Jump to content
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,587

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

 Content Type 

Profiles

North Side Baseball Article Archive, Part 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. sneakypower
    how are you even comparing these two players anyways? unless you're a big Mariners buff by some chance, obviously you're going to think more highly of a guy with flaws you don't notice/aren't aware of to the other flawed player you have better ability to scrutinize. it just doesn't make much sense.
  2. sneakypower
    what makes that so obvious? oh, and i'd also be remiss if i didn't mention Fuku was roughly 5 runs better than Ibanez on the basepaths last year
  3. sneakypower
    OK, but I can show you video clips of Fukudome looking stupid at the plate over & over again, after the beginning of the year.......and let's face it, without Fuku's hot start, his hitting numbers were absolutely abysmal. As it was, he ended at a 90 OPS+, but was far lower than that after June. How do you figure he'll project out better next year? I find it far more likely he'll continue to be like he was in the 2nd half of the year. It seems obvious to me that pitchers simply figured him out. the pics i added in there for hilarity if you arbitrarily dispose of all the at bats where he was productive, then sure he was an awful hitter. what's your point? March through June 340 PA 15.5 BB%, 19.5 K%, 20.1 LD%, 50.9 GB%, .133 ISO, .349 BABIP July through October 250 PA, 11.8 BB%, 22.5 K%, 17.8 LD%, 50.1 GB%, .105 ISO, .251 BABIP
  4. sneakypower
    http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/9711/RaulError3.gif http://i27.tinypic.com/28akex2.jpg
  5. sneakypower
    i'd argue Fukudome had a more productive season last year overall and projects to have a more productive season this year as well, by more than a small margin
  6. sneakypower
    Not if he keeps OPSing in the 600s. you're kidding me you actually think he's had a sufficient MLB sample from which to judge him? he's progressed as a hitter in the minors the last several seasons, fwiw
  7. sneakypower
    OH THANK GOD
  8. sneakypower
    lol yer gonna get a league average pitcher at a reduced amount!
  9. sneakypower
    girlfriend.
  10. sneakypower
    definitely bench Megatron of those three. we don't even know who's throwing to him this week and the other two WR are as good as it gets
  11. sneakypower
    Apparantly not. Maybe it's because no one is typing in green. if the jokes are so corny and flat-out dumb that you have to develop a way to telegraph them, maybe that should serve as some type of indication just not to make them in the first place
  12. sneakypower
    Jackson hasn't had a good game since week 7, that's a hell of a leap of faith to take. you don't need to make that gamble, Turner is the 5th most productive RB in fantasy football. thinking about matchups over talent caused me to start Hillis over Deangelo Williams and nearly ruin my season. Turner's scored more points than Peterson
  13. sneakypower
    Not a fan of his at all. Not a very good K/9, rather high H/9, and outside of 2007, he's shown a tendency to give up the longball. He's more BABIP dependent because of his lower K rate, but he's been fine with HR rate aside from when he got hurt in '05. I'm not suggesting he be a staple of the bullpen, but we could probably do worse than bringing him in for a year to be a middle reliever. and he'd likely fare even better with BABIP if we had a defensive stud in say, CF
  14. sneakypower
    fangraphs makes life worth living
  15. sneakypower
    well....yeah, i can agree with that. See, I can do it too. Get ready, you know Alabama is back. And it is good to be hated again. i didn't edit your post it was a freudian slip
  16. sneakypower
    well....yeah, i can agree with that.
  17. sneakypower
    do what you want, it's just odd that you had the same reaction to both goals. the first one only a handful of players in the league are capable of making, the second could have been scored by any talented forward in that spot. the Wings played it terribly
  18. sneakypower
    ? that was an unremarkable goal Um... down 2-0 (against the best team in the west, and MAYBE the NHL).... And they take the lead with 4 seconds left... Toews 2 goals in 3 minutes? i'm well aware how good Detroit is, but that's just a skills competition shot most skilled players can make. i'm baffled with 5 seconds the def didn't collapse on him
  19. sneakypower
    ? that was an unremarkable goal
  20. sneakypower
    unbelievable
  21. sneakypower
    your comprehension is severely lacking; he didn't say that
  22. sneakypower
    that was creepy
  23. sneakypower
    What, no love for Waitress? Alabama is a little better than I thought. cmon Keri Russell isn't that manly
  24. sneakypower
    i liked Tebow in that Serenity movie
  25. sneakypower
    Pie to Balt makes no sense whatsoever
×
×
  • Create New...