Can someone explain why we should expect a substantially better return for Garza this year than the Cubs got for Dempster in 2012? Obviously there is a big age difference, but that doesn't matter much in the last year of a deal. Garza has the better "stuff", but Dempster was pitching lights out for most of last season and was less of an injury risk. The only other difference I see from the Cubs standpoint is that they have more leverage with regard to making a tender offer to Garza. They had no intention of bringing Dempster back, but Garza could still have value to them beyond this season. That doesn't make him any better of an option to another team though. I'm a little worried that we're going to go through another month of crazy rumors and near-trades (minus the NTC fiasco) and end up with another underwhelming return. Who wants to talk me off the ledge?