Do they actually think Culpepper would be better for them than Leftwich or Garrard? I know Jacksonville has QB issues, but this move just seems to crowd things without solving anything. I would think he stands a good chance of being better than both. Fully healthy I would agree. But there seems to be quite a bit of concern over whether that knee is healthy. I'm not that big a Leftwich or Garrard fan (though I think both are decent), but an injured Culpepper is not an upgrade. Last year's stats (Culpepper injured, Leftwich benched, Garrard starting): Culpepper - 4 games, 60% completion percentage, 6.9 yards/attempt, 2 TDs 3 INT Leftwich - 6 games, 59% completion percentage, 6.3 y/a, 7 TDs 5 INT Garrard - 11 games, 60% completion percentage, 7.2 y/a, 10 TDs 9 INT Fairly similar numbers last year, but what startles me is the TD/INT ratio. Culpepper didn't throw many of either last season, but the year before he had 6 TDs and 12 INTs. Leftwich on the other hand had 15 TDs and 5 INTs. So, if healthy, Culpepper is an upgrade (not sure how much, but he is). If injured, he's as bad as them and maybe worse. If the Dolphins cut him, there's no reason the Jags shouldn't grab him, but I wouldn't trade anything for him - especially if I had to pay $5.5M for him (which the Jags will have to do in a trade).