:lol: If Eager or Yakupov could hit an open net from 10 feet away they would have won. That's what they do: use their talent to almost win. Interesting fact: if they were in the NASCAR, the Oil would be in 2nd place and have a pretty decent shot at winning that division. That game felt like I was watching it in fast forward. That pace would have to work against the team playing their 3rd in 4 days. You can play that game both ways though. Hossa biffed on a goal crease pass that should have been an easy goal. All the advanced statistics show that this was a pretty dominant effort from the Hawks. They played the way they needed to play. Edmonton can skate with them on a normal night, and probably had a little more gas last night with the Hawks recent schedule. So the Hawks chipped it in deep, and cycled them to death. A few questionable offensive zone penalties and a blow out from our #1 D-man is the only reason they got on the board. Here's a good link on the advanced stats from last night, if you're into that sort of thing: http://www.boysonthebus.com/2013/02/25/game-notes-oilershawks-feb-25/ I was commenting more on Eberle's comment. I don't blame him for being frustrated for losing. They did everything they could and still lost. That sucks for them. If they ever figure it out, they will be a force to reckoned with whatever they wind up calling that division. This was a good win for the Hawks. Though they dominated play statistically that doesn't always translate to actually winning the game. The Oil aren't a terrible team. Carcillo looked a lot faster than he did the other night. I still would rather have Saad on the top line but it's Q and that's what he does. I think the reason people might think Roszival was bad last night was because he was easily the slowest player on the ice and that would make anyone look bad. As stated above, for being the 6th defenseman he did fine. If Montador ever returns, do they trade him or Roszival? If Montador proved he was healthy I'd have to believe there would be a decent market for him.