Jump to content
North Side Baseball

soccer10k

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    26,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by soccer10k

  1. Better than the Big 12.
  2. USF has to get a first down still. There's your first down. And even if they didn't get one, White would have had to throw the ball and go around 80 yards to win. Not likely.
  3. South Carolina's going to beat Clemson.
  4. WVU is going down.
  5. Yet they can't against SF. It's pretty funny to watch a club like WVU, who once tried to convince the nation of their national title credentials, struggle with a ballclub like South Florida. The fact that they are just illustrates that the Big East is a small time conference parading as one of the big boys. I'm not sure how you can take any conference game and prove anything. Florida and SC did the same thing several weeks ago-did that prove the SEC was a small time conference? The only way you can really measure a conference is their non-conference play-the Big East was good against that, but very unproven at the same time (lots of wins, bad competition). It's all a matter of perspective-you can take this game and say the Big East isn't very good, or you can take the same result and show how the conference is deep enough that the middle teams can beat the top teams. It's very hard to tell which of those interpretations is really the correct one. BTW, South Florida up 21-12 now. No, I feel quite safe in saying that South Carolina is far superior competition to a school such as USF. Plus this game is for all the marbles for WVU. There's nothing to overlook. This is it. Except for the fact that they play Rutgers next week. Louisville has 1 conference loss and what *looks* to be an easy schedule to close the season. And your point is? Louisville beat WVU so they hold the tiebreaker anyway. If both win out Louisville wins the conference.
  6. Yet they can't against SF. It's pretty funny to watch a club like WVU, who once tried to convince the nation of their national title credentials, struggle with a ballclub like South Florida. The fact that they are just illustrates that the Big East is a small time conference parading as one of the big boys. I'm not sure how you can take any conference game and prove anything. Florida and SC did the same thing several weeks ago-did that prove the SEC was a small time conference? The only way you can really measure a conference is their non-conference play-the Big East was good against that, but very unproven at the same time (lots of wins, bad competition). It's all a matter of perspective-you can take this game and say the Big East isn't very good, or you can take the same result and show how the conference is deep enough that the middle teams can beat the top teams. It's very hard to tell which of those interpretations is really the correct one. BTW, South Florida up 21-12 now. No, I feel quite safe in saying that South Carolina is far superior competition to a school such as USF. Plus this game is for all the marbles for WVU. There's nothing to overlook. This is it. Except for the fact that they play Rutgers next week.
  7. I have my doubts about Florida as a National Title contender.
  8. Yet they can't against SF. It's pretty funny to watch a club like WVU, who once tried to convince the nation of their national title credentials, struggle with a ballclub like South Florida. The fact that they are just illustrates that the Big East is a small time conference parading as one of the big boys. Don't start this again.
  9. I would also. I think Smith, Quinn, and McFadden are definitely going to New York, and Slaton is likely to go. I'm not sure who would be the 5th right now though as there are several candidates on the next level. They don't have to invite 5 players for the ceremony. Only Bush, Young, and Leinart were invited last year. I think the candidates are weak enough for them to invite a 5th person-I think they only invited 3 last year because vitually no one had anybody but those 3 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. I think some other names could get some top 3 votes this year, and so there will be a 5th invited-I'm just not sure who (Hart/Rice/Calvin Johnson/others). I agree they probably will. I was just saying that they don't necessarily have to invite 5. As for an extra candidate, try Colt Brennan.
  10. I would also. I think Smith, Quinn, and McFadden are definitely going to New York, and Slaton is likely to go. I'm not sure who would be the 5th right now though as there are several candidates on the next level. They don't have to invite 5 players for the ceremony. Only Bush, Young, and Leinart were invited last year.
  11. USC's defense is better than last years version.
  12. Same here and I wear it proudly.
  13. The Cubs will win, and lose, somewhere between 0 and 162 games in 2007 (just regular season).
  14. GO TROJANS!!!
  15. Zito and Boras probably laugh at 5/60. If the Cubs are serious, $12M per year isn't going to get it done. Not even close.
  16. Already did.
  17. Arkansas should have tried to run the ball on first and second down. They know Dick is having a horrible day and you know McFadden could break one on any play. You have to try it at least.
  18. Russell will be short and Arkansas will get the ball back.
  19. Actually I don't know what that feels like, would you care to inform me? and all that followed in that discussion. Army being rated higher than U of I should play any role in comparing two teams SOS. there's two right there. I can't believe you actually spent the time to look up one statement about the Bears. I'm not even going to waste my time discussing Grossman right now. And I'm unclear on how the second statement is supposed to read because Army isn't rated higher than Indiana. I think you are playing dumb. you know damn well that it was more than one statement about Grossman and you were pretty much dead wrong about him, and you know damn well the point I was making about Army v. Indiana. fine. make it Army and one of UWs nonconference teams. I know I made multiple statements about Grossman but those happened 2 months ago. That's my point. And I don't know the point you are trying to make about Army v Indiana because of the way you wrote it. You know, since what you said and what you wanted to say were two different things. This time, I'm serious. I'm not responding to you on this subject again.
  20. What is going on right now?
  21. I think I may have spoke too soon. I'll shutup now.
  22. I think I may have spoke too soon.
  23. Arkansas might be in trouble now.
  24. Or just run the ball straight up. I'm confused as to why, with 12 minutes left in the game, Arkansas is throwing the ball. They have plenty of time left.
  25. Horrible throw. Actually, on a second look, that ball should have been caught by the receiver.
×
×
  • Create New...