Jump to content
North Side Baseball

soccer10k

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    26,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by soccer10k

  1. You answered your own question. The winner wins the Pac-10 and will, at the very least, go to the Rose Bowl.
  2. I am making a bold prediction right now. Ohio St will beat anyone they play by 3 tds, unless its Michigan. In some sort of sick way I hope they do play Rutgers. I dont know if the pass interference play was called correctly. I do know that the defender had his back turned and was slapping at Manningham's hands. If he by chance didnt hit one he was lucky because he sure was trying to interfere. I dont think the refereeing made any difference in the outcome of the game. I think that there was some not so great calls both ways but the difference in the game if you ask me is that Troy Smith played better than Henne. It wasnt that Henne played bad but Smith was Heismanesgue. You can just hand the Heisman to Smith now. It's not even going to be close. McFadden's a heck of a player----I'd put him second ahead of Quinn. But I'd be suprised if those two combined get the votes Smith will. He romped in two games against challenging #2 teams. That's the definition of Heisman Trophy winner. Yeah, barring Quinn throwing for 500 yards and 5 TD's against USC next week, Smith has the Heisman wrapped up. Not that I think he should win the Heisman, but he will.
  3. GO RUTGERS!!!
  4. But if contact is made and the defender has their back to the play, they are going to call it every time. There was contact? It looked like they brushed hands at best. He prevented Manningham from coming to the ball. That's interference. not if the Manningham doesn't come back for the ball and there is contact, unless he fact guards, which he didn't do. He didn't face guard him? What he did pretty much defines face guarding, he wasn't looking for the ball and making a play on the receiver. The ball hit him in the shoulder to boot. faceguarding has to do with the hands, ie. putting your hands up trying obstruct the view of the receiver without turning around and looking for the ball. the DB never got his hands up. in fact, the ball hit the DB in the hand down by the waste. I'm looking at it on Tivo, and that's exactly how it happened. Faceguarding has to do with looking at the receiver and never looking at the ball. You aren't looking to make a play on the ball you are looking to prevent the wide receiver from making a play on the ball.
  5. Ha, they have security guarding the uprights.
  6. OSU will be playing on January 8, 2007.
  7. But if contact is made and the defender has their back to the play, they are going to call it every time. There was contact? It looked like they brushed hands at best. He prevented Manningham from coming to the ball. That's interference. Manningham made no effort/wasn't able to come back to the ball. If he did, there would have been contact. It looked to me like he got a hand on the ball.
  8. Cuse, if you read this, I would just like to warn you to not listen to anything on SportsCenter regarding UM/OSU because you aren't going to like what you hear. There will be talk of a "classic" matchup and likely a game between "two great offenses". It will basically be the complete opposite of the talk after the Louisville/WVU game. Just watch, I guarantee it.
  9. But if contact is made and the defender has their back to the play, they are going to call it every time. There was contact? It looked like they brushed hands at best. He prevented Manningham from coming to the ball. That's interference.
  10. And Michigan will catch a break on a PI call on 4th down.
  11. GO CAL! I'm with you. I'm going to see if they can turn the game on down at the paper when I go to work at 6. I think they get basic cable - my editor had the World Series games on FOX a few weeks ago. We'll see though.
  12. Meanwhile, it's just one hour until Cal gets a chance to win a berth in the Rose Bowl against USC later.
  13. Another turnover by OSU. They're trying to choke away the game.
  14. When should I book his plane tickets for Oakland?
  15. Dude just can't catch a break. I don't know if saying he "can't catch a break" is the right thing to say in this situation. sar·casm n. 1. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule. Thank you. I know what sarcasm is. Obviously, as is not very hard to realize, it is sometimes difficult to detect sarcasm in the written word.
  16. UC Davis gets a 44 yard interception return for a touchdown to tie the game at 13. Good thing the defense is making plays because our offense is pathetic right now.
  17. With OSU receiving in the second half, this game could be over early in the third quarter.
  18. OSU has over 300 yards of offense in the first half.
  19. According to ESPN the Missouri game is over.
  20. 21-14 UM.
  21. I think Lloyd Carr left his defense in Ann Arbor.
  22. Dude just can't catch a break. I don't know if saying he "can't catch a break" is the right thing to say in this situation.
  23. Never heard of the "roughing the center" penalty before.
  24. Chad Henne is a... I think I'm going to watch that video again.
×
×
  • Create New...