they spent the money and really they don’t have an obvious need. There isn’t one move that’s going to make them better than the Dodgers. Most likely they fall short. As I said, 29 teams do just that. But, IMO, this off season was not really like last year. Based on what they were allowed to spend I think the FO did a good job. And I am also happy ownership allowed an increase in spending. They are not exactly a high spending team, but at least they opened the wallet a bit more. They are just never going to be the Dodgers, Mets or Yankees in spending.