Jump to content
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. Not if he keeps OPSing in the 600s. you're kidding me you actually think he's had a sufficient MLB sample from which to judge him? he's progressed as a hitter in the minors the last several seasons, fwiw
  2. lol yer gonna get a league average pitcher at a reduced amount!
  3. definitely bench Megatron of those three. we don't even know who's throwing to him this week and the other two WR are as good as it gets
  4. Apparantly not. Maybe it's because no one is typing in green. if the jokes are so corny and flat-out dumb that you have to develop a way to telegraph them, maybe that should serve as some type of indication just not to make them in the first place
  5. Jackson hasn't had a good game since week 7, that's a hell of a leap of faith to take. you don't need to make that gamble, Turner is the 5th most productive RB in fantasy football. thinking about matchups over talent caused me to start Hillis over Deangelo Williams and nearly ruin my season. Turner's scored more points than Peterson
  6. Not a fan of his at all. Not a very good K/9, rather high H/9, and outside of 2007, he's shown a tendency to give up the longball. He's more BABIP dependent because of his lower K rate, but he's been fine with HR rate aside from when he got hurt in '05. I'm not suggesting he be a staple of the bullpen, but we could probably do worse than bringing him in for a year to be a middle reliever. and he'd likely fare even better with BABIP if we had a defensive stud in say, CF
  7. fangraphs makes life worth living
  8. well....yeah, i can agree with that. See, I can do it too. Get ready, you know Alabama is back. And it is good to be hated again. i didn't edit your post it was a freudian slip
  9. well....yeah, i can agree with that.
  10. do what you want, it's just odd that you had the same reaction to both goals. the first one only a handful of players in the league are capable of making, the second could have been scored by any talented forward in that spot. the Wings played it terribly
  11. ? that was an unremarkable goal Um... down 2-0 (against the best team in the west, and MAYBE the NHL).... And they take the lead with 4 seconds left... Toews 2 goals in 3 minutes? i'm well aware how good Detroit is, but that's just a skills competition shot most skilled players can make. i'm baffled with 5 seconds the def didn't collapse on him
  12. ? that was an unremarkable goal
  13. your comprehension is severely lacking; he didn't say that
  14. that was creepy
  15. What, no love for Waitress? Alabama is a little better than I thought. cmon Keri Russell isn't that manly
  16. i liked Tebow in that Serenity movie
  17. that one looked pretty good because his WR was open for 20 yds he has 0 chance for success in the NFL
  18. Tebow really can't throw for [expletive] who knew
  19. priorpower's rocking my world in this thread so the cardinals MI would be better next year with KJ/KG, Ludwick will probably regress from 1380 OPS and Rasmus' rookie season might be a rocky one hows my mind? yeah its blown you heard it here first folks, treasure that exclusive hard-hitting analysis what do you see from Pujols in 09? personally i think he might have a good year imo
  20. today's baseball stars are all guys named Rodriguez to me
  21. Don't think so...but fortunately I was online to go to the server and reset the connections. sorry about that i was curious so i did a search query of "roast" and "girlfriend" and next thing i know i got a server maxed out crash error
×
×
  • Create New...