soccer10k

Or if you have MLB.TV.

BAD idea for Aram. How do you think the fans in the Bronx would like Aram casually jogging the bases? How about the NY media? If he thinks he gets a lot of guff in Chicago for not hustling somebody should remind him it would be a thousand times worse in New York. Based on the way they have treated ARod and what they have reported, I think the New York media would be much more focused on ARam's 6 HR's and 8 RBI's over the last 5 games to care about his hustle. EDIT: I do see your point though.

What (if any) downside do you see to Prior throwing 116 pitches in game 2? Just curious. That he stayed in 2 innings too long in a blowout win. What better time to give your bullpen a little work, especially with an day off the following day, than in a blowout? My main argument that it wasn't that one game that killed Prior, it was the whole season of being overworked and September in particular. As I said before, Prior also had 5 days off in between Games 2 and 6. If Prior wore down in Game 6, it wasn't 116 pitches in Game 2 that caused it. A lost opportunity to give the bullpen some work? Is that honestly the only downside you see to having Prior throw 116 pitches? To him it was valid, b/c he had an extra day and had been throwing 120 pitches every start. No, you are misunderstanding my point. I am not saying that the 116 pitches Prior threw in Game 2 shouldn't matter because he should be used to it since he averaged 113 pitches during the regular season. I am saying that claiming Prior ran out of gas in Game 6 on five days rest rather than four after throwing 116 pitches in Game 2 is just wrong. He is much more likely to have worn out in the eighth inning due to the whole season of being overworked as well as (as Monco pointed out) throwing 119 pitches in Game 6. If Prior had pitched in Game 6 on three days rest, or even four, then you could use the extra 30 pitches as a legitimate argument. But to claim that Prior wore down in Game 6 because of one game is ridiculous.

I'm joining you in this camp. It sounds like he has a good grip on things. He seems to know what makes up a good hitter and when is the right/wrong time to take a pitcher out of a ball game. I'm not so sure he's interested though.

how? The only quote that looks particularly egregious is the first one, and if you consider the question was likely "Aramis, you hit very well this afternoon, what are your thoughts on the loss today?" even that is a fine response. Couldn't agree with you more. There isn't any context for the quotes and we don't know how he said it or his facial expressions while he spoke. They might have cut out parts of each quote as well to make it fit better in the article. I hope ARam doesn't go anywhere unless it's to NYY for ARod.

He'll be facing Jeff Weaver as per Cubs.com. This could be an entertaining game to watch as it could be a high scoring affair - especially if the wind is blowing out. EDIT: If there is another thread on this feel free to lock this one.

Any word on if Marmol will be missing a start.

I would kill to be watching the 2004 Cubs right now. Yeah, back when we had a shot at winning.

Prior is under contract for next year so I see no reason to not bring him back unless we get a good deal in a trade. As for Wood, unless he wants to sign a one year, incentive laden deal starting in the $3-4 mil range, he can go elsewhere. I'm done caring about him.

Maybe it's just me, or maybe because the Cubs suck, but it seems like Novoa is the "stop the bleeding" guy. When a starter is getting worked over in the middle innings and needs to be removed, Novoa seemed like the guy who always came in. Again, this view may be skewed because the Cubs are usually losing but I rarely see Novoa in the later innings.

This game starts at 7:10 Eastern Time and will be televised on WGN. I, for one, will be watching solely because of Z.

I keep wondering how a guy can hit 291 and only have an OBP of 319. I watched Brad Wilkerson tonight who is slumping badly. He's hitting 234, but his OBP is still higher than Jones. Even against righties, which Jacque hits better, his isoD is only .030. No matter how you slice it he gets on base by hitting the ball, not walking.

While I agree with your thought process, I find it hard to lump Maddux (a hall of fame 300+ winning pitcher) in with the rest of those scrubs. Pierre has been playing really well as of late and Maddux numbers aren't bad for a projected 5th starter. pierre was absolutely worthless the first three months or whatever of the season. it's so nice of him to turn it on now that the cubs are 25 games under .500 so he can salvage a nice contract out of the whole ordeal. maddux is not being paid like a 5th starter, and his performance over the past three months has fallen below what you'd want out of a fifth starter. no matter how you slice it, those two have hurt the cubs this year much more than rich hill has. yet baker is acting as though he's at the end of his rope w/ hill. Even if Pierre played well I highly doubt it would have had much of an effect on the Cubs record this year. Maddux has the 29th best ERA in the NL this year which would put him in at a low #2/ high #3 and the 16th best WHIP in the NL. I would hardly consider that to be numbers "below what you'd want out of a fifth starter."

Marshall has shown the ability to get people out at the ML level and has made numerous quality starts this year. Obviously not every young pitcher is going to pitch like Jered Weaver or Liriano, but I want to see some progress which is what Marshall has shown at points this year. Has he had his setbacks? Of course. Most young pitchers do. But Hill hasn't shown any progress. Again, how could you possibly percieve "progress" or "regression" in only FOUR CONSECUTIVE STARTS!? Why couldn't you? If you are making the same mistakes for 4 straight startsl then you aren't exactly making progress right? "sample size". Heard of it? Give him more than "you there! Succeed at the major league level in 4 starts or you're GONE!!". . "BTW be more like Marshall, he's good" (when he's not THAT good). . Hill has dominated AAA. He is ready to be a major leaguer. Now is the time to let him get over his lumps. It would be incredibly stupid if the Cubs only gave him 1 or 2 starts before they start pressuring him to do better. In a better organization, Rich Hill might be pictching with a 3.00 ERA by now. I have no doubt. If Hill has a 9.00 ERA after 10 starts, I might start to lean your way. But not after 4. BTW if this (your position on Hill) is what Hill has to deal with in Dusty and Rothy then I can understand why he has mental problems pitching on the Cubs. What about after 8 starts - which is how many he has at the ML level?

This doesn't really bother me at all. Lee hasn't looked completely healthy since he came back and I was tired of having him sit on the bench seemingly every other day. I wouldn't mind seeing Lee shut it down for the rest of the year to ensure he is healthy next year.

Not only did Dempster not blow the save, he got the Mets out 1-2-3.

JACQUE!!

I did. Don't make things personal. I'll try my best to not make things personal seeing as I don't like when people make personal attacks at me. But in this case though, I feel that I just blatently said what everybody else was thinking and, in many cases, what some people implied with their responses to his posts. I don't really see much of a difference in the two ways of going about dealing with the issue at hand. I'm not going to debate your reason for doing so. I wish I'd stepped in sooner in this thread in hindsight, but I'm doing so now. It's done. Do not make things personal again. Please. As long as everybody is treated equally, which I believe everybody is, I could care less. I won't make things personal again.

I did. Don't make things personal. I'll try my best to not make things personal seeing as I don't like when people make personal attacks at me. But in this case though, I feel that I just blatently said what everybody else was thinking and, in many cases, what some people implied with their responses to his posts. I don't really see much of a difference in the two ways of going about dealing with the issue at hand.

It's unlikely that I will be watching this game.

It's omnipresence? Wouldn't it be easier to ignore than to goad then? I think people are trying to show how wildly irrational it is rather than egging him on. That's not the way I read it. Not only does he make so many comments that are off base and blatently wrong, but he doesn't even back up his statements with any sort of a valid argument whatsoever. He also seems to bring up the White Sox in every single post he makes. And I'm not talking about this thread since it's obviously going to be AL Central centered but most other threads. It is very tiresome. Ignore him, then. Those song lyrics you posted certainly don't help. You didn't have to delete them. The song explains perfectly the type of person he is.

You and Pedro are drinking from the same Kool Aid, and its apparently spiked with Angel Dust. I thought it was clear I was being facetious. If I can't tell if you're joking, I just assume you are.

A) Because the Cubs have to make a decision on Hill soon, due to his age. 3 or 4 starts isn't enough time to make that decision. B) Those other guys have time. C) Those other guys have injury issues that don't need to be rushed. D) There's nothing to say other people can't start along with Hill. Marmol and Marshall are hurt. Zambrano has pitched too much. Maddux should be gone. Prior is day-to-day. Hill can pitch every 5 days and you could still find space for other guys. Zambrano and Maddux are still there. Z isn't going to be shut down. I'm all for trading Maddux as well. The Cubs are also giving Prior a shot to show what he can do. There are three spots in the rotation and frankly, I don't care which guy makes those starts as long as his name isn't Glendon Rusch. Since there will be two spots open, something I forgot about until you mentioned Marmol so thank you for reminding me of that, let Hill start for a while. I would personally rather have Guzman starting over Hill, and was under the impression there was only one spot open, but I would like both starting over Gopher Ball.

Marshall has shown the ability to get people out at the ML level and has made numerous quality starts this year. Obviously not every young pitcher is going to pitch like Jered Weaver or Liriano, but I want to see some progress which is what Marshall has shown at points this year. Has he had his setbacks? Of course. Most young pitchers do. But Hill hasn't shown any progress.

How does that make any sense whatsoever? Since when is 4 starts a reasonable opportunity? Marshall showed progress at one point, but he's shown regression at others. That's perfectly normal. It doesn't really what he gave up in his first 4, middle 4 or last 4 starts. What matters is that he got a lot more than 4 starts, and that they were consecutive. Hill needs to start every 5 days from here on out no matter what the results are. It doesn't matter if the Cubs win or lose, so there is nothing to lose if he gets shelled repeatedly. They need to get a good judgement on the guy, and 4 starts is not enough. If Hill gets 3 or 4 starts this time up with the team and gets shelled each time, why continue to send him out every 5 days? Why not give somebody else a chance maybe Guzman or Ryu? I'm all for giving guys a chance but Hill hasn't shown the ability to get anybody out; and not just this year, but last year as well. At least Guzman has shown the ability to get people out at some point in his short ML career. And Ryu only got one start so we don't know what he can do either. Fact is, Hill has gotten shelled and he shouldn't continue to get chance after chance if he continues to get hit hard.