Irrelevant Dude
-
Posts
13,294 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Irrelevant Dude
-
Not the Cardinals. They get extra picks for that. -
My thoughts exactly. Was he too young to see the first one?
-
Eric Davis hasn't aged a day.
-
Yeah, I'd be really pleased if the Cubs did that. That's why I wanted to trade down. The Cubs did trade down, twice, but just didn't tell anyone else.
-
I don't feel as bad about missing out on a guy with 2 last names.
-
Except that there was a much more obvious need to save money on that pick last year after drafting Bryant.
-
Have to wait and see how everything plays out tomorrow, but so far this feels like a Phil Emery draft.
-
Umm... What?
-
There aren't any advantages any more. I mean, yeah, you can still way overpay for guys when they become FA. Except that most guys worth overpaying for never hit free agency anymore.
-
Yes, I absolutely hate them and I don't understand why the rest of owners signed off on it.
-
In other words, the Cardinals will pick him. ...
-
They are still talking about the Pick #4 surprise on MLB Network. Give it a rest.
-
3.5 would be pretty high for him, but I think 3 is reasonable.
-
:roll:
-
In other words, the Cardinals will pick him.
-
He really Schwarbered it.
-
It makes the Brett Jackson pick look not quite as terrible.
-
Jake Fox
-
Going to commercial? Screw you MLB Network!
-
They're gonna keep using it, but badly dub over that part with the other provider, not unlike this: Maybe they can get Steve Goodman to re-record it? Too soon?
-
That is true to some degree, but it can also be offset by the increased demand brought by a good team. If all the games are sold out, there will be more people on the rooftops regardless of whether they have an obstruction-free view.
-
Exactly this. I have been to a couple rooftop parties and very few people are there to sit and watch the game. Even the unobstructed views leave a lot to be desired. Assuming the signs lead to additional revenue which helps the Cubs field a consistently competitive team, the rooftop owners will benefit from the excitement around the team more than they will be harmed by any obstructions.
-
Is this new or did I just miss it before? I understand there is a definite player safety issue and that justifies the change, but as a fan I will miss being able to clearly see who is warming up at any time.
-
Pythagorean Playoffs!
-
I dont know why but I decided to torture myself and read some posts from the first few pages of this thread. I don't even know what I was responding to, but upswing and 2014... oh how naive I was.
