I went with Pierre. Some of these guys, like Hundley and Blauser, were disappointing, but predictably bad (Hundley in Chicago was very similar to most of his non-peak years, Blauser's time in Chicago was practically a mirror image of 3 of his previous 4 seasons), but all these guys cost was money. Pierre, on the other hand, cost money and prospects. He was predictably terrible, but the Cubs went out of their way to acquire him because of an over-the-top misguided desire to find a stereotypical leadoff man. Even though he was only here for 1 year, he pretty much defines the wasted opportunity that has been the Jim Hendry era Cubs.