Rcal10
-
Posts
6,980 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Rcal10
-
I agree. Wasn’t sure when this BP was done. Just glad it wasn’t in spring training. I want nothing to do with Bauer.
-
What is this with Bauer?
-
Looks like this is the team. I don’t see any major league roster moves any longer. It would have been nice to get Gallen, but not for the one year. So this is the team. I think it is a roster that could/should be another 90 win team. Obviously, anything can happen, but on paper they look pretty solid. Probably the 2nd or 3rd best roster in the NL. And the best in the central.
-
Deferring the money instead of getting it all now is not a win for the player. Maybe the plus for Gallen is next year he isn’t attached to a QO. That is about it.
-
I only mention that because many people were concerned if the Cubs traded Shaw they could sign someone who could be just as good as him next year. I think Rengifo could be.
-
Brewers signed Rengifo. Would it surprise anyone if he had a better year than Shaw as a utility player? It wouldn’t surprise me.
-
He was pretty confident in a Cubs trade for Pablo Lopez last year. And that never happened.
-
I don’t think it does. But, I doubt the Cubs were getting Gallen anyway. To me this moves doesn’t lessen the chance of Gallen.
-
I get it. He may never catch. But what happened with Schwarber doesn’t mean it will happen with Mo. As many have now pointed out, it appears the Cubs haven’t made that decision. So why do a handful of fans know better? That was all I was saying and what ithers have repeated.
-
I doubt the Cubs agree with you on Mo. For starters, I doubt he plays much first base. He is too short. Next, if all the Cubs envisioned with Mo is a DH who might put up decent offensive numbers I would think he would have been someone they would have been okay trading. I think the FO still believes he could catch. Maybe not 110 games or so, but maybe 60 or more. A back up catcher/ DH is way more valuable than just DH. Seems during trade discussions the Cubs viewed him very highly. He very well could end up just a DH. But I think your decision on him is very premature.
-
If Mo can learn as much in the majors as in the minors.catching everyday, I agree with you. Only advantage Tauchman, or any left handed bat they add, would be allowing Mo to catch at Iowa. They are not bringing in some guy who will clearly outhit Mo, IMO. A lefty bat would only be so Mo can learn by catching everyday. And maybe he can learn as much on the major league roster. 🤷
-
If Alcantara beats out McCormick and Carlson, Tauchman isn’t hindering Alcantara at all. Right now the team seems to be leaning in to Mo as the DH. Or at least it appears they want a left handed bat. So if they got Tauchman he would be taking MO’s spot. He would be that left handed bat instead of Mo.
-
I could see the Cubs doing something in the neighborhood or 3/$63M. But the sticking point is the first year opt out. I doubt they do that. Maybe opt out after 2 years. Maybe a 3rd year for $21M or a $4M opt out. That would guarantee Gallen 2/$46M. He might take that.
-
At this point I think with Mo it is about where he will get better at catcher than it is finding a guy who will be “odds on” better than him. A guy like Tauchman makes some sense, IMO. They would have their regular 8 guys then a bench if the back up catcher, Shaw, Austin, Tauchman and whoever comes out of the battle for the last spot (Carlson, Chas, or Alcantara). Maybe even a surprise guy. Taichman might not outhit Mo, but he could play right instead of Seiya. So that helps them defensively. So if he hits a bit, even similar to last year, he would help them. And if they think Mo learns more about catching at Iowa, it helps Mo in the future. I think they are done, but I wouldn’t mind Tauchman.
-
I’m less worried about Mo hitting then I am maximizing his value in the future. If, by going to Iowa, he can become a decent catcher and turn into a 60-90 games a year catcher, I wouldn’t mind him being in Iowa and the Cubs get someone else like Lowe to DH, against a right handed pitcher. I know some have suggested he might learn more on the major league roster. If that is true, I am fine with him as the DH. I think he will be a good offensive player. Maybe even a guy who post 115. Whatever they end up doing with him, I hope after this year he catches more often.
-
I saw $243M. I don’t think they are at $265M.
-
I don’t think they are at $265M right now.
-
In an effort to post something that doesn’t age well, I will say I believe we are done for the off season. I think what we see is what we get. Maybe a minor league signing, but that is it. I don’t think Gallen or any other major leaguer will be added. Now, really hope this one comes back me soon.😅
-
Now I’m confused. I took south of Racine to mean south of the town of Racine.🤷😓
-
I think Gallen would fit with the 3 you mentioned to perform at a high level. That is why I would want him. Then you can get 3 of those 4, which gives you a better chance of actually getting 3 with high level performances.
-
I think the only way him opting out after one year and the Cubs losing a draft pick works is if they win the WS next year and he pitches well. Which is why I don’t see the Cubs allowing an opt out after 1 year. They didn’t with Imai, I doubt they do with Gallen. Imai only cost the posting fee. And they didn’t do it. Don’t see them being ok with losing a second round pick.
-
I agree. But I think his terms would be a one year opt out. And I don’t think the Cubs want to do that. I would rather just do a straight 4/$82M deal and no opt outs. Something like that. But if that isnt enough money for him, I’m not sure how much further the Cubs should go. That is why I say a deal with an opt out after 2 years is the best option. I wouldn’t sign him with a 1 year opt out. They lose him after 1, and a second round pick. I don’t like that idea.
-
Did you mean to quote me with your response? Because I agree with you. Usually I would expect your comment to be after someone suggested Taillon will be better than Gallen.
-
Entertainment is absolutely geared to a younger crowd. That doesn’t necessarily mean if someone is older they can’t enjoy it too. But generally the demographic entertainment is targeting is younger than you at 51 and me, at 65. I think both Kendrick and BB had good shows. I liked BB music. I would have liked Lenrick better had I understood everything he was again and also knew some back story on his performance. But, visually his was also entertaining.
-
If you stopped watching 2 decades ago that tells me the halftime show isn’t for your demographic anyway. Mine neither. I have learned to just realize no one cares what the older people think. They are there to entertain people under 30. It looked to me like BB did that.
