You're totally missing the point of his post... because there is no point, you can't compare a part time player to a guy that has put up good numbers on a consistent basis. But CPatt isn't comparing a part-time player to a player that has put up good numbers consistently (because Juan Pierre hasn't put up good numbers consistently). .355 career OBP doesn't meet your criteria of good numbers? #-o You said consistently. Last year, he had a .326 OBP - not very consistent with his career OBP, is it? Hey, last year, his SLG was below his career OBP. I would rather take a chance on a guy that has been better on a consistent basis and chalk it off to 1 bad year, than go with a guy that has a consistent .334 OBP, with a history of injuries. I would rather go with neither. Why must the Cubs settle for guys who posted OBPs of .326 and .334 to solve the leadoff position when there are better candidates available?