Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Trade & Free Agent Rumors

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospect Rankings

Chicago Cubs News, Rumors & Analysis

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Chicago Cubs Fan Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. umm, where are these evaluations coming from? i'm going to have a really hard time trusting anything you say about hill if, apparently, the only two potential outcomes of his career are ace and complete bust. The evaluations come from what I've seen from them personally and what the numbers bear out. I don't think you could find more than a handful of people on these boards that truly believe Hill would be anything less than magnificent if he finally gets some control of his pitches, which it looks like he's getting closer to doing. At the same time, I just don't think Marshall will end up being quite that good. His middling strikeout rates don't bode well for an overpowering presence. He's going to rely a lot on his defense because of that. That's not to say he can't be a very effective pitcher, by any means, I just don't think we'll be mentioning him in the same sentence as somebody such as the Big Unit, unless we're talking physical appearance alone. At the same time, I do realize there's a very good chance that Hill wont even approach his ceiling. So perhaps I exaggerated a bit to say that he's got a 95% bust rate, and no chance for a career in between. I simply used that to illustrate a point, and I think you probably had a pretty good idea of that before you called me out on it. But let me just say how happy I am that which pitcher is going to be better is the argument, and that we're using these two pitchers. I don't know what I'd do if I were a Cardinals fan, with a grand total of 2 decent pitching prospects.
  2. I don't quite agree with you on that point. Marshall has plenty of potential, that's for sure... but Hill is just oozing with it. Unfortunately for Hill, it's all unrealized at the moment... but if he reaches the top of his game, I don't see any way that Marshall isn't left in the dust. At the same time, Marshall has a much better chance of reaching his ceiling than Hill does, even though it is lower. I see Marshall as having a 50% chance of being a "good" major league pitcher. Hill has a 5% chance to be an ace and a 95% bust rate.
  3. That's a good thing. It's kinda nice for the cubs to have a guy who comes out of nowhere and suceeds. I know it's a good thing for the club, but I had been dying to see Wade Miller in cubbie blue for years... :(
  4. With all the effort the front office has gone to to rid the clubhouse of malcontents, I don't see any way that they bring in Guillen.
  5. he used to be. he's not anymore -- he's had a significant drop in power since he left atlanta. ~.040 drop in IsoP. Don't get me wrong, that's a lot... but he's still up in the .225 range. It's not like he's suddenly going to be in any danger of becoming Neifi. Besides, he'd do well with in Wrigley.
  6. I'm not ready to commit yet, but I should be good for 25 a day once finals are over in a couple weeks. Edit: Will doing this result in getting more spam email coming in? I'm working off a fresh email address, and I'd rather not get it killed too quickly.
  7. Len >>>>> Chip Stoney >>>>> Bob Bob is getting better though... at least everything isn't an opening for him to tell a story about his time with the D'backs, like it was his first year. Now it's only an opening every other time. In 2-3 years, this could be one of the best announcing teams around.
  8. I don't think I could bring myself to do it just because of the age factor. Yeah, Sheff is better now, but he simply wont be playing as long. If we tried to trade Wood off, there'd be almost zero chance of re-signing him in the offseason. And with the chance he still has to be something really special, I can't trade away his future for a hired gun like Sheff.
  9. If we're gonna bring up Pie, I'd rather see us trade off Pierre for a first baseman. Moving Murton over would be kinda messy to start with in-season.
  10. I was just thinking that we don't have enough guys who could play 2B in a pinch... Cuddyer would solve that! :lol:
  11. I hate to say it, but I keep thinking Marshall is turning Wade Miller into trade-bait come the trade deadline...
  12. Actually, I think the Unit has a couple of inches on him. Maybe little unit would be more appropriate? uh....nevermind... Wow, I feel like I'm in a locker room right now...
  13. '' Letting him have kids with a woman springs immediately to mind...
  14. No rush to trade Rusch. Perhaps he can recapture his mojo in the bullpen. If he's traded, Florida might be a nice destination - a team with little to lose that might benefit from advice from a veteran. I wouldn't wish exile in KC on anybody. Stairs right now is worth a heck of a lot more than Glendon is potentially ever worth again. I'd pull the trigger on that trade in a second. Only problem is that the Royals wouldn't... I get the impression they're grooming Stairs for a front office job because he (inexplicably) loves it there.
  15. Like most of you, on a production/inning basis I prefer Wuertz to Rusch. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep Rusch in the pen. We are in dire need of mop-up guy that can throw 85 pitches every once in a while and stay (relatively) effective. Our bullpen has been thrown into disarray whenever we need somebody to come in and go 3 innings, as nobody was capable of it before. This is definately the right move to be made, in this situation.
  16. There had better not end up being a rainout. I'm leaving in 10 minutes to drive the three hours to Chicago for the game.
  17. I think there is somebody from this board that went to one of the Cubs-Cardinals games in Wrigley and said they saw Walker hanging out with the Cardinals. I'm not sure though. Yup, I was one of those people. We actually asked him to come to the Cubs and he said "You don't want my ___ on the team" Sweet, I love MadLibs! "You don't want my banana on the team" :shock: How ruthlessly absurd! :lol:
  18. Part of what's huring these guys so much is the lack of a real long-man in the pen, too. I think Aardsma threw 60 pitches today... that's not what he's used to. Not many pitchers are going to do well being stretched into a long role when they haven't been groomed for one.
  19. Given the choice between a great young position player and a great young pitcher, I'll take the position player each and every time. The pitchers are just too much of an injury risk, if any of us haven't realized that yet...
  20. His average is up to .275 now, but as someone else mentioned, he only has the one walk and isn't getting a whole lot of extra base hits or anything. that sounds awfully similar to another cf ive seen a lot of this year At least Corey has a cannon for an arm and the "potential" to have a hell of a year...
  21. Two very good years? He was the centerfield equivalent of Jeromy Burnitz circa 2005 the two years in question. WARP1's of 4.4 and 4.9, versus Burnitz with his 4.5 last year (mind you, those numbers are adjusted for position). I don't remember hearing a whole lot of commotion everytime somebody called Burnitz merely adequate or even horrible. But god forbid somebody says that about a fast guy with numbers that aren't good for his position...
  22. I'm not so sure you can say it was abberations based on sporadic use. I'd say he was getting sporadic use because he wasn't performing well, not the other way around. Yeah, I know he's a streaky hitter, but we really can't afford to pick him up and pray for a hot streak. When he's cold, he makes Neifi look like Barry Bonds...
  23. Tony Clark's OBP: 2001 - .374 2002 - .265 2003 -.300 2004 -.297 2005 - .366 He's hardly a sure thing to bring our OBP up. Last year was his only adequate year OBP-wise since he hit 30 back in '02.
  24. So there's a 40% chance that Jacques Jones won't suck? Or that he'll suck so much he'll implode...
×
×
  • Create New...