In 2000, Antonio Alfonseca was 45/49 in save opportunites. His peripherals indicated that he wasn't as good as his save numbers indicated. Those peripherals proved to be predictive. In 2001, he was 28/44 and in 2002 he as 19/28. While I hope Dempster is as good as his 33/35 might lead some to believe, there is enough reason to be concerned. Just out of curiosity (this is a dead-horse argument), which of Dempster's peripherals worry you? His walks. Yeah they trouble me as well. But his K rate helps to negate some of my worries about his control. I also like that he only allowed 1 HR in relief, getting lots of groundball outs. But, being a Cubs fan, I'm worried too. :roll: The problem with that is his K rate was nothing all that special. Once he left the rotation he only K'd 8.18 batters per 9 innings. Compare that to some of the current elite closers: K Rod 12.19/9 Lidge 12.09/9 Nathan 13.12 Ryan 12.80 Wagner 10.08 F. Cordero 10.30 Farnsworth 11.19 I want my closer to blow batters away like these guys. Dempster had an absolutely great year but he worries me for sure, especially since we are stuck with him for a while. Dempster just doesnt have the nasty stuff that a guy like Lidge or BJ Ryan has.[/i]