Jump to content
North Side Baseball

jersey cubs fan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    67,897
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by jersey cubs fan

  1. Why have the Cubs had the last pick in a couple rounds? Did Anaheim lose their rights to the pick in those rounds?
  2. How? If someone gets hurt, the Cubs can replace them with someone of the same position. Recently, when Miles went to the DL, Scales came right back up after being sent down. I believe he didn't even leave Chicago. He was talking about a day to day injury, not a DLing. If it gets to that point, then you insist that Patton takes a phantom DL stint and call the guy back up.
  3. As a catcher named Dick Jones from the Citadel I was certain we'd hear something about the guy having tremendous grit and drive or something.
  4. Probably from his Theriot like baserunning gaffes. However, if he was ever your favorite Cub, than maybe the stupid label is misapplied.
  5. http://www.herald-review.com/articles/2008/06/30/preps/baseball/1033766.txt
  6. Maybe, but the only one I see them going over slot will likely be Raley at this point. What kind of tough to sign best available guys are still around?
  7. Multiple guys who went to high school in northern climates, no?
  8. Is this looking like a draft where they go cheap with Colvin Jr. in the first and spend a little more on some of these later guys?
  9. I like what they say about this Raley guy. I assume as a "safe" pitcher with seemingly little upside, he'd be signable, is that the case? No harm in going safe after a guy who could slot into a rotation cheaply for a couple years.
  10. Is it too cynical of me to have the impression that the Cubs drafted these lefties in response to their frustrations finding lefties in the bullpen? Rusin seems like a decent enough pitcher though. Could he be a little bit of Ted Lilly?
  11. It's really the road games where he could be helpful, with the DH. And he's eligible to be called back up for that since it will have been over 10 days by then. But he can be useful in every game between now and then, as he's been useful since being called up. This team can't hit worth a crap, and they have no bench. Having a guy like Fox as your first bat off the bench every game is extremely useful.
  12. And there lies the problem with this organization. They won't cut ties when it's apparent that the player they signed is no longer capable of doing the job. No siree, they won't admit to making a mistake. Of course, the Cubs never admit making mistakes, or so they say. Except for when they're paying Marquis, Gaudin, and Vizcaino like 80 million dollars to not pitch for us. They signed Gaudin to a new deal this year and cut him. The fact that he has a 2nd year is more or less meaningless to the debate about whether or not they should cut him. He would hardly be the first guy cut with a year left on his deal. They won't do it because Hendry is a fool who sees value in a guy like Aaron Miles because he plays the game the right way, which is to say, really poorly. It's not because you can't justify cutting a guy who has a 2nd year on his contract.
  13. The Cubs do not need any more habadasherers.
  14. Yeah whatever Mr. Equality, if it offends you so much I'll quit. "Tomy, can ya hear me"? (The Who) Mr. Equality?
  15. They wouldn't really be stuck with 1 backup MI. They would always have the option of throwing Fox at third for a game and moving Fontenot back over to 2nd. The biggest problem on this team, by far, has been the lack of hitting. Fox is hitting, there's really no excuse for this move.
  16. I'm not going to get my panties all in a bunch over draft choices the day after, because we really have no idea how these guys will pan out, but quotes like these are so annoying to see from the Cubs. Why can't we ever see Wilken say things like, "We loved his approach at the plate" or "This guy has tremendous power to all fields" or even "He's a remarkable defensive player." We always end up hearing about athleticism, makeup, clutchiness and gamer-ism. Because that's how "baseball people" talk.
  17. You'll be annoyed if they take Brett Jackson. Toolsy but major contact issues. Sweet. A center fielder that can't stick in center and can't hit either. Awesome.
  18. A potential deep playoff run with Bears would=a huge payday in 2010. Not to mention would Plax want to have a rookie QB throwing to him? But it's not like the Bears guarantee a deep playoff run. This isn't Marian Hossa going to Detroit, or Randy Moss going to the Patriots. I like Chicago's chances, but let's not kid ourselves about their perception around the league. They still have to show it. The Jets are a fairly high profile team. I don't believe he feels like NY has chewed him up and spat him out. Hell, I could see him wanting to show up the Giants by doing well in their stadium for another team. Bottom line is I see no reason why he wouldn't go to the Jets, if they had the best offer. I'd like to see him wind up on the Bears, but I don't see that as a lock by any means.
  19. I don't get it. I know the Jets are in need of a WR that could help in the development of Mark Sanchez, but would Plax want to stay in NY . So do the Bears have more experienced or better WR than the Jets? I thought consensus was Chicago had the worst WR in the league. I don't see why Plaxico wouldn't want to stay in NY. It's probably going to come down to money. If the Jets can and do offer more, why not? It's not like the Bears are perennial contenders who guarantee victories.
  20. Back to back picking on the Pirates posts. What's the story here? Does this guy not belong anywhere near the top 5?
  21. Yeah, I'd think they'd want prospects who could help them in the future as opposed to swapping veterans for veterans. I'd think they'd be interested in cutting some costs, and getting prospects, which is is what the original post already noted. Actually it was a single prospect and our garbage. So it wasn't swapping veterans for veterans. It was some of their garbage, for some of our garbage, swapping out relievers with reasonably decent careers so far, with them saving money and getting a prospect. Maybe throw in another prospect if you insist.
  22. I read or heard something somewhere implying there was some sort of friction, but I didn't get any details. What sort of friction is there? Or is it media created? He was a decent minor leaguer, but nothing special, and has been a relatively disappointing major leaguer, right? I wouldn't if they traded for him, but I can't imagine the price being right from the White Sox. Can he do anything besides play 3rd if/when Aramis returns? Would he hold any residual value for 2010 other than as trade bait?
  23. Yeah, I'd think they'd want prospects who could help them in the future as opposed to swapping veterans for veterans. I'd think they'd be interested in cutting some costs, and getting prospects, which is is what the original post already noted.
×
×
  • Create New...